You may use apache-opendal-incubating-0.34.0-src.tag.gz instead.
Best,
tison.
Xuanwo 于2023年5月23日周二 13:06写道：
> Oh, my mistake, thank you all!
>
> On Tue, May 23, 2023, at 13:02, Justin Mclean wrote:
> > HI,
> >
> >>> - “incubating" is not in the release name
> >>
> >> Could you please explain t
Oh, my mistake, thank you all!
On Tue, May 23, 2023, at 13:02, Justin Mclean wrote:
> HI,
>
>>> - “incubating" is not in the release name
>>
>> Could you please explain the phrase "not in the release name"? Our release
>> includes the term "incubating," such as
>> "apache-incubator-opendal-0.34
HI,
>> - “incubating" is not in the release name
>
> Could you please explain the phrase "not in the release name"? Our release
> includes the term "incubating," such as
> "apache-incubator-opendal-0.34.0-src.tar.gz.”
That's “incubator” not “incubating”.
Kind Regards,
Justin
--
I think you put incubator rather than incubating.
Xuanwo 于2023年5月23日 周二08:34写道：
> Hi,
>
> > - “incubating" is not in the release name
>
> Could you please explain the phrase "not in the release name"? Our release
> includes the term "incubating," such as
> "apache-incubator-opendal-0.34.0-src.tar
Hi,
> - “incubating" is not in the release name
Could you please explain the phrase "not in the release name"? Our release
includes the term "incubating," such as
"apache-incubator-opendal-0.34.0-src.tar.gz."
On Mon, May 22, 2023, at 08:44, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry, but it -1 bindi
Thanks!
I apologize for providing unverified information. The images in question are
sourced from https://undraw.co. However, the license for these illustrations
does not permit us to redistribute them. We will take steps to rectify this
issue.
On Tue, May 23, 2023, at 07:18, Justin Mclean wro
Hi,
>> - Where did these files come from, and how are they licensed?[1][2][3]
>
> We have drawn them ourselves, and they are all licensed under Apache 2.0.
> Should we include any additional notes for them?
I’m sorry but a a google image search shows otherwise. From the style (and file
names)
Thanks a lot for the checks!
> - Where did these files come from, and how are they licensed?[1][2][3]
We have drawn them ourselves, and they are all licensed under Apache 2.0.
Should we include any additional notes for them?
The other issues have been acknowledged and will be addressed in our n
Hi,
Sorry, but it -1 binding from me, LICENSE and NOTICE need to be corrected and
the lease artefacts need incubating in the name.
I checked:
- “incubating" is not in the release name
- signatures and hash are fine
- LICENSE and NOTICE are not correct, LICENSE information goes in LICENSE not
NO
The LICENSE file communicates the licensing of all content in an
Apache product distribution.
It always contains the text of the Apache License and sometimes more
information.[1]
NOTICE file is used for required third-party notices [2]。
If we do the source release， we only include the bundled third
>These License information should be put into the License file.
Any requirement for this statement?
In ASF projects I involve, I always put dependencies info in the NOTICE
file and leave the LICENSE file AS IS from
https://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt.
Best,
tison.
Willem Jiang 于2023年5
I checked the NOTICE file, it includs the third-party dependencies
license information.
These License information should be put into the License file.
Some third-party dependency Licenses are Apache or MIT, we can choose
Apache License by default.
I cannot find how to build from the README.md fil
+1(binding)
[x] Download links are valid.
[x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
[x] LICENSE files exist.
[x] NOTICE is included. (checked included dependencies, years etc.).
[x] DISCLAIMER is included.
[x] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[x] All source
+1 (binding)
I checked:
+ Download links are valid.
+ Checksums and signatures - although the SIGNING KEY has multiple entries,
it contains xua...@apache.org so I think it's OK.
+ LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
+ DISCLAIMER files exist
+ No unexpected binary files
+ All source files have ASF headers
Hello Incubator PMC,
The Apache OpenDAL community has voted and approved the release of Apache
OpenDAL(incubating) 0.34.0-rc1. We now kindly request the IPMC members
review and vote for this release.
OpenDAL is a data access layer that allows users to easily and efficiently
retrieve data from var
15 matches
Mail list logo
