Patrick,
I think we should resolve this, but I am wondering s this a strict
requirement for this release? In looking for the correct entry for
JUnit I noticed hadoop-1.0.2 distributes the JUnit jar and nothing is
mentioned in the NOTICE.txt.
Brock
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Brock Noland w
Hi,
OK, sounds good. I updated the notice and will create a new RC.
Brock
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> Hi Brock, see these:
>
> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
> http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html (older)
>
> Junit is CPL, checkout the text "How should
I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRUNIT-103 once we get
that fixed I will spin up another RC.
Brock
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> -1. junit jar (CPL, cat b) is included in the binary artifact however
> there is nothing in the notice for this.
>
> Patrick
>
Hi Brock, see these:
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html (older)
Junit is CPL, checkout the text "How should so-called "Weak Copyleft"
Licenses be handled?", including "Software under the following
licenses may be included in binary form within an Apa
-1. junit jar (CPL, cat b) is included in the binary artifact however
there is nothing in the notice for this.
Patrick
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Brock Noland wrote:
> Shoot, yes I meant to include them from the start. Current vote is
>
> +1 3 Brock Noland, Jim Donofrio, Jarek Jarcec Cec
Shoot, yes I meant to include them from the start. Current vote is
+1 3 Brock Noland, Jim Donofrio, Jarek Jarcec Cecho
-1 0
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Jim Donofrio wrote:
> Brock,
>
> I guess you can email this up to general@incubator.apache.org now, right?
>
>
> On 04/17/2012 08:23 A
