+1 for the workload :)
2013/2/4 Simone Tripodi
> Hi all,
>
> More than 72 hours have passed and the current vote thread can be
> considered concluded and passes with the following resolution:
>
> three +1 binding votes from the following IPMCs:
>
> * Olivier Lamy
> * Christian Grobmeier
> *
Hi all,
More than 72 hours have passed and the current vote thread can be
considered concluded and passes with the following resolution:
three +1 binding votes from the following IPMCs:
* Olivier Lamy
* Christian Grobmeier
* Mohammad Nour El-Din
no other votes have been casted.
I am going to
On 04.02.2013 01:05, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
> Hi Branko...
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>
>> On 03.02.2013 21:26, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Just to be clear, in the case of Onami Logging, reviewers are asked to
find the right package amongst 8 differe
Hi Branko...
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 03.02.2013 21:26, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> >> Just to be clear, in the case of Onami Logging, reviewers are asked to
> >> find the right package amongst 8 different source packages in 8
> >> different directories.
> > W
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Good morning IPMC,
>
> The Apache Onami community has voted[1] the release of Apache
> Onami-Logging 3.4.0-incubating, collecting two IPMC votes from members
> Olivier Lamy and Christian Grobmeier.
>
> This is the changelist:
On 03.02.2013 21:26, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> Just to be clear, in the case of Onami Logging, reviewers are asked to
>> find the right package amongst 8 different source packages in 8
>> different directories.
> What do you mean with "right"? They all are "right", because they
> contain diffe
Hi Brane,
thanks a lot for reviewing Onami releases, much more than appreciated!
> Since when do source packages not have to be on dist.apache.org?
We usually copy source packages release after the vote passes.
> In other words, the reason you're not getting votes from the IPMC is
> that it's w
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 02.02.2013 21:36, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 23.01.2013 14:48, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>>> SVN source tag
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/onami/tags/org.apache.onami.logging.parent-3.4.0-incubating/
>>>
>>> Staging repo:
>>> htt
On 02.02.2013 21:36, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 23.01.2013 14:48, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> SVN source tag
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/onami/tags/org.apache.onami.logging.parent-3.4.0-incubating/
>>
>> Staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheonami
On 23.01.2013 14:48, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> SVN source tag
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/onami/tags/org.apache.onami.logging.parent-3.4.0-incubating/
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheonami-150/
Since when do source packages not have to
Good morning IPMC,
The Apache Onami community has voted[1] the release of Apache
Onami-Logging 3.4.0-incubating, collecting two IPMC votes from members
Olivier Lamy and Christian Grobmeier.
This is the changelist:
Bug
[ONAMI-28] - Do not use code from com.google.inject.internal
Dependency upgra
11 matches
Mail list logo
