+1
Re-checked the files. Look good to me.
Thanks,
Gunther.
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Hitesh Shah wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion, Sebb. I went ahead and moved the original SHA
> into .sha file and re-generated the SHA1 into the .sha1 file.
>
> @Alan, @sebb, would either of you mind
Hello all,
Closing the vote since 72 hours have passed.
With the required 3 IPMC votes and no -1s, this vote passes.
+1s (binding - IPMC )
Arun C Murthy
Alan Gates
Mahadev Konar
+1s (non-binding)
Hitesh Shah
Chen He
Daniel Dai
Tsuyoshi Ozawa
Rohini Palaniswamy
Jonathan Eagles
Siddharth Seth
J
Thanks for verifying it, @sebb.
Just left it in there for now in case anyone wanted to double check. I will
skip moving it when I migrate the bits to the release area.
thanks
-- Hitesh
On Feb 28, 2014, at 4:45 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 28 February 2014 21:44, Hitesh Shah wrote:
>> Thanks for the
On 28 February 2014 21:44, Hitesh Shah wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion, Sebb. I went ahead and moved the original SHA into
> .sha file and re-generated the SHA1 into the .sha1 file.
>
> @Alan, @sebb, would either of you mind verifying the modified files?
.sha1 now looks OK.
Not sure its wort
Thanks for the suggestion, Sebb. I went ahead and moved the original SHA into
.sha file and re-generated the SHA1 into the .sha1 file.
@Alan, @sebb, would either of you mind verifying the modified files?
I will follow-up separately with other folks who did their +1's to re-check the
files.
th
On 28 February 2014 19:48, Alan Gates wrote:
> +1
>
> One note is that the signatures given say sha1, but you actually have use
> openssl sha to get the same values. If you do sha1sum (which was my first
> assumption anyway) you get a different non-matching values. You might want
> to change
+1
One note is that the signatures given say sha1, but you actually have use
openssl sha to get the same values. If you do sha1sum (which was my first
assumption anyway) you get a different non-matching values. You might want to
change the filename to "tez-0.3.0-incubating.tar.gz.sha”
Othe
+1 (binding)
- verified signatures and ran some sample test jobs.
Mahadev Konar
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Jason Lowe wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> - Verified signatures
> - Built from source, installed on single-node cluster
> - Ran some sampl
+1 (non-binding)
- Verified signatures
- Built from source, installed on single-node cluster
- Ran some sample Tez jobs
Jason
On 02/25/2014 06:28 PM, Hitesh Shah wrote:
Hello folks,
I have created a tez-0.3.0-incubating release candidate (rc1). This is the
second release for Tez.
The previ
+1 (non-binding)
On Feb 27, 2014 7:25 PM, "Arun Murthy" wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Arun
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt fr
+1
Verified checksums, signature. Built, installed and tried a couple of Tez
and MR jobs.
On 2/27/14, 5:35 PM, "Jonathan Eagles" wrote:
>+1 (non-binding)
>On Feb 27, 2014 7:25 PM, "Arun Murthy" wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Arun
>>
>> --
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>> NOTICE: This message is in
+1 (binding)
Arun
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the
Hello folks,
I have created a tez-0.3.0-incubating release candidate (rc1). This is the
second release for Tez.
The previous RC was cancelled due to a bug discovered when the RC was tested
against downstream projects.
GIT source tag:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-tez/repo?
13 matches
Mail list logo
