I raised https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-704
On 2025/06/30 23:37:24 Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Would it be possible to adjust the 1st paragraph to reduce the ambiguity?
> > The contributor of the code or documentation is the copyright holder
> > and the fact that the code is com
Hi,
> Would it be possible to adjust the 1st paragraph to reduce the ambiguity?
> The contributor of the code or documentation is the copyright holder
> and the fact that the code is committed by someone who has signed a
> CLA does not alter this.
That’s not a page owned by the incubator. Perhaps
I'm happy with the interpretation that CLAs are only required by committers.
The docs [1] do say this though:
All contributors of ideas, code, or documentation to any Apache
projects must complete, sign, and submit via email an Individual
Contributor License Agreement (ICLA).
The purpose of thi
Hi,
> I don't think that it is usually necessary to ask contributors to file an
> ICLA in order to send a patch.
Correct, it is not required, as someone who has signed an ICLA (i.e a
committer) will merge the patch.
> If I understand correctly such ICLA is required only for new committers and
>
Hello,
I was discussing with some members (in particular PG Fanning) in the
Openservless podling community about the requirements for contributors to
file an ICLA in order to submit patches to an Apache Project on Github.
I don't think that it is usually necessary to ask contributors to file an
IC
