Jeremy,
I agree entirely. Pretty much everything you just said is part of the
current discussion. Not sure why it is happening on the PMC mailing list,
other than that no one moved it, since there is really nothing sensitive
being discussed, just options for how to better structure oversight.
I
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Steven Noels wrote:
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
[ context not fully acquired ]
s/Lenya/Geronimo/
As you know, we are discussing some options related to this topic. One
would be that for a given subproject, we would have
[EMAIL PROTECTED], where the members of that list c
Steven Noels wrote:
> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> > The Incubator should try to minimize cross-votes, as they have shown
> > in practice to be very confusing and not productive.
> >
> > I don't like this Mentor+Lenya+IncubatorPMC double vote either. The
> > alternative is to have all Lenya committ
Steven Noels wrote:
The discussion on cocoon/incubator PMC lists was about whether the
Incubator PMC rather than the receiving PMC or mentors should vote for
an incubatee release. Nicola suggested that we should discuss this on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Pardon me for eventual context loss. Here it goes:
The discussion on cocoon/incubator PMC lists was about whether the
Incubator PMC rather than the receiving PMC or mentors should vote for
an incubatee release. Nicola suggested that we should discuss this on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Pardon me for eventual context loss. Here it goes:
--
