Yeah... kind of hard for me to vote while I was on vacation last week.
Didn't happen, but that is not a problem.
As Justin notes, our job is to *mentor* ... that doesn't mean we are
obligated to vote. Voting on a release implies a large commitment to
downloading the tarball, building, deploying, t
As a podling member, who's been observing here for a couple of months I
have a question here:
What are the principles the incubator uses to decide whether or not to
accept a podling? I know there are a few questions that all podlings have
to answer when creating their proposal, but I haven't actu
Hi,
> I'm still interested in figuring out how to build this thing
The easiest way to to compile the newt package (by tuning build.sh) first and
then use the produced “newt” binary to compile the blinky project via
instructions in the read me.
> - You're trying to release "Apache Mynewt" but n
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Sterling Hughes wrote:
>> I just want to clarify here on the thread —- while I think in general there
>> may be problems with too many podlings/inactive mentors, that is not an
>> issue we often face.
>
> J
I will admit to being somewhat of a quiet mentor for Mynewt, particularly with
respect to vetting releases. I have been monitoring the community and signing
off on reports.
I've often seen more experienced mentors vote on releases, and held back on
voting based on trust in them. I'll try to do
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Sterling Hughes wrote:
> I just want to clarify here on the thread —- while I think in general there
> may be problems with too many podlings/inactive mentors, that is not an
> issue we often face.
Justin Mclean has voted on so many releases over the last several
Hi,
> as always, snapshots in time is not as useful as trending data over time. I
> guess it is time to take a look at whimsy.. :-)
http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e
On 05/28/2016 05:31 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> And where is the sources for that?
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/comdev/projects.apache.org/
With regards,
Daniel.
>
> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>
>> On 05/28/2016 05:25 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>>> Thanks Justin,
And where is the sources for that?
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> On 05/28/2016 05:25 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> > Thanks Justin,
> > as always, snapshots in time is not as useful as trending data over
> time. I
> > guess it is time to take a look at whimsy.. :-)
>
> Or
On 05/28/2016 05:25 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> Thanks Justin,
> as always, snapshots in time is not as useful as trending data over time. I
> guess it is time to take a look at whimsy.. :-)
Or projects.apache.org :) Since there's already an incubator chart there
- should be easy to add another on
Thanks Justin,
as always, snapshots in time is not as useful as trending data over time. I
guess it is time to take a look at whimsy.. :-)
Cheers
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > An additional graph that would be super-interesting to get is "Months in
> > Incuba
Hi,
> An additional graph that would be super-interesting to get is "Months in
> Incubation" for the current podlings, plotted over time.
Some of the data can be found here [1] (column B)
Thanks,
Justin
1. http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html
Hey John,
I think the VOTE should be recalled based upon looking at newt. I’ll
admit — all my testing was on the git tags for the release, and not
the tarballs themselves. As a FYI, what happened is that only the newt
directory got released in newt tarball instead of the TLD:
https://github.
I'm still interested in figuring out how to build this thing, however I
feel that I need to vote -1 on the release on the following grounds:
- You're trying to release "Apache Mynewt" but not a single one of these
packages says "Mynewt" on them. Even the generated binary says "newt" and
not Mynew
I just want to clarify here on the thread —- while I think in general
there may be problems with too many podlings/inactive mentors, that is
not an issue we often face.
It is simply that this release came at a time when some of our mentors
were busy, and we want to get a release out the door—
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 6:05 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> I can agree that there's an issue with the overall number of podlings
> around. However, I don't agree with telling a podling that the IPMC isn't
> going to look at your vote and that your mentors should do that.
Well, a quick recap of the
I can agree that there's an issue with the overall number of podlings
around. However, I don't agree with telling a podling that the IPMC isn't
going to look at your vote and that your mentors should do that.
The funny thing though, MyNewt has more than the recommended 3 mentors, yet
this is stil
Hi Christopher,
I'm happy to take a look at the release. Its probably a bit hard since it
seems like its not buildable.
Your instructions seem to be "newt test all" When I run that I get
Johns-MBP-2:apache-newt-0.9.0-incubating johnament$ newt test go
-bash: newt: command not found
I'm used
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> I respectfully disagree... One of the main reasons we went from 1 to 3
> recommended mentors, way back in the days, was that those 3 would be the
> primary people to ping for binding votes, without limiting the rest of the
> IPMC to do so.
I respectfully disagree... One of the main reasons we went from 1 to 3
recommended mentors, way back in the days, was that those 3 would be the
primary people to ping for binding votes, without limiting the rest of the
IPMC to do so.
If that is no longer the consensus, then we need to look at the
Hi,
> I think you need to ping your mentors, and if they are not able, then I
> think you need to raise this as an issue with the Incubator PMC, either in
> separate thread or put it in the report for next month.
AFAIK it's not the responsibility of the mentors to vote, it's the
responsibility o
I think you need to ping your mentors, and if they are not able, then I
think you need to raise this as an issue with the Incubator PMC, either in
separate thread or put it in the report for next month.
I am not on the PMC, and can't help at this point.
Niclas
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 7:18 AM, Ste
Hi,
It’s been 5 days since the start of the vote thread — we’re
waiting on 2 more votes +1 — already passed podling PMC.
Can folks jump in?
Thanks,
Sterling
On 25 May 2016, at 7:58, Sterling Hughes wrote:
Hi All,
Trying to get this out, we have one +1 binding vote on general@ (from
me),
Hi All,
Trying to get this out, we have one +1 binding vote on general@ (from
me), and need _2_ more votes.
The release has passed the podling PMC unanimously -- please help us get
this out, as we're approaching the end of the vote window (we may be
past it.) This is the 4th release we're
Hello all,
I would like to make an open request to the PMC community: if you have
the time, could you please take a look at this release candidate and
cast a vote? This release contains some critical bug fixes, so we would
like to release it if possible.
I can tell from all the traffic that ther
+1 binding carries over mynewt dev list
Ship it!
> On May 22, 2016, at 11:52 AM, Christopher Collins wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> The Apache Mynewt Incubator PPMC has approved a proposal to release
> Apache Mynewt 0.9.0-incubating. We now kindly request that the Incubator
> PMC members review and v
Hello,
The Apache Mynewt Incubator PPMC has approved a proposal to release
Apache Mynewt 0.9.0-incubating. We now kindly request that the Incubator
PMC members review and vote on this incubator release.
Apache Mynewt is a community-driven, permissively licensed open source
initiative for constrai
27 matches
Mail list logo
