Hello Paul,
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 06:18:35 +
Paul Fremantle wrote:
> Marc
>
> Sounds like a really interesting proposal. I also slightly share Dan's
> concerns about community, but while this is never going to have a
> diversity of 10, it might easily have a diversity of 3 which is
> enough.
Hello Dan,
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 23:24:48 -0500
Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> Marc,
>
> I honestly think this would be a VERY hard project to incubate and
> I'd like to suggest an alternative course of action..
>
> Basically, this is an extremely targetted technology, and not exactly
> a "fun" one
Marc
Sounds like a really interesting proposal. I also slightly share Dan's
concerns about community, but while this is never going to have a
diversity of 10, it might easily have a diversity of 3 which is
enough. I do agree with Dan that we need to involve the WSS4J
community into this discussion
Marc,
I honestly think this would be a VERY hard project to incubate and I'd like to
suggest an alternative course of action..
Basically, this is an extremely targetted technology, and not exactly a "fun"
one at that. I'm willing to bet I can count the number of people in the
world that
Hello All
I would like to formally propose that the SWSSF Project will be
considered for inclusion in the ASF Incubator as a new podling. The
name of the project is not fixed and I am open for proposals. An idea
for a name was "RoadRunner" but this smells like trouble.
Please read further for a d
