>
> -P
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
>
> From: Benson Margulies
> Sent: 11/25/2011 11:56 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3
>
> Well, fine, I am happy to +1.
>
Hi all,
We could use another vote or two,
Thanks!
-P
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Benson Margulies
Sent: 11/25/2011 11:56 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3
Well, fine, I am happy to +1.
On
On 2011-11-26, ant elder wrote:
> There was some helpful discussion about this in
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-59 and the ML discussion
> around that, for example,
> http://apache.markmail.org/message/u66o5ucyfquxjl7i?q=LEGAL-59, and
> theres also https://issues.apache.org/jira/br
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Can anybody please point me to the result of the conversation that
> defines our current understanding of what goes into NOTICE and what
> doesn't so I don't give bad advice to podlings? I'm pretty sure this
> must have changed over the ye
On 2011-11-25, ant elder wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>> The issue is that there's a misc acknowledgement in there which is
>> not a relocated IP notice. Are those OK, or not? (@Leo, help!)
> Not including something in the NOTICE that must be required mig
On 2011-11-25, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I hate to have to say this, but I have concerns about the NOTICE file
> based on recent traffic here.
If anything this is a case of "ask and get three different answers" as
the Lucene.NET community added the stuff to the NOTICE file because I as
a mentor t
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 08:18:49PM +, ant elder wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Marvin Humphrey
> wrote:
> > Not as frustrating as putting up a release candidate which twists in the
> > wind
> > for weeks waiting for a IPMC member to review because Mentors are awol! The
> > few in
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
>
> Not as frustrating as putting up a release candidate which twists in the wind
> for weeks waiting for a IPMC member to review because Mentors are awol! The
> few individuals who do this thankless work on a regular basis are crucial to
>
Well, fine, I am happy to +1.
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> On Nov 25, 2011, at 8:32 AM, ant elder wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Benson Margulies
>> wrote:
>>> I hate to have to say this, but I have concerns about the NOTICE file
>>> based on recent
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 10:53:43AM -0800, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> I think that some votes on this list are overly critical, often laden with
> personal opinions and not real Foundation requirements. This leads to a
> very frustrating experience to new podling members who are unable to tell
> the
On Nov 25, 2011, at 8:32 AM, ant elder wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>> I hate to have to say this, but I have concerns about the NOTICE file
>> based on recent traffic here.
>
> LOL
>
>> Unfortunately, that conversation left me
>> with a giant headache a
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I hate to have to say this, but I have concerns about the NOTICE file
> based on recent traffic here.
LOL
> Unfortunately, that conversation left me
> with a giant headache and no clear idea.
>
> The issue is that there's a misc acknowle
I hate to have to say this, but I have concerns about the NOTICE file
based on recent traffic here. Unfortunately, that conversation left me
with a giant headache and no clear idea.
The issue is that there's a misc acknowledgement in there which is not
a relocated IP notice. Are those OK, or not?
On 2011-11-23, sebb wrote:
> On 23 November 2011 05:17, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>> I'm happy to announce that Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3 is available and
>> ready for your testing and voting.
>> Release candidate artifacts:
>> http://people.apache.org/~pnasser/Lucene.Net/2.9.4-incubating
On 23 November 2011 05:17, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
>
> All,
>
> I'm happy to announce that Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3 is available and
> ready for your testing and voting.
>
>
> Release candidate artifacts:
> http://people.apache.org/~pnasser/Lucene.Net/2.9.4-incubating-RC3/
The source arc
On 2011-11-23, Prescott Nasser wrote:
> I'm happy to announce that Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3 is
> available and ready for your testing and voting.
This release has one IPMC +1 so far (mine) and needs at least two more.
Stefan
---
All,
I'm happy to announce that Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3 is available and
ready for your testing and voting.
Release candidate artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~pnasser/Lucene.Net/2.9.4-incubating-RC3/
SVN tag revision:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/tag
17 matches
Mail list logo