Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On 4/17/06, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>I'm finding this part of the process puzzling,
...
>
> The general rule of thumb is that we'd like to have CLAs on-file for
> all code imports. This way we can relicense the contributions under a
> new license
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
> Does the remaining ip loop to close involve filling out the ip clearance
> template at http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html ? This
> is counter intuitive to me because that page says "This form is not for
> new projects."
Because it should be a SUBSET of t
On 4/17/06, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm finding this part of the process puzzling, and I'm not finding what
> I'm looking for in the incubator site docs. But if people will explain
> it or point to specific podlings that sparked discussions so I can find
> them in the archives
This post is motivated by Noel's comment about Lucene.Net from
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200604.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
> For my information, I notice that the STATUS file says that this is from the
> DotLucene project on SourceForge. How are things going with IP
