David Nalley wrote:
>
> (and incidentally you don't seem to be moving older versions (0.6.0,
> 0.6.1, etc) to the archive when promoting a new release. - see
> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#when-to-archive for more)
Anything that is in the "dist" area is automatically archived,
as explai
On 25 November 2013 11:09, David Nalley wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Kanak Biscuitwala
> wrote:
>>> Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 00:53:13 +
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] helix-0.6.2-incubating
>>> From: seb...@gmail.com
>>> To: general@incubator.ap
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Kanak Biscuitwala wrote:
>> Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 00:53:13 +
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] helix-0.6.2-incubating
>> From: seb...@gmail.com
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>>
>> On 23 November 2013 23:47, Kanak Biscuitwala w
> Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 00:53:13 +
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] helix-0.6.2-incubating
> From: seb...@gmail.com
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>
> On 23 November 2013 23:47, Kanak Biscuitwala wrote:
>> Oh, interesting. I believe it generates this automatically with the
n handles
this properly yet (early versions were not good in this regard).
> Olivier, can you provide some context?
>
>
>> Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 23:01:14 +
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] helix-0.6.2-incubating
>> From: seb...@gmai
?
> Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 23:01:14 +
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] helix-0.6.2-incubating
> From: seb...@gmail.com
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>
> On 23 November 2013 22:07, Kanak Biscuitwala wrote:
>> No, the current release doesn't have a NOTICE file at the top level
he NOTICE file must relate to the contents of the collection it
>> relates to: e.g. the tag or the source archive or the binary archive
>> etc.
>> Likewise the LICENSE file.
>>
>>> Do we need to go through the entire release process again?
>>
>> Does the
3 Nov 2013 21:28:25 +
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] helix-0.6.2-incubating
> From: seb...@gmail.com
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>
> On 23 November 2013 19:57, Kanak Biscuitwala wrote:
>> sebb, I fixed the tag to include NOTICE here:
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org
elease have the correct NOTICE and LICENSE files?
>
>> From: kana...@hotmail.com
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: [VOTE] helix-0.6.2-incubating
>> Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 18:50:31 -0800
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is to call for a vote on rele
lease process again?
> From: kana...@hotmail.com
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] helix-0.6.2-incubating
> Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 18:50:31 -0800
>
> Hi,
>
> This is to call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
> Helix 0.6.2-incub
On 19 November 2013 02:50, Kanak Biscuitwala wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is to call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
> Helix 0.6.2-incubating. This is the first release candidate of our third
> release at Apache.
>
> Apache Helix is a generic cluster management framework that ma
> Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 12:42:47 -0800
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] helix-0.6.2-incubating
> From: maha...@hortonworks.com
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>
> +1 for the release.
> Mahadev Konar
> Hortonworks Inc.
> http://hortonworks.com/
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 2
+1 for the release.
Mahadev Konar
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:45 PM, kishore g wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are short of 1 binding vote. Appreciate if any one can review.
>
> Thanks,
> Kishore G
> On Nov 18, 2013 6:51 PM, "Kanak Biscuitwala" wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>
Hello,
We are short of 1 binding vote. Appreciate if any one can review.
Thanks,
Kishore G
On Nov 18, 2013 6:51 PM, "Kanak Biscuitwala" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is to call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
> Helix 0.6.2-incubating. This is the first release candidate of our
Hi,
This is to call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
Helix 0.6.2-incubating. This is the first release candidate of our third
release at Apache.
Apache Helix is a generic cluster management framework that makes it easy
to build partitioned and replicated, fault tolerant a
15 matches
Mail list logo
