On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Janne Jalkanen wrote:
> I don't mind championing you but as mentioned by others, there will be
>> several hurdles to overcome. To change the license, you will have to get
>> an
>> agreement from everybody who ever contributed a patch to the source you
>> plan
>> to
I don't mind championing you but as mentioned by others, there will be
several hurdles to overcome. To change the license, you will have to
get an
agreement from everybody who ever contributed a patch to the source
you plan
to incubate, even for a minor bug fix. I don't know how painful that
ds on ObjectWeb and almost 1 posts on
> >>> mailing
> >>> list. It is widely used all around the world in production, typically
> >>> integrated into different kind of applications, from DocumentManagement
> >&
lmost 1 posts on
>>> mailing
>>> list. It is widely used all around the world in production, typically
>>> integrated into different kind of applications, from DocumentManagement
>>> and government applications up to applications for special purposes like
>>> bank services, HR, Help desk, ... and in many, many others
>>>
>>> If you woul
Hi Sasa,
I'm following apache.incubator not very closely but looking at
"http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html#template-ip"; you need
a CLA for all contributions (and probable patches). And this seems
difficult for a mature project where many people contributed stuff under
LGPL - but a
ications up to applications for special purposes like
> bank services, HR, Help desk, ... and in many, many others
>
> If you would be willing to act as a champion on Shark's behalf, please let
> us know.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Sasa.
>
>
>
--
View
Hi Sasa,
+) sorry but I could find no link to the proposal - could you repost the
link?
+) I worked for Together Teamlösungen many moons ago so I'm aware of
Enhydra Shark (but no affiliation for the time being)
So without knowing the proposal I think it is a successful open source
project but mov
Hi,
> Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
>> ...why are moving from ObjectWeb since it is
>> well-known and respected community?...
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 1:56 PM, sasaboy wrote:
> ...* Resolve current potential licensing issues that are addressed in the
> Apache 2.0 license, but not in the LGPL license...
hers
>>
>> If you would be willing to act as a champion on Shark's behalf, please
>> let
>> us know.
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Sasa.
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
Hi Sasa,
the very first question is - why are moving from ObjectWeb since it is
well-known and respected community?
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
sasaboy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> some weeks ago, I've posted a question on this mailing list on how to start
> new project on Apache.
> After reading posts on ma
many, many others
If you would be willing to act as a champion on Shark's behalf, please let
us know.
Thanks in advance,
Sasa.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Champion-needed-for-new-workflow-project-proposal-tp22287174p22287174.html
Sent from the Apache Incubator -
11 matches
Mail list logo
