Re: [PROPOSAL] Storm for Apache Incubator

2013-09-08 Thread Ted Dunning
The last comment on the discussion thread was 4 days ago. It seems like a vote is ripe. On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Nathan Marz wrote: > (Sorry for slow response, been traveling in Asia) > > Thanks for volunteering guys! Added you both as mentors on the proposal. > > Since there's no mor

Re: [PROPOSAL] Storm for Apache Incubator

2013-09-08 Thread Nathan Marz
(Sorry for slow response, been traveling in Asia) Thanks for volunteering guys! Added you both as mentors on the proposal. Since there's no more pending concerns, is the next step to do a vote? On Sep 5, 2013, at 5:42 AM, Benjamin Hindman wrote: > Proposal looks great Nathan, I'd like to volu

Re: [PROPOSAL] Storm for Apache Incubator

2013-09-05 Thread Benjamin Hindman
Proposal looks great Nathan, I'd like to volunteer as a mentor if you're looking for more help! On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Nathan Marz wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'd like to propose Storm to be an Apache Incubator project. After much > thought I believe this is the right next step for the p

Re: [PROPOSAL] Storm for Apache Incubator

2013-09-04 Thread Matt Franklin
+1. If you need another mentor, sign me up. On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Nathan Marz wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'd like to propose Storm to be an Apache Incubator project. After much > thought I believe this is the right next step for the project, and I look > forward to hearing everyone's

Re: [PROPOSAL] Storm for Apache Incubator

2013-09-04 Thread Joe Stein
sounds great +1 to include storm-kafka under a contrib folder of the Apache Storm project & for other modules (moving forward) based on community members showing initiative in working on and maintaing them On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Nathan Marz wrote: > I think that storm-kafka would make

Re: [PROPOSAL] Storm for Apache Incubator

2013-09-04 Thread Nathan Marz
I think that storm-kafka would make sense as a contrib module since it's widely used. I'm not sure what to do with the other storm-contrib modules. I figure the less code that's part of the initial repo the better, because there will be less contribution/legal issues to sort out. How about this

Re: [PROPOSAL] Storm for Apache Incubator

2013-09-04 Thread Joe Stein
What does this mean for storm contribs ( https://github.com/nathanmarz/storm-contrib)? (spouts & bolts) e.g The Apache Kafka spout already it is hard to know which to use and which is best for 0.7.X and 0.8.X-betaX... Is the Apache Storm project going to help corral that or is it only for Storm co

Re: [PROPOSAL] Storm for Apache Incubator

2013-09-04 Thread Nathan Marz
We definitely need a storm-user list as the existing google groups mailing list for Storm is quite active. So we'll need to transition that over. I agree on adding a storm-commits list and added it to the proposal. On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Henry Saputra wrote: > Excited about Storm comin

Re: [PROPOSAL] Storm for Apache Incubator

2013-09-04 Thread Henry Saputra
Excited about Storm coming to Apache. Small comment about the mailing list, you may want to propose having: * storm-dev * storm-commits * storm-private (with moderated subscriptions) instead for starting into incubator. However, Storm has been a well known open source project, maybe it does valid

Re: [PROPOSAL] Storm for Apache Incubator

2013-09-04 Thread Henry Saputra
I think this is just PROPOSAL thread. Some questions asked in this thread so I guess no VOTE yet. - Henry On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > Are we voting? > > Regards, > Alan > > On Sep 4, 2013, at 8:33 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > > > +1 binding > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 4,

Re: [PROPOSAL] Storm for Apache Incubator

2013-09-04 Thread Nathan Marz
That's how many people have contributed code (even just one small patch). The people on the committer list have all made significant and high quality contributions. On Sep 4, 2013, at 3:28 AM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote: > +1 (unbinding) > Looking very good. Just wondering why there are only 7 i

Re: [PROPOSAL] Storm for Apache Incubator

2013-09-04 Thread Ted Dunning
I think that having a focused set of strong committers to start is a far better policy than including a bunch of Barneycommitters. On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Nathan Marz wrote: > That's how many people have contributed code (even just one small patch).

Re: [PROPOSAL] Storm for Apache Incubator

2013-09-04 Thread Tim Williams
+1 --tim On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 4:07 AM, Nathan Marz wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'd like to propose Storm to be an Apache Incubator project. After much > thought I believe this is the right next step for the project, and I look > forward to hearing everyone's thoughts and feedback! > > Here's a l

Re: [PROPOSAL] Storm for Apache Incubator

2013-09-04 Thread Leif Hedstrom
+1 (binding) -- leif - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [PROPOSAL] Storm for Apache Incubator

2013-09-04 Thread Arvind Prabhakar
+1 (binding) Note that I fixed a minor typo in my name on the Wiki. Regards, Arvind Prabhakar On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Nathan Marz wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'd like to propose Storm to be an Apache Incubator project. After much > thought I believe this is the right next step for the p

Re: [PROPOSAL] Storm for Apache Incubator

2013-09-04 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
Are we voting? Regards, Alan On Sep 4, 2013, at 8:33 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > +1 binding > > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 7:52 AM, Suresh Srinivas wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Sent from phone >> >> On Sep 4, 2013, at 1:07 AM, Nathan Marz wrote: >> >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> I'd like to

Re: [PROPOSAL] Storm for Apache Incubator

2013-09-04 Thread Ted Dunning
+1 binding On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 7:52 AM, Suresh Srinivas wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Sent from phone > > On Sep 4, 2013, at 1:07 AM, Nathan Marz wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I'd like to propose Storm to be an Apache Incubator project. After much > > thought I believe this is the right

Re: [PROPOSAL] Storm for Apache Incubator

2013-09-04 Thread Suresh Srinivas
+1 (non-binding) Sent from phone On Sep 4, 2013, at 1:07 AM, Nathan Marz wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'd like to propose Storm to be an Apache Incubator project. After much > thought I believe this is the right next step for the project, and I look > forward to hearing everyone's thoughts and fe

Re: [PROPOSAL] Storm for Apache Incubator

2013-09-04 Thread Supun Kamburugamuva
+1 Supun.. On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 6:28 AM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote: > +1 (unbinding) > Looking very good. Just wondering why there are only 7 initial committers > when you say that the storm developer community has 46 members. > > Cheers. > Reto > > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Srinath

Re: [PROPOSAL] Storm for Apache Incubator

2013-09-04 Thread Reto Bachmann-Gmür
+1 (unbinding) Looking very good. Just wondering why there are only 7 initial committers when you say that the storm developer community has 46 members. Cheers. Reto On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Srinath Perera wrote: > +1, look good. > > --Srinath > > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Nath

Re: [PROPOSAL] Storm for Apache Incubator

2013-09-04 Thread Sharad Agarwal
+1 (non-binding)

Re: [PROPOSAL] Storm for Apache Incubator

2013-09-04 Thread Jordan Zimmerman
+1 Jordan Zimmerman On Sep 4, 2013, at 1:07 AM, Nathan Marz wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'd like to propose Storm to be an Apache Incubator project. After much > thought I believe this is the right next step for the project, and I look > forward to hearing everyone's thought

Re: [PROPOSAL] Storm for Apache Incubator

2013-09-04 Thread Srinath Perera
+1, look good. --Srinath On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Nathan Marz wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'd like to propose Storm to be an Apache Incubator project. After much > thought I believe this is the right next step for the project, and I look > forward to hearing everyone's thoughts and feedba

Re: [PROPOSAL] Storm for Apache Incubator

2013-09-04 Thread sebgoa
+1 Great proposal and it would be a nice addition to the "big data" projects in the ASF. On Sep 4, 2013, at 11:19 AM, Tomaz Muraus wrote: > Agreed. I think Storm would be a great addition to ASF. > > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) > wrote: > >> +1 This would be grea

Re: [PROPOSAL] Storm for Apache Incubator

2013-09-04 Thread Tomaz Muraus
Agreed. I think Storm would be a great addition to ASF. On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) wrote: > +1 This would be great. > > On 9/4/13 1:07 AM, "Nathan Marz" wrote: > > >Hi everyone, > > > >I'd like to propose Storm to be an Apache Incubator project. After much > >thought

Re: [PROPOSAL] Storm for Apache Incubator

2013-09-04 Thread Debo Dutta (dedutta)
+1 This would be great. On 9/4/13 1:07 AM, "Nathan Marz" wrote: >Hi everyone, > >I'd like to propose Storm to be an Apache Incubator project. After much >thought I believe this is the right next step for the project, and I look >forward to hearing everyone's thoughts and feedback! > >Here's a li

[PROPOSAL] Storm for Apache Incubator

2013-09-04 Thread Nathan Marz
Hi everyone, I'd like to propose Storm to be an Apache Incubator project. After much thought I believe this is the right next step for the project, and I look forward to hearing everyone's thoughts and feedback! Here's a link to the proposal: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/StormProposal The p