As I've understood the situation:
- Code was open sourced at apache to become the CMDA project
- Some commits happened against a repo, from what I can tell building a
basic skeleton of a webapp for collecting data
- Commits stopped in November 2015
- There has been very little on list discussions,
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> Tsengdar,
>
> Can you give a rationale for your vote?
>
> Have you reviewed the history of the situation?
>
> Do you think that the current situation is acceptable?
>
> What do you think will change the current situation?
>
> Why didn't you vo
Tsengdar,
Can you give a rationale for your vote?
Do you think that the current situation is acceptable?
What do you think will change the current situation?
Have you reviewed the history of the situation?
On Feb 6, 2017 6:07 AM, "Lee, Tsengdar J. (HQ-DK000)" <
tsengdar.j@nasa.gov> wrote
Tsengdar,
Can you give a rationale for your vote?
Have you reviewed the history of the situation?
Do you think that the current situation is acceptable?
What do you think will change the current situation?
Why didn't you vote while the vote was going on?
On Feb 6, 2017 6:07 AM, "Lee, Tsen
-1
On 2/2/17, 7:20 PM, "John D. Ament" wrote:
All,
Due to the lack of progress made by the CMDA podling I am calling a vote to
retire them. A discussion and vote thread [1] have occurred on the
podling's lists. It was confirmed that development activities happen
outsid
Results:
The IPMC has accepted to retire the CMDA podling. +1's from Ted, James,
Hadrian, myself, as well as on the podling's lists: Chirs Mattmann and
Michael Joyce.
I'll begin processing the paperwork, etc.
John
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 7:20 PM John D. Ament wrote:
> All,
>
> Due to the lack
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 12:07 PM Ted Dunning wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 8:31 AM, toki wrote:
>
> > Does retirement mean that source code is no longer available?
> >
>
>
> No.
>
> But any current versions of the code will need to be gotten from whoever
> maintains the project outside Apache.
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 8:31 AM, toki wrote:
> Does retirement mean that source code is no longer available?
>
No.
But any current versions of the code will need to be gotten from whoever
maintains the project outside Apache. Since CMDA is ongoing (just not in an
Apache way) the project maintai
On 2 February 2017 4:20:43 pm PST, "John D. Amen wrote:
> I am calling a vote to retire them.
Does retirement mean that source code is no longer available?
One description that I read implied that it was deleted, whilst a set on
instructions implied that it was retained.
> It was confirmed th
+1
Hadrian
On 02/02/2017 07:20 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
All,
Due to the lack of progress made by the CMDA podling I am calling a vote to
retire them. A discussion and vote thread [1] have occurred on the
podling's lists. It was confirmed that development activities happen
outside the ASF.
I
+1
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 7:20 PM John D. Ament wrote:
> All,
>
> Due to the lack of progress made by the CMDA podling I am calling a vote to
> retire them. A discussion and vote thread [1] have occurred on the
> podling's lists. It was confirmed that development activities happen
> outside th
+1
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 4:20 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> All,
>
> Due to the lack of progress made by the CMDA podling I am calling a vote to
> retire them. A discussion and vote thread [1] have occurred on the
> podling's lists. It was confirmed that development activities happen
> outside
All,
Due to the lack of progress made by the CMDA podling I am calling a vote to
retire them. A discussion and vote thread [1] have occurred on the
podling's lists. It was confirmed that development activities happen
outside the ASF.
I'm considering this a 72 hour lazy consensus vote since 3 IP
13 matches
Mail list logo
