Re: [VOTE] Release Empire-db 2.0.5

2009-08-21 Thread sebb
On 21/08/2009, Ralph Goers wrote: > > On Aug 21, 2009, at 6:05 AM, sebb wrote: > > > > On 21/08/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > > > > > About that assembly issue, running mvn assembly:assembly on the > > > assembly... I don't really think that makes sense. > > > > > > > > > > The archive is

Re: [VOTE] Release Empire-db 2.0.5

2009-08-21 Thread Ralph Goers
On Aug 21, 2009, at 6:05 AM, sebb wrote: On 21/08/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: About that assembly issue, running mvn assembly:assembly on the assembly... I don't really think that makes sense. The archive is supposed to contain the *full* source, i.e. whatever was used to create the

Re: [VOTE] Release Empire-db 2.0.5

2009-08-21 Thread sebb
On 21/08/2009, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:05 PM, sebb wrote: > > On 21/08/2009, Martijn Dashorst wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:52 PM, sebb wrote: > >> > There is only a combined source/binary archive, which is not standard > practise. > >> > All other projec

Re: [VOTE] Release Empire-db 2.0.5

2009-08-21 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:05 PM, sebb wrote: > On 21/08/2009, Martijn Dashorst wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:52 PM, sebb wrote: >>  > There is only a combined source/binary archive, which is not standard >> practise. >>  > All other projects release a source archive; almost all also release

Re: [VOTE] Release Empire-db 2.0.5

2009-08-21 Thread sebb
On 21/08/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > About that assembly issue, running mvn assembly:assembly on the > assembly... I don't really think that makes sense. > The archive is supposed to contain the *full* source, i.e. whatever was used to create the binary. It must be possible to recreate

Re: [VOTE] Release Empire-db 2.0.5

2009-08-21 Thread sebb
On 21/08/2009, sebb wrote: > On 21/08/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > > > So sebb, what tool are you using there to come up with all those issues ;-) > > > Scripts to download and unpack the archives. > Scripts to check sigs and hashes. > > WinMerge and > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/p

Re: [VOTE] Release Empire-db 2.0.5

2009-08-21 Thread Francis De Brabandere
About that assembly issue, running mvn assembly:assembly on the assembly... I don't really think that makes sense. On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:39 PM, sebb wrote: > On 21/08/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: >> So sebb, what tool are you using there to come up with all those issues ;-) > > Scripts

Re: [VOTE] Release Empire-db 2.0.5

2009-08-21 Thread sebb
On 21/08/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > So sebb, what tool are you using there to come up with all those issues ;-) Scripts to download and unpack the archives. Scripts to check sigs and hashes. WinMerge and https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/tools/releases/compare_dirs.pl Ey

Re: [VOTE] Release Empire-db 2.0.5

2009-08-21 Thread Francis De Brabandere
So sebb, what tool are you using there to come up with all those issues ;-) On the distribution file(s). Is this standard practice described somewhere. Can you suggest a model project that is using maven? If we have binaries separated should we also provide libraries in that zip? Since we moved t

Re: [VOTE] Release Empire-db 2.0.5

2009-08-21 Thread sebb
On 21/08/2009, Martijn Dashorst wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:52 PM, sebb wrote: > > There is only a combined source/binary archive, which is not standard > practise. > > All other projects release a source archive; almost all also release a > > separate binary archive. > > > FWIW, Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Empire-db 2.0.5

2009-08-21 Thread Martijn Dashorst
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:52 PM, sebb wrote: > There is only a combined source/binary archive, which is not standard > practise. > All other projects release a source archive; almost all also release a > separate binary archive. FWIW, Apache Wicket has released combined binary/source archives sin

Re: [VOTE] Release Empire-db 2.0.5

2009-08-21 Thread sebb
On 21/08/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote: > the tag is located here: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/empire-db/tags/empire-db-parent-2.0.5-incubating > > This is because our parent module is called empire-db-parent. Is this a > problem? I don't have a problem with the name. >

Re: [VOTE] Release Empire-db 2.0.5

2009-08-21 Thread sebb
On 21/08/2009, sebb wrote: > On 21/08/2009, Rainer Döbele wrote: > > > > The Empire-db community has completed working on Release 2.0.5 and is now > looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the release. > > So far the release has been approved by Empire-db committers, but due to > vacat

Re: [VOTE] Release Empire-db 2.0.5

2009-08-21 Thread Francis De Brabandere
the tag is located here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/empire-db/tags/empire-db-parent-2.0.5-incubating This is because our parent module is called empire-db-parent. Is this a problem? Francis On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 12:56 PM, sebb wrote: > On 21/08/2009, Rainer Döbele wrote: >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Empire-db 2.0.5

2009-08-21 Thread sebb
On 21/08/2009, Rainer Döbele wrote: > > The Empire-db community has completed working on Release 2.0.5 and is now > looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the release. > So far the release has been approved by Empire-db committers, but due to > vacation time and other circumstances the Me

[VOTE] Release Empire-db 2.0.5

2009-08-21 Thread Rainer Döbele
The Empire-db community has completed working on Release 2.0.5 and is now looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the release. So far the release has been approved by Empire-db committers, but due to vacation time and other circumstances the Mentors are unable to review the release. Hence i