[RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-28 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > Quickstep proposal was made available for discussion last week > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/QuickstepProposal > and the feedback so far seems to be positive. > > Please vote to accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator.

Re: [VOTE] Accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-28 Thread Julian Hyde
+1 (binding) > On Mar 28, 2016, at 11:50 AM, Rahul Iyer wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > ​ > > >>> Please vote to accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator. >>> The vote will be open until Mon 3/28 noon PST. >>> >>> [ ] +1 Accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator >>> [ ] +0 Abstain >>> [ ]

Re: [VOTE] Accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-28 Thread Rahul Iyer
+1 (non-binding) ​ > > Please vote to accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator. > > The vote will be open until Mon 3/28 noon PST. > > > > [ ] +1 Accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator > > [ ] +0 Abstain > > [ ] -1 Don't accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator because ... > > ​ > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-28 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > Quickstep proposal was made available for discussion last week > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/QuickstepProposal > and the feedback so far seems to be positive. > > Please vote to accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator.

Re: [VOTE] Accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-28 Thread Konstantin Boudnik
+1 [binding] On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 02:01PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > Quickstep proposal was made available for discussion last week > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/QuickstepProposal > and the feedback so far seems to be positive. > > Please vote to accept Quickstep into the Ap

Re: [VOTE] Accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-26 Thread Frank McQuillan
+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 8:54 PM, Gangumalla, Uma wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Regards, > Uma > > On 3/22/16, 2:01 PM, "shaposh...@gmail.com on behalf of Roman Shaposhnik" > wrote: > > >Hi! > > > >Quickstep proposal was made available for discussion last week > >https://wik

Re: [VOTE] Accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-25 Thread Gangumalla, Uma
+1 (non-binding) Regards, Uma On 3/22/16, 2:01 PM, "shaposh...@gmail.com on behalf of Roman Shaposhnik" wrote: >Hi! > >Quickstep proposal was made available for discussion last week >https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/QuickstepProposal >and the feedback so far seems to be positive. > >Please

Re: [VOTE] Accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-25 Thread Alexander Bezzubov
+1 (non-binding) -- Alex On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 8:16 AM, Julian Hyde wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > On Mar 22, 2016, at 3:00 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) -C > > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Roman Shaposhnik > wrote: > >> Hi! > >> > >> Quickstep proposal was made availab

Re: [VOTE] Accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-22 Thread Julian Hyde
+1 (binding) > On Mar 22, 2016, at 3:00 PM, Chris Douglas wrote: > > +1 (binding) -C > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Quickstep proposal was made available for discussion last week >>https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/QuickstepProposal >> and the fe

Re: [VOTE] Accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-22 Thread Chris Douglas
+1 (binding) -C On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > Quickstep proposal was made available for discussion last week > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/QuickstepProposal > and the feedback so far seems to be positive. > > Please vote to accept Quickstep into the

Re: [VOTE] Accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-22 Thread Tom Barber
+1 binding On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 9:01 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > Quickstep proposal was made available for discussion last week > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/QuickstepProposal > and the feedback so far seems to be positive. > > Please vote to accept Quickstep into the Apac

Re: [VOTE] Accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-22 Thread Chris Nauroth
+1 (binding) --Chris Nauroth On 3/22/16, 2:01 PM, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote: >Hi! > >Quickstep proposal was made available for discussion last week >https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/QuickstepProposal >and the feedback so far seems to be positive. > >Please vote to accept Quickstep into t

Re: [VOTE] Accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-22 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) Regards JB On 03/22/2016 10:01 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: Hi! Quickstep proposal was made available for discussion last week https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/QuickstepProposal and the feedback so far seems to be positive. Please vote to accept Quickstep into the Apache Inc

[VOTE] Accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator

2016-03-22 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
Hi! Quickstep proposal was made available for discussion last week https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/QuickstepProposal and the feedback so far seems to be positive. Please vote to accept Quickstep into the Apache Incubator. The vote will be open until Mon 3/28 noon PST. [ ] +1 Accept Quickst