The changes look good to me. Safe travels.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 7:23 PM Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> Please find below the corrected version of the proposed resolution:
> * corrected first paragraph to agree with the 3rd
> * added last paragraph (releasing incubator)
> * corrected before la
Please find below the corrected version of the proposed resolution:
* corrected first paragraph to agree with the 3rd
* added last paragraph (releasing incubator)
* corrected before last paragraph (migration task)
Since I am getting paranoid, a nod from other pairs of eyes would be
highly app
Indeed, if Hadrian had succeeded in editing during the meeting, it would
have been fixed right then. Murphy weighed in and we have a 4 week delay.
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 4:03 AM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> Ah ha. It wasn't clear from the original email this happened during the
> board meeting.
Ah ha. It wasn't clear from the original email this happened during the
board meeting. Now I get it.
On Oct 21, 2015 23:09, "Marvin Humphrey" wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:58 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
>
> > I think that's my point. Those two weeks should be used to get incubator
> > app
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 4:43 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Any reason you need 4 weeks to add the paragraph back?..
4 weeks is to get the board to vote on the resolution - our meeting
was yesterday and the next one is on November 18.
As Hadrian says, It is unfortunate that nobody caught that, we no
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:58 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> I think that's my point. Those two weeks should be used to get incubator
> approval. If you wait 4 weeks you don't graduate until December.
The Incubator isn't going to vote again. The text of the graduation
resolution from an Incubator
On Oct 21, 2015 22:48, "Greg Stein" wrote:
>
> Several things: the description of the project in para 1 and 3 do not
> match. Second, the wording of the (current) last paragraph doesn't refer
to
> "podling" like other Incubator graduation resolutions. Third, the final
> paragraph from the template
Several things: the description of the project in para 1 and 3 do not
match. Second, the wording of the (current) last paragraph doesn't refer to
"podling" like other Incubator graduation resolutions. Third, the final
paragraph from the template, releasing the Incubator from responsibility.
See th
Any reason you need 4 weeks to add the paragraph back?
On Oct 21, 2015 21:09, "Hadrian Zbarcea" wrote:
> The resolution to graduate Apache Brooklyn out of the incubator was tabled
> due to a procedural issue. This has nothing to do with the code or the
> community.
>
> The reason was an editorial
The resolution to graduate Apache Brooklyn out of the incubator was
tabled due to a procedural issue. This has nothing to do with the code
or the community.
The reason was an editorial error on my side, I used the wrong template
and the last paragraph releasing the incubator from its responsib
+1 (binding)
including the PMC+= of jbonofre of course :)
good luck and LieGrue,
strub
> Am 28.09.2015 um 16:06 schrieb Hadrian Zbarcea :
>
> This is the Incubator vote to decide if Apache Brooklyn should graduate from
> the Incubator. Please see the proposed resolution below.
>
> See also
Vote passes with:
+1 - 6 binding (ke4qqq, jbonofre, jzb, johndament, olamy, hadrian)
+1 - 2 non-binding
-1 - 0
We will submit the proposal below to the board for approval (including
jbonofre and olamy in the PMC).
Many thanks again to our mentors and the incubator in general for the
guidance
+1 from me too.
Hadrian
On 09/28/2015 10:06 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
This is the Incubator vote to decide if Apache Brooklyn should graduate
from the Incubator. Please see the proposed resolution below.
See also discuss thread [1]. Mentors were invited to join the future TLP
PMC on request. I
Ack
* Olivier Lamy
Thanks,
Hadrian
On 09/29/2015 08:15 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
+1 (binding)
I'd like to remain on PMC and try to help in the future.
Olivier
On 29 September 2015 at 00:06, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
This is the Incubator vote to decide if Apache Brooklyn should graduat
+1 (binding)
I'd like to remain on PMC and try to help in the future.
Olivier
On 29 September 2015 at 00:06, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> This is the Incubator vote to decide if Apache Brooklyn should graduate
> from the Incubator. Please see the proposed resolution below.
>
> See also discuss thre
+1
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:06 AM Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> This is the Incubator vote to decide if Apache Brooklyn should graduate
> from the Incubator. Please see the proposed resolution below.
>
> See also discuss thread [1]. Mentors were invited to join the future TLP
> PMC on request. Invi
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015, at 08:32 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> In hindsight, the cc: to dev@brooklyn created more confusion. This is
> the incubator vote. I think we should drop the cc: to dev@ (kept it for
> this email, to make sure Joe sees it).
D'oh. Thanks!
> On 09/29/2015 07:49 AM, Joe Brockm
Ack. We will add
* Jean-Baptiste Onofré
as a PMC member in the final resolution.
Hadrian
On 09/29/2015 08:28 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
By the way, I would like to stay PMC on Brooklyn and try to help.
Regards
JB
On 09/29/2015 12:54 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
+1 (bindi
In hindsight, the cc: to dev@brooklyn created more confusion. This is
the incubator vote. I think we should drop the cc: to dev@ (kept it for
this email, to make sure Joe sees it).
Thanks,
Hadrian
On 09/29/2015 07:49 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015, at 10:06 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea
By the way, I would like to stay PMC on Brooklyn and try to help.
Regards
JB
On 09/29/2015 12:54 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On 09/28/2015 04:06 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
This is the Incubator vote to decide if Apache Brooklyn should graduate
from the Incubator.
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On 09/28/2015 04:06 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
This is the Incubator vote to decide if Apache Brooklyn should graduate
from the Incubator. Please see the proposed resolution below.
See also discuss thread [1]. Mentors were invited to join the future TLP
PMC on request.
+1 (binding)
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> This is the Incubator vote to decide if Apache Brooklyn should graduate from
> the Incubator. Please see the proposed resolution below.
>
> See also discuss thread [1]. Mentors were invited to join the future TLP PMC
> on req
+1
On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 at 16:24 Andrea Turli
wrote:
> +1
>
> On 28 September 2015 at 16:06, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>
> > This is the Incubator vote to decide if Apache Brooklyn should graduate
> > from the Incubator. Please see the proposed resolution below.
> >
> > See also discuss thread [1].
+1
On 28 September 2015 at 16:06, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> This is the Incubator vote to decide if Apache Brooklyn should graduate
> from the Incubator. Please see the proposed resolution below.
>
> See also discuss thread [1]. Mentors were invited to join the future TLP
> PMC on request. Invita
This is the Incubator vote to decide if Apache Brooklyn should graduate
from the Incubator. Please see the proposed resolution below.
See also discuss thread [1]. Mentors were invited to join the future TLP
PMC on request. Invitation is open until this vote is closed.
This vote is open for at
25 matches
Mail list logo
