Hi all,
Thank you very much for those who verified this release and voted.
The vote passes with 4 binding IPMC +1 votes and no 0s or -1s. Since
the 72 hours deadline has passed, this vote is now closed.
Binding +1 votes:
* Alan Gates
* Arun C Murthy
* Joe Witt
* Justin Mclean
We will proceed t
Hi Justin,
Thank you for trying out.
Understood the reasoning behind including build instructions in the
README. This was raised by Joe as well. We will file a JIRA to handle
this in the next release.
Thanks
Hemanth
On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 7:17 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 binding
>
Hi,
+1 binding
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signature and hashes good
- disclaimer exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE good
- all source file have ASF header
- no unexpected binaries in source release
- can compile from source
You may may to move the build instructions to the README as well as havi
Thank you for trying out, Joe!
Responses inline.
On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 4:22 AM, Joe Witt wrote:
> +1 (bindng).
>
> Conducted a review focused largely on mechanics of the source release
> and licensing. Findings as follows:
>
> good
> - hashes check out
> - signature checks out
> - source relea
Thank you for trying out, Alan.
We will address the tests issue by filing JIRAs for the next release.
A majority of us on the dev team have been using JDK 1.7 on Mac and
tests pass with this - which we verified before putting out the
release. It may be a JDK 1.8 specific issue, which we should add
+1 (bindng).
Conducted a review focused largely on mechanics of the source release
and licensing. Findings as follows:
good
- hashes check out
- signature checks out
- source release license/notice/3party license references look great!
nicely done
- full clean build w/out tests + apache-rat:chec
+1 (binding)
Arun
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Alan Gates wrote:
> +1.
>
> I checked the LICENSE, DISCLAIMER, and NOTICE files. Checked that there
> were no binary files in the distribution (there are images, but that seems
> ok). Checked the signatures. Did a build with a fresh local mav
+1.
I checked the LICENSE, DISCLAIMER, and NOTICE files. Checked that there were
no binary files in the distribution (there are images, but that seems ok).
Checked the signatures. Did a build with a fresh local maven repo with
-DskipTests set.
When I built with tests it failed with:
Running
Hi all,
This is a call for a vote on the Apache Atlas 0.7-incubating release
(release candidate RC2).
A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 7 +1s.
Vote thread: https://s.apache.org/Czm4
Results thread: https://s.apache.org/PAeO
The source tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.
Thanks Justin for verifying
We have used sha512 already. We need to remove glyphicons font. We will
also fix the LICENSE and NOTICE and get back. Thanks!
Regards,
Shwetha
On 28/06/16, 10:40 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>-1 (binding) until font license clarified.
>
>The glypicons font
Hi,
-1 (binding) until font license clarified.
The glypicons font is normally a commercially licensed font which is not
compatible with the Apache license [9], under certain conditions (i.e. shipped
with bootstrap) it’s MIT (bottom of same page) but I don’t see that here.
Also please fix for t
Hi All,
This is a call for a vote on the Apache Atlas 0.7 incubating release.
A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 10 +1's.
Vote thread: https://s.apache.org/r1o6
Results thread: https://s.apache.org/L3fE
The source tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5,
12 matches
Mail list logo
