The BeanShell proposal started a vote thread to join the Incubator and
received some -1 votes. No discussion or changes where made after that and
the vote was never closed. Closing vote thread to clean up the Incubator
vote status page
-Jake
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-gene
24, 2013 12:23 AM
> To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
> Subject: [VOTE] Accept Apache BeanShell in the Incubator
>
>> Dear ASF members,
>>
>> We would like to propose BeanShell for the incubator.
>>
>> The proposal draft is available at:
>> h
: Simone Tripodi
Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
Date: Friday, May 24, 2013 12:23 AM
To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
Subject: [VOTE] Accept Apache BeanShell in the Incubator
>Dear ASF members,
>
>We would like to propose BeanShell for the incubator.
>
On 05/27/2013 06:37 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On May 27, 2013, at 2:37 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 9:07 AM, ant elder wrote:
...Half the committers are ASF
members so they know what they're doing already, we're not going to teach
Sebb anything new about doing rel
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> ...I am FWD'ing the discussion to dev@commons to evaluate BS joins
> Commons directly in the Sandbox
Cool - as Ant said, if the group who's bringing this bunch of code to
Commons is willing to take full responsibility for bringing it in
Salut Bertrand, hi Ant,
>> ...Half the committers are ASF
>> members so they know what they're doing already, we're not going to teach
>> Sebb anything new about doing releases...
the story so far is that at the time of bringing OGNL to Apache
Commons - exactly similar situation, all ASF people +
On May 27, 2013, at 2:37 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 9:07 AM, ant elder wrote:
>> ...Half the committers are ASF
>> members so they know what they're doing already, we're not going to teach
>> Sebb anything new about doing releases...
>
> Indeed ;-)
>
>> ...All th
+1 (binding)
Ralph
On May 24, 2013, at 12:23 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Dear ASF members,
>
> We would like to propose BeanShell for the incubator.
>
> The proposal draft is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BeanShellProposal,
> follows below the proposal
>
> Open is open for
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 9:07 AM, ant elder wrote:
> ...Half the committers are ASF
> members so they know what they're doing already, we're not going to teach
> Sebb anything new about doing releases...
Indeed ;-)
> ...All thats needed is a software grant and IP clearance (which from the
> previ
+1. Binding.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 24, 2013, at 12:23 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Dear ASF members,
>
> We would like to propose BeanShell for the incubator.
>
> The proposal draft is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BeanShellProposal,
> follows below the proposal
>
>
+1 Pedro Giffuni
On May 24, 2013, at 12:23 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Dear ASF members,
>
> We would like to propose BeanShell for the incubator.
>
> The proposal draft is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BeanShellProposal,
> follows below the proposal
>
> Open is open for at
+1 in that case as well.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
> From: Bertrand Delacretaz
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Friday, 24 May 2013, 16:59
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache BeanShell in the Incubator
>
> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 3:59
On 24/05/2013 Simone Tripodi wrote:
open for at least 72h and closes approximately on May 27th at 8:20am GMT
[ ] +1 accept BeanShell in the Incubator
[ ] ±0
[ ] -1 because (provide a reason)
+1 accept BeanShell in the Incubator (non-binding)
Andrea
.
>
> thanks,
>
> Pat Niemeyer
> (BeanShell project founder)
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> -- Forwarded message --
>> From: Christian Grobmeier
>> Date: Fri, May 24, 2013 at 10:03 AM
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache BeanSh
Its good that we can help keep BeanShell going by bring it to the ASF, but
my vote here is -1.
There was some discussion on this proposal back in April and one of the
last emails there was this one saying:
"If the intention is to have Beanshell become a part of Apache Commons then
the IPMC feels
+1 (non-binding)
With regards,
Daniel.
On 05/24/2013 09:23 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Dear ASF members,
>
> We would like to propose BeanShell for the incubator.
>
> The proposal draft is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BeanShellProposal,
> follows below the proposal
>
> Ope
+1 (binding)
On Friday, May 24, 2013, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Dear ASF members,
>
> We would like to propose BeanShell for the incubator.
>
> The proposal draft is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BeanShellProposal,
> follows below the proposal
>
> Open is open for at least 72h a
+ 1 (binding)
Suresh
On May 24, 2013, at 3:23 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Dear ASF members,
>
> We would like to propose BeanShell for the incubator.
>
> The proposal draft is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BeanShellProposal,
> follows below the proposal
>
> Open is open f
On Fri, May 24, 2013, at 02:23 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Dear ASF members,
>
> We would like to propose BeanShell for the incubator.
>
> The proposal draft is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BeanShellProposal,
> follows below the proposal
>
> Open is open for at least 72h and
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 09:23:58AM +0200, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Dear ASF members,
>
> We would like to propose BeanShell for the incubator.
>
> The proposal draft is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BeanShellProposal,
> follows below the proposal
>
> Open is open for at least
+1 (binding)
Regards, Ate
On 05/24/2013 09:23 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Dear ASF members,
We would like to propose BeanShell for the incubator.
The proposal draft is available at:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BeanShellProposal,
follows below the proposal
Open is open for at least 72h an
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Patrick Niemeyer wrote:
> ...I am happy to assign the BeanShell name, domain name, etc. to ASF. These
> names are not actively used elsewhere for any purpose
Good, with this clarification, here's my +1 for incubation.
I agree that a users list is often not
-
> From: Christian Grobmeier
> Date: Fri, May 24, 2013 at 10:03 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache BeanShell in the Incubator
> To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
>
>
> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>> Hi Simo,
>&g
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On May 24, 2013, at 12:23 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Dear ASF members,
>
> We would like to propose BeanShell for the incubator.
>
> The proposal draft is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BeanShellProposal,
> follows below the proposal
>
> Open is
On 24 May 2013 08:23, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Dear ASF members,
>
> We would like to propose BeanShell for the incubator.
>
> The proposal draft is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BeanShellProposal,
> follows below the proposal
>
> Open is open for at least 72h and closes approxi
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi Simo,
>
> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Simone Tripodi
> wrote:
>> ...We would like to propose BeanShell for the incubator
>
> Sorry if I missed a previous discussion - is the name ok for us?
>
> Looking at http://www.beanshe
Hi Simo,
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> ...We would like to propose BeanShell for the incubator
Sorry if I missed a previous discussion - is the name ok for us?
Looking at http://www.beanshell.org/ and
http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=274 the name BeanShell is used
Dear ASF members,
We would like to propose BeanShell for the incubator.
The proposal draft is available at:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BeanShellProposal,
follows below the proposal
Open is open for at least 72h and closes approximately on May 27th at 8:20am GMT
[ ] +1 accept BeanShell in
28 matches
Mail list logo
