On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 1:02 AM Dave Fisher wrote:
Hi Dave, first thank you for your reply.
>
> > I’m not part of your community, so it is possible I’m misreading this,
> but I see some issues from a casual glance. IMO, the two proposals need to
> be discussed further and consensus reached befor
Hi Tison,
thanks for the clarification.
You are right, the voting document says that only PPMC members have vetoing
rights.
I think this answer my initial question, i.e:
- vetos on code changes exist, as per Apache Voting Process
- PPMC members can veto code changes - including proposals like t
Hi Paolo,
Perhaps the wording in the voting process [1] page is not accurate. In
my understanding, the "Binding votes" part is appled for all the three
vote types. It writes:
> Who can vote is, to some extent, a community-specific thing.
>
> PMC members have formally binding votes, but in general
Hi,
> On Mar 11, 2025, at 4:23 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Looking at the first propopal, I was surprised to discover
> https://www.kie.org/ - having a domain name like this is not in line with ASF
> trademark policy, nor is having a domain name like https://kogito.kie.org/.
> There
Hi,
Looking at the first propopal, I was surprised to discover https://www.kie.org/
- having a domain name like this is not in line with ASF trademark policy, nor
is having a domain name like https://kogito.kie.org/. There are other trademark
issues with those site(s), I trust the PPMC is aware
Adding some context to this discussion:
- Apache KIE mentor Brian has provided guidance on similar matters
before [1][2].
- A guideline is already in place to define how discussions,
proposals, and votes should work [3], and it was formally approved
[4].
Regarding the proposals in question, they
Hello,
this is Paolo Bizzarri. I am part of the Apache Kie project.
I am looking for clarifications about the official policy of Apache
foundation about code changes and vetoes.
As per this document in the Apache web site, a -1 to a proposal for a code
change is a veto - i.e. it "kills the propo