Thanks for your votes and comments.
I'm delighted to announce that this vote passes with the following
results:
3 binding +1s:
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Thejas Nair
Daniel Dai
1 non-binding +1s:
Wang Wei
We will remove the .sha256 file and update the Copyright to 2016 for the
next release.
+1 (binding)
Checked md5, sha256 and gpg signatures. Glance through RELEASE_NOTES,
NOTICE, LICENSE, sampled source code files for LICENSE HEADER.
Better to update Apache copyright year to 2016 next time.
Daniel
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Thejas Nair wrote:
> +1 (binding)
> Examined the
+1 (binding)
Examined the LICENSE, NOTICE, README, and DISCLAIMER files. Checked
the signatures and checksum.
Like in the previous release, sha256 checksum matches what is in the
email, however, the .sha256 file seems like a different binary file.
The .md5 hash is the only hash most projects seem
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On 01/11/2016 02:12 PM, ooibc wrote:
Hi all,
The SINGA community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache
SINGA 0.2.0 (incubating). The license issues in RC1 have been fixed.
The vote thread is at:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/singa-dev/201601
+1 (non-binding)
The licenses can be checked using Apache Rat via
```
./autogen.sh
./configure
make rat
```
Best,
Wei
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 9:12 PM, ooibc wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The SINGA community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache
> SINGA 0.2.0 (incubating). The license i
Hi all,
The SINGA community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
Apache
SINGA 0.2.0 (incubating). The license issues in RC1 have been fixed.
The vote thread is at:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/singa-dev/201601.mbox/%3CCAJz0iLtvBC3krxJp8=7Jb2suhGpwFbUtB=dtgpysg-ycndr...@m
Hi,
We are cancelling this vote and will call another vote for RC2.
regards
beng chin
On 2016-01-10 13:32, ooibc wrote:
Hi all,
The SINGA community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
Apache
SINGA 0.2.0 (incubating).
The vote thread is at:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/m
Hi,
> We have updated the files to resolve the license issues.
Thanks for making the changes.
As the RC artefact has changed I believe the PPMC would need to revote on it
before the IPMC can vote on it. Given there been no code changes that PPMC vote
should be a trivial process.
> We managed
IANAL, but the files state:
# As a special exception to the GNU General Public License,
# if you distribute this file as part of a program or library that
# is built using GNU Libtool, you may include this file under the
# same distribution terms that you use for the rest of that program.
If this
John,
The language within the header of those files includes things like the
following as found in ltmain.sh
# As a special exception to the GNU General Public License,
# if you distribute this file as part of a program or library that
# is built using GNU Libtool, you may include this file under
Daniel,
Could you explain those exceptions? I don't think I've ever heard of GPL
being OK'd to use in an AL release.
John
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 7:41 AM Daniel Gruno wrote:
> +0.999 - seem okay but some files are missing license headers.
>
> The seemingly GPL (some aren't GPL at all) files Ju
Thanks for your comments, Daniel and Justine.
We have updated the files to resolve the license issues.
New path: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/singa/0.2.0-RC1/
MD5: E2 10 59 04 9F F1 B8 F1 10 25 82 9A B9 72 6A 4C
SHA256: D08C0425 87B9EB50 2C70E527 11DC4C7F 1768EB7F 9CDBB0EB 057
Thanks Justin for the detailed check,
> GPL licensed files includes:
> ./config/ltmain.sh
> ./config/ltversion.m4
> ./config/lt~obsolete.m4
> ./config/config.guess
> ./config/config.sub
> ./config/install-sh (?)
> ./Makefile.in (?) this also has a ASF header which seems odd
>
> While this seems
+0.999 - seem okay but some files are missing license headers.
The seemingly GPL (some aren't GPL at all) files Justin linked to have
exceptions for use which allows it.
I ran it through my usual stuff,
http://compliance.rocks/result.html?358649c0
- and every single GPL-licensed file has an excep
Hi,
Sorry it’s -1 binding due to the inclusion of GPL licenced files [1] and other
license issues [2] and unable to compile from source. Happy to reconsider if
explained.
I checked:
- release contains incubating
- signatures and hashes good
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE has some minor issues
-
Hi all,
The SINGA community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
Apache
SINGA 0.2.0 (incubating).
The vote thread is at:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/singa-dev/201601.mbox/%3CCAJz0iLtBLSr3AZ%3DJVPedBkK%3Dhtpw8vQKax%3DvkrcORCzAcDXneA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
and the result
16 matches
Mail list logo
