This vote passes with 3 binding +1's (Justin, Jitendra, Josh) and
nothing else.
Thanks, all.
On 11/5/18 2:09 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
IPMC,
Please vote on the following release candidate to become Apache Ratis
Thirdparty 0.1.0.
You may find the PPMC VOTE thread at
https://lists.apache.org/thre
+1 (binding)
verified signatures
LICENSE and NOTICE look good
ASF headers good
Builds from the source.
On 11/9/18, 11:42 AM, "Josh Elser" wrote:
Thanks, Justin.
Will take an action-item for the file extensions.
On 11/8/18 11:09 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
Thanks, Justin.
Will take an action-item for the file extensions.
On 11/8/18 11:09 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signature and hashes fine, but you may want to check the file extensions as
policy changed a little while back to what was allowed
-
Hi,
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signature and hashes fine, but you may want to check the file extensions as
policy changed a little while back to what was allowed
- LICENSE and NOTICE good
- no binary files
- no source files, but poms have ASF headers
- can compile from “sourc
Hi,
> And on that note: those 72hours elapses today. Any IPMC votes would be
> greatly appreciated!
Your mentors are IPMC member and can vote on this release, given it basically
contains nothing I’m not sure why they haven’t.
Thanks,
Justin
-
Looks like I forgot to include duration in my initial message. Of
course, this will run for at least the customary 72hours.
And on that note: those 72hours elapses today. Any IPMC votes would be
greatly appreciated!
- Josh
On 11/5/18 2:09 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
IPMC,
Please vote on the foll
IPMC,
Please vote on the following release candidate to become Apache Ratis
Thirdparty 0.1.0.
You may find the PPMC VOTE thread at
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/000d9c6f69b6ddcda5391134df8666c7df83193dd01b97218579069c@%3Cdev.ratis.apache.org%3E,
with the RESULT at
https://lists.apache.
