Re: [QUESTION] Rewriting history

2015-11-20 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
To me, binaries not released by the ASF should not be necessary to keep in multiple repos so this is a project PMC decision. On 11/20/2015 11:02 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: Probably a bad subject in the context of other things going on :). Apache Brooklyn is faced with the tasks of migrating it

Re: [QUESTION] Rewriting history

2015-11-20 Thread Sam Corbett
Hi, To give some context on the objects in question.. There are 14 files in Brooklyn's history larger than 1Mb. Four of these are larger than 20Mb. The largest is 57Mb(!). These files make for a significant penalty when cloning the repository. Of the fourteen large files, five were present in th

Re: [QUESTION] Rewriting history

2015-11-20 Thread Ted Dunning
On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 12:02 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > The question was asked on general@ [1] many moons ago, but received no > answer (the original thread [1] indicates the offenders). We'd like to use > this occasion to split the git repo into multiple smaller once (more > naturally tailore

[QUESTION] Rewriting history

2015-11-20 Thread Hadrian Zbarcea
Probably a bad subject in the context of other things going on :). Apache Brooklyn is faced with the tasks of migrating it's repo(s) post graduation and there are some very large *pre-incubation* artifacts in the git repo that we would like removed. The question was asked on general@ [1] many