Thanks for the vote.
At this moment there is still one -1 vote made by Sebb, could you please
take a look at this release and change it to a +1 or indicate what is still
wrong?
Thanks!
2012/12/1 Roman Shaposhnik
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> > ||| Hi all,
> > ||
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> ||| Hi all,
> |||
> ||| I would like to start the vote for the first release of Celix!
> ||| The last few months we have been working on this release.
> ||| Most of the time went into cleaning up sources, getting the required
> ||| files i
Hi,
Great. Please make it available in SVN so that I can review.
>
Done. The files in SVN are already a little bit further then the source in
the release. So there will probably be some small changes.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1408711
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=r
Hi!
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 4:13 AM, Alexander Broekhuis
wrote:
> Furthermore, I have created a exclude file for RAT which excludes these
> files. I still have to add it to SVN though..
Great. Please make it available in SVN so that I can review.
Thanks,
Roman.
Hi,
-1 (binding) based on the RAT check: my cursory run of RAT
> (http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat/index.html) uncovered
> 61 Unknown Licenses.
>
I've taken a look at the reported files. They are all files that either
can't or shouldn't have a header, or files that have a different licens
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 1:26 AM, Alexander Broekhuis
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for looking into the release!
>
>
>> -1 (binding) based on the RAT check: my cursory run of RAT
>> (http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat/index.html) uncovered
>> 61 Unknown Licenses.
>>
>> Here's what I would like to s
Hi,
Thanks for looking into the release!
> -1 (binding) based on the RAT check: my cursory run of RAT
> (http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat/index.html) uncovered
> 61 Unknown Licenses.
>
> Here's what I would like to suggest for cutting the new RC:
>1. make it easy to run the RAT check
||| Hi all,
|||
||| I would like to start the vote for the first release of Celix!
||| The last few months we have been working on this release.
||| Most of the time went into cleaning up sources, getting the required
||| files into the correct place etc.
|||
||| The source release file and signatu
On 30 October 2012 20:18, Florian Holeczek wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> taking this out of the Celix vote thread in order to keep it tidy.
>
> Sebb wrote:
>> The file documents/Celix.graffle does not have a license.
>
> In JSPWiki, we have a .graffle file, too. Although this is XML, I consider
> this a b
Hi Alexander,
Alexander Broekhuis wrote:
>> In JSPWiki, we have a .graffle file, too. Although this is XML, I consider
>> this a binary file, just like a JPEG image for example. It's the document
>> format of Graffle, a graphics software for Mac OS X.
>
> In the Celix case the file can/should be
Hi,
>
> I agree that the download problem is not a blocker for the release.
> Until it is fixed, I suggest adding a note to any vote e-mails to warn
> reviewers about the problen.
>
Agreed.
>
> Using wget, I was able to download the archive, sig and hashes.
> The sig is OK.
> The hashes have an
Hi,
> In JSPWiki, we have a .graffle file, too. Although this is XML, I consider
> this a binary file, just like a JPEG image for example. It's the document
> format of Graffle, a graphics software for Mac OS X.
>
In the Celix case the file can/should be removed. But otherwise, it being a
file c
Hi all,
taking this out of the Celix vote thread in order to keep it tidy.
Sebb wrote:
> The file documents/Celix.graffle does not have a license.
In JSPWiki, we have a .graffle file, too. Although this is XML, I consider this
a binary file, just like a JPEG image for example. It's the document
On 29 October 2012 10:23, Marcel Offermans wrote:
> On Oct 27, 2012, at 17:26 , Alexander Broekhuis wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>> http://pgp.mit.edu/ is a go-to place for most of us.
>>
>> I've added the key to mit.edu as well.
>>
>> Concerning the download, I've changed the mime-type but that doesn
On Oct 27, 2012, at 17:26 , Alexander Broekhuis wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>> http://pgp.mit.edu/ is a go-to place for most of us.
>
> I've added the key to mit.edu as well.
>
> Concerning the download, I've changed the mime-type but that doesn't seem
> to help. But since this is only the case when di
Hi all,
> http://pgp.mit.edu/ is a go-to place for most of us.
>
I've added the key to mit.edu as well.
Concerning the download, I've changed the mime-type but that doesn't seem
to help. But since this is only the case when directly downloading from the
svn, and not the case when downloading fr
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 1:42 AM, Alexander Broekhuis
wrote:
>>
>> -1
>>
>> The key id (EB686AF9) is not available from the standard PGP servers.
>>
>
> I've added the key to the pgp keyserver (http://keyserver.pgp.com/) when I
> created it. Searching via the key shows me the correct entry. Is ther
Hi Sebb,
Thanks for your replies, I forgot some of the links, see my remarks inline.
> Where is the release tag that corresponds with the release?
>
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/celix/tags/celix-0.0.1-incubating/
>
> Where is the KEYS file?
>
I followed what seemed to be the def
On 23 October 2012 18:57, Matthias Friedrich wrote:
> On Tuesday, 2012-10-23, sebb wrote:
> [...]
>> There is something wrong when downloading using a browser.
>> I tried both Firefox and Chrome; they both result in the same
>> (corrupted) file. However Opera is OK.
>
> Downloaded it with Chrome
On Tuesday, 2012-10-23, sebb wrote:
[...]
> There is something wrong when downloading using a browser.
> I tried both Firefox and Chrome; they both result in the same
> (corrupted) file. However Opera is OK.
Downloaded it with Chrome and the file was compressed with gzip twice.
Same thing with th
On 23 October 2012 16:43, sebb wrote:
> On 23 October 2012 13:57, Alexander Broekhuis wrote:
>> Hi incubator people,
>>
>> I would like to start the vote for the first release of Celix!
>> The last few months we have been working on this release.
>> Most of the time went into cleaning up sources,
On 23 October 2012 13:57, Alexander Broekhuis wrote:
> Hi incubator people,
>
> I would like to start the vote for the first release of Celix!
> The last few months we have been working on this release.
> Most of the time went into cleaning up sources, getting the required
> files into the correct
+1 (non binding)
David
On Tuesday, 23 October 2012, Alexander Broekhuis
wrote:
> Hi incubator people,
>
> I would like to start the vote for the first release of Celix!
> The last few months we have been working on this release.
> Most of the time went into cleaning up sources, getting the requi
Hi incubator people,
I would like to start the vote for the first release of Celix!
The last few months we have been working on this release.
Most of the time went into cleaning up sources, getting the required
files into the correct place etc.
This release has already been approved by our mentor
24 matches
Mail list logo
