+1
On Mar 30, 2009, at 6:09 PM, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE wrote:
This is the first binary release of the Apache Olio project.
We have fixed many bugs and have tested the releases to ensure there
are no major problems.
All package names have been changed to org.apache.olio. We have
updated
I did basic checking of the candidate and the RAT report and based on that I
vote +1
Sorry, that it took me a while.
Ciao
Henning
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 09:23, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE <
shanti.subraman...@sun.com> wrote:
> The Olio community has voted and approved this first binar
I need one more +1 PMC member vote to get this release out.
Can someone else please vote ?
The mail thread is here :
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200904.mbox/ajax/%3c49e60a04.6020...@sun.com%3e
Shanti
On 04/23/09 08:55, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2
Thanks for the reversal of the -1. But I still need a +1 ?
Shanti
sebb wrote:
On 23/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 23/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE
wrote:
On 04/22/09 10:35, sebb wrote:
On 16/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 4:39 AM, sebb wrote:
On 23/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam wrote:
sebb wrote:
But seriously, without these
files, we will have to somehow go out and manufacture image/pdf files at
install time - uploading files is a big p
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 4:39 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 23/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam wrote:
>> sebb wrote:
>> But seriously, without these
>> files, we will have to somehow go out and manufacture image/pdf files at
>> install time - uploading files is a big part of a web2.0 workload these days
>>
On 23/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
> > On 23/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On 04/22/09 10:35, sebb wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > On 16/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE
> > > >
> > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > On 04/15/09 18:1
sebb wrote:
On 23/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE wrote:
On 04/22/09 10:35, sebb wrote:
On 16/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE
wrote:
On 04/15/09 18:15, sebb wrote:
On 16/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam wrote:
Thank you very much for your very
On 23/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE wrote:
> On 04/22/09 10:35, sebb wrote:
>
> > On 16/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE
> wrote:
> >
> > > On 04/15/09 18:15, sebb wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > On 16/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Thank you very much for your very
On 04/22/09 10:35, sebb wrote:
On 16/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE wrote:
On 04/15/09 18:15, sebb wrote:
On 16/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam wrote:
Thank you very much for your very prompt review.
Answers to your questions below.
Shanti
sebb wrote:
The OlioDriver.jar file contain
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE
wrote:
> It has been a week since I sent this request for a VOTE. Craig and sebb have
> reviewed it.
> Would really appreciate if someone else can take a look and vote.
i've just taken a look and it looks ok to me but i'd like to hear the
On 16/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE wrote:
> On 04/15/09 18:15, sebb wrote:
>
> > On 16/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam wrote:
> >
> > > Thank you very much for your very prompt review.
> > > Answers to your questions below.
> > >
> > > Shanti
> > >
> > > sebb wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > The Ol
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Olio 0.1
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:20:32 -0700
From: Shanti Subramanyam - PAE
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org, shanti.subraman...@sun.com
Organization: Sun Microsystems
To: general@incubator.apache.org
References: <49e60a04.6020...@sun.com>
Here i
On 04/15/09 18:15, sebb wrote:
On 16/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam wrote:
Thank you very much for your very prompt review.
Answers to your questions below.
Shanti
sebb wrote:
The OlioDriver.jar file contains a smaller OlioDriver.jar file.
This is very confusing; one of the jars should be r
On 16/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam wrote:
> Thank you very much for your very prompt review.
> Answers to your questions below.
>
> Shanti
>
> sebb wrote:
>
> > The OlioDriver.jar file contains a smaller OlioDriver.jar file.
> > This is very confusing; one of the jars should be renamed.
> >
> >
Thank you very much for your very prompt review.
Answers to your questions below.
Shanti
sebb wrote:
The OlioDriver.jar file contains a smaller OlioDriver.jar file.
This is very confusing; one of the jars should be renamed.
This is the format of the Faban (http://faban.sunsource.net) Driver
On 15/04/2009, sebb wrote:
> On 15/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE wrote:
> > Here is some additional information :
> >
> > . The following people have cast their Vote in favor of this release:
> >
> > - Committers; Akara Sucharitakul, William Sobel, Sheetal Patel,
> > Shanti Subraman
On 15/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE wrote:
> Here is some additional information :
>
> . The following people have cast their Vote in favor of this release:
>
> - Committers; Akara Sucharitakul, William Sobel, Sheetal Patel,
> Shanti Subramanyam
> - Additional users/developers: Amanda Wa
Here is some additional information :
. The following people have cast their Vote in favor of this release:
- Committers; Akara Sucharitakul, William Sobel, Sheetal Patel,
Shanti Subramanyam
- Additional users/developers: Amanda Waite,
- Mentors: Craig Russell
. Craig has reviewed the lic
The Olio community has voted and approved this first binary release of
Olio. We are now asking for a Vote of the Incubator PMC to publish this
release.
The release includes both the PHP and Rails versions of Olio.
The release artificats and RAT reports are available here :
http://people.apache
As I understand it, no.
The files need to be called LICENSE and NOTICE or possibly NOTICE.txt etc.
S.
On 31/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam wrote:
> Since we have two packages with different LICENSE and NOTICE files, is it
> okay to name them as follows :
> . LICENSE_php.txt, NOTICE_php.txt
> . L
Since we have two packages with different LICENSE and NOTICE files, is
it okay to name them as follows :
. LICENSE_php.txt, NOTICE_php.txt
. LICENSE_rails.txt, NOTICE_rails.txt
Shanti
Craig L Russell wrote:
On Mar 31, 2009, at 12:01 PM, sebb wrote:
I'm not convinced that the license permits
On 31/03/2009, Craig L Russell wrote:
>
> On Mar 31, 2009, at 12:01 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>
> > I'm not convinced that the license permits Ruby code to be added to SVN.
> >
> > Here is the a reference I found to the use of works under the Ruby
> license:
> >
> > http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.h
On Mar 31, 2009, at 12:01 PM, sebb wrote:
I'm not convinced that the license permits Ruby code to be added to
SVN.
Here is the a reference I found to the use of works under the Ruby
license:
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
This does not allows projects to include Ruby-licensed
On 31/03/2009, Craig L Russell wrote:
>
> On Mar 31, 2009, at 9:21 AM, Shanti Subramanyam wrote:
>
>
> > Craig L Russell wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Mar 31, 2009, at 8:18 AM, sebb wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > All package names have been changed to org.apach
On Mar 31, 2009, at 9:21 AM, Shanti Subramanyam wrote:
Craig L Russell wrote:
On Mar 31, 2009, at 8:18 AM, sebb wrote:
All package names have been changed to org.apache.olio. We have
updated
many source license/header files and added the LICENSE, NOTICE
files.
However, the RAT report
On 31/03/2009, sebb wrote:
> On 31/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam wrote:
>
> > Craig L Russell wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Mar 31, 2009, at 8:18 AM, sebb wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > All package names have been changed to org.apache.olio. We have
> >
On 31/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam wrote:
> Craig L Russell wrote:
>
> >
> > On Mar 31, 2009, at 8:18 AM, sebb wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > All package names have been changed to org.apache.olio. We have
> updated
> > > > > > many source license/header files and added
Craig L Russell wrote:
On Mar 31, 2009, at 8:18 AM, sebb wrote:
All package names have been changed to org.apache.olio. We have
updated
many source license/header files and added the LICENSE, NOTICE files.
However, the RAT report shows that there are lots of files without the
correct heade
On 31/03/2009, sebb wrote:
> On 31/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam wrote:
> > sebb wrote:
> >
> > > On 30/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > This is the first binary release of the Apache Olio project.
> > > > We have fixed many bugs and have tested the release
On 31/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
> > On 30/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > This is the first binary release of the Apache Olio project.
> > > We have fixed many bugs and have tested the releases to ensure there
> are no
> > > major problems.
> > >
On 31/03/2009, Craig L Russell wrote:
>
> On Mar 31, 2009, at 8:18 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>
> > On 31/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam wrote:
> >
> > > sebb wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > On 30/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE
> > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > This is the first bi
On Mar 31, 2009, at 8:18 AM, sebb wrote:
On 31/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 30/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE
wrote:
This is the first binary release of the Apache Olio project.
We have fixed many bugs and have tested the releases to ensure
there
are no
maj
On 31/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
> > On 30/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > This is the first binary release of the Apache Olio project.
> > > We have fixed many bugs and have tested the releases to ensure there
> are no
> > > major problems.
> > >
On 31/03/2009, Craig L Russell wrote:
> Hi Sebb,
>
> Thanks for taking a look. The artifacts were uploaded prematurely and will
> be taken down.
>
> A couple of comments below as well...
>
> On Mar 31, 2009, at 4:22 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>
> > On 30/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE
> wrote:
> >
>
Hi Sebb,
Thanks for taking a look. The artifacts were uploaded prematurely and
will be taken down.
A couple of comments below as well...
On Mar 31, 2009, at 4:22 AM, sebb wrote:
On 30/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE
wrote:
This is the first binary release of the Apache Olio project.
W
Sorry about that. This was because of my lack of understanding of the
process. I have removed the link now and will re-distribute artifacts
after approval.
Shanti
sebb wrote:
I've just noticed that the download links for 0.1 are already in place at
http://incubator.apache.org/olio/downloads.
sebb wrote:
On 30/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE wrote:
This is the first binary release of the Apache Olio project.
We have fixed many bugs and have tested the releases to ensure there are no
major problems.
All package names have been changed to org.apache.olio. We have updated
many
I've just noticed that the download links for 0.1 are already in place at
http://incubator.apache.org/olio/downloads.html
and seem to be working.
I thought the release vote had to succeed before publishing anything?
See:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#release-distribu
On 30/03/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE wrote:
> This is the first binary release of the Apache Olio project.
> We have fixed many bugs and have tested the releases to ensure there are no
> major problems.
>
> All package names have been changed to org.apache.olio. We have updated
> many source
Re-sending with corrected alias.
Shanti
Original Message
Subject:[VOTE] Release Apache Olio 0.1
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:09:57 -0700
From: Shanti Subramanyam - PAE
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org, shanti.subraman...@sun.com
Organization: Sun
This is the first binary release of the Apache Olio project.
We have fixed many bugs and have tested the releases to ensure there are
no major problems.
All package names have been changed to org.apache.olio. We have updated
many source license/header files and added the LICENSE, NOTICE files.
42 matches
Mail list logo
