-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The following votes were given:
+1 Alan Cabrera (transferred from vote on vcl-...@i.a.o list)
+1 Kevan Miller (transferred from vote on vcl-...@i.a.o list)
+1 Niall Pemberton
+1 Ant Elder
Leo Simons made some notable comments:
> 3) There is no websi
Hey hey,
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Josh Thompson wrote:
> The Apache VCL community voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache
> VCL 2.1. We would like to request the endorsement of the Incubator PMC to
> publish this release.
>
> The release artifact, sums, and GPG signature can b
On 23/11/2009, Josh Thompson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> I'm not on the general incubator list but have followed the discussion for
> this thread via the online archives.
>
> There are two things I'd like to point out. I created the archive in .bz2
> format
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Nov 23, 2009, at 11:10 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 23/11/2009, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>>
>>> On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:49 PM, sebb wrote:
>>>
>>>
There is only a "bz2" archive.
Normally projects release archives in zip andr tar.gz for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm not on the general incubator list but have followed the discussion for
this thread via the online archives.
There are two things I'd like to point out. I created the archive in .bz2
format because that is what was suggested in the last paragrap
sebb wrote:
> Not relevant - the discussion is about what archives are supported by
> the OS, not the development process.
>
I thought it was about which archive formats an ASF release should be
distributed in. All I ever recall reading in policy documents are
requirements about the /contents/
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> On Nov 23, 2009, at 9:02 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
>>
>> On Nov 23, 2009, at 11:10 AM, sebb wrote:
>>
>>> On 23/11/2009, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:49 PM, sebb wrote:
> There is only a "bz2" arch
On Nov 23, 2009, at 9:02 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Nov 23, 2009, at 11:10 AM, sebb wrote:
On 23/11/2009, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:49 PM, sebb wrote:
There is only a "bz2" archive.
Normally projects release archives in zip andr tar.gz format
which are
more common
On Nov 23, 2009, at 11:10 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 23/11/2009, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:49 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>>
>>> There is only a "bz2" archive.
>>> Normally projects release archives in zip andr tar.gz format which are
>>> more commonly supported.
>>>
>>> IMO, this
tains to policy).
- Original Message
> From: sebb
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Mon, November 23, 2009 11:51:58 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] release Apache VCL 2.1
>
> On 23/11/2009, Branko Čibej wrote:
> > sebb wrote:
> > > On 23/11/2009, Andrus Adamc
On 23/11/2009, Branko Čibej wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > On 23/11/2009, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> >
> >> On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:49 PM, sebb wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> There is only a "bz2" archive.
> >>> Normally projects release archives in zip andr tar.gz format which are
> >>> more common
sebb wrote:
> On 23/11/2009, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
>> On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:49 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> There is only a "bz2" archive.
>>> Normally projects release archives in zip andr tar.gz format which are
>>> more commonly supported.
>>>
>>> IMO, this is a release blocker
>>>
On 23/11/2009, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
> On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:49 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>
> > There is only a "bz2" archive.
> > Normally projects release archives in zip andr tar.gz format which are
> > more commonly supported.
> >
> > IMO, this is a release blocker
> >
>
> Just curious why you th
I ran a RAT report on the release and all looks good. Has the
appropriate license/notice/disclaimer files. From what I can see only
the project source is shipped, so although there are some dependencies
that wouldn't be allowed under ASF policy, since they're not shipped
with the release then this
On Nov 23, 2009, at 5:49 PM, sebb wrote:
There is only a "bz2" archive.
Normally projects release archives in zip andr tar.gz format which are
more commonly supported.
IMO, this is a release blocker
Just curious why you think this is a blocker? Each project knows
better what formats are co
On 18/11/2009, Josh Thompson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Incubator PMC,
>
> The Apache VCL community voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache
> VCL 2.1. We would like to request the endorsement of the Incubator PMC to
> publish this release.
>
> Th
All,
Would appreciate some reviews and votes for this release. It's the first
Incubator release for VCL and could definitely benefit from some extra eyes.
Thanks!
--kevan
On Nov 18, 2009, at 3:42 PM, Josh Thompson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Incubator PMC,
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Incubator PMC,
The Apache VCL community voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache
VCL 2.1. We would like to request the endorsement of the Incubator PMC to
publish this release.
The release artifact, sums, and GPG signature can be found h
18 matches
Mail list logo
