Hi,
The vote has passed with the following results:
+1 (binding): Tim Williams, Ant Elder, Olivier Lamy
+1 (non binding): Raffaele P. Guidi, Benoit Perroud, Simone Tripodi.
Vote threads:
* http://markmail.org/message/vyo3jnpjsl3fk3vz
* http://markmail.org/message/uf56m5kyqnowqm67
I will continue
I note the issues mention by Sebb but I'm giving this a +1.
Both JQuery and bootstrap are included in the source release so they need
to be mentioned in the LICENSE file and they are so thats correct. No one
ever seems that sure about when and what to mention in the NOTICE file,
those two are ment
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 4:52 AM, sebb wrote:
> AIUI, it's very simple:
> - the full license should be included in the LICENSE file
> - if a license requires attribution, then the required attribution
> (only) needs to go in the NOTICE file.
> - if a license does not _require_ attribution, then the
So finally move to get js files from various cdn. No more need to
include those js in the source release.
Do that cause any issues ?
2012/7/7 Olivier Lamy :
> So.
> To ease this release I will simply remove the example part which
> contains those files.
> The goals was simply to help
So.
To ease this release I will simply remove the example part which
contains those files.
The goals was simply to help users to see how that works with a real
sample included in the source release...
Now they will have to see the code in the scm.
BTW did you see any troubles before I
On 7 July 2012 07:48, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2012/7/7 sebb :
>> On 6 July 2012 22:35, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>> 2012/7/6 sebb :
On 5 July 2012 20:45, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd like we release Apache DirectMemory 0.1-incubating (first release
> on Apache land !)
>
> We
2012/7/7 sebb :
> On 6 July 2012 22:35, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>> 2012/7/6 sebb :
>>> On 5 July 2012 20:45, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hi,
I'd like we release Apache DirectMemory 0.1-incubating (first release
on Apache land !)
We solved 54 issues (see http://s.apache.org/DIRECTMEMO
On 6 July 2012 22:35, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2012/7/6 sebb :
>> On 5 July 2012 20:45, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I'd like we release Apache DirectMemory 0.1-incubating (first release
>>> on Apache land !)
>>>
>>> We solved 54 issues (see http://s.apache.org/DIRECTMEMORY-0.1-incubating)
>>> Se
2012/7/6 sebb :
> On 5 July 2012 20:45, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I'd like we release Apache DirectMemory 0.1-incubating (first release
>> on Apache land !)
>>
>> We solved 54 issues (see http://s.apache.org/DIRECTMEMORY-0.1-incubating)
>> See release notes:
>> http://incubator.apache.org/dire
On 5 July 2012 20:45, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd like we release Apache DirectMemory 0.1-incubating (first release
> on Apache land !)
>
> We solved 54 issues (see http://s.apache.org/DIRECTMEMORY-0.1-incubating)
> See release notes:
> http://incubator.apache.org/directmemory/releases/release
Hi,
I'd like we release Apache DirectMemory 0.1-incubating (first release
on Apache land !)
We solved 54 issues (see http://s.apache.org/DIRECTMEMORY-0.1-incubating)
See release notes:
http://incubator.apache.org/directmemory/releases/release-notes-0.1-incubating.html
As we essentially produce Ma
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> BTW can we remove the draft status from
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html if those
> rules applied for releases.
That document is a wreck. It is in no way ready to for the "draft" status
to be removed. It's a pastic
2012/7/2 sebb :
> On 2 July 2012 14:42, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>> 2012/7/2 sebb :
>>> On 2 July 2012 09:11, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hi,
We'd like to release Apache DirectMemory 0.1-incubating (first release
on Apache land !)
The vote has already passed on direct memory dev@.
>>>
On 2 July 2012 14:42, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2012/7/2 sebb :
>> On 2 July 2012 09:11, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> We'd like to release Apache DirectMemory 0.1-incubating (first release
>>> on Apache land !)
>>>
>>> The vote has already passed on direct memory dev@.
>>> Vote thread: http://mark
2012/7/2 sebb :
> On 2 July 2012 09:11, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>> Hi,
>> We'd like to release Apache DirectMemory 0.1-incubating (first release
>> on Apache land !)
>>
>> The vote has already passed on direct memory dev@.
>> Vote thread: http://markmail.org/message/a3yczwysqognrtg4
>> Vote result:
>>
On 2 July 2012 09:11, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hi,
> We'd like to release Apache DirectMemory 0.1-incubating (first release
> on Apache land !)
>
> The vote has already passed on direct memory dev@.
> Vote thread: http://markmail.org/message/a3yczwysqognrtg4
> Vote result:
> +1 (binding): Ant Elder,
Hi,
We'd like to release Apache DirectMemory 0.1-incubating (first release
on Apache land !)
The vote has already passed on direct memory dev@.
Vote thread: http://markmail.org/message/a3yczwysqognrtg4
Vote result:
+1 (binding): Ant Elder, Tim Williams, Tommaso Teofili, Olivier Lamy
+1 (non bindin
17 matches
Mail list logo
