Cool, thanks! Looking forward for the VOTE thread :)
On Saturday, May 17, 2014, Chris Aniszczyk wrote:
> Your request about the user list seems fine, no need to have multiple lists
> atm IMHO.
>
> The proposal has been updated accordingly, thanks!
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ParquetPropo
Your request about the user list seems fine, no need to have multiple lists
atm IMHO.
The proposal has been updated accordingly, thanks!
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ParquetProposal?action=recall&rev=21
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Henry Saputra wrote:
> Chris, could you please addres
Chris, could you please address my concern about user@ list
- Henry
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Chris Aniszczyk wrote:
> SGTM Roman, thanks for volunteering!
>
> I'll start the vote on Sunday barring any issues.
>
>
> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>>
Thanks Dmitriy
Thats what I thought we would do but just wanted to make sure, proposal
updated to reflect the main imports that we will need
-Jake
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Dmitriy Ryaboy wrote:
> Roman -- you've been added, thanks for volunteering :)
>
> One Jake's repo question, I thi
Roman -- you've been added, thanks for volunteering :)
One Jake's repo question, I think it would be somewhat problematic, and
we'd prefer multiple git repos. Format and the java code are currently
versioned separately and have different builds (format is much lighter).
Plus, if we add, for exampl
SGTM Roman, thanks for volunteering!
I'll start the vote on Sunday barring any issues.
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> proposal looks good to me and I am very much looking
> for a voting thread.
>
> One small request, since I plan to spend a fair amount
> of
Hi!
proposal looks good to me and I am very much looking
for a voting thread.
One small request, since I plan to spend a fair amount
of time on Parquet anyway, would you guys be ok
with adding me as an extra mentor so I can help
with that aspect of the project as well?
Thanks,
Roman.
P.S. Plus
Like most new projects coming to incubator I always check on how busy
is the existing user@ list in Parquet right now?
If most questions or concerns are related to development, I would
suggest to remove request for user@ list for now to get the project
focus on moving to ASF development infrastruc
Changed some of the mailing lists requested to match the format currently
in use. One question I had was do we plan to merge parquet-mr and
parquet-format into one parquet repo as listed in the proposal or keep them
separated? Other than that looks good
-Jake
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Chr
Proposal looks good to me! Eagerly awaiting the vote.
-Todd
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Chris Aniszczyk wrote:
> We would like to propose Parquet as an Apache Incubator project.
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ParquetProposal
>
> Feel free to comment, we'll go for a vote in a week or
Sounds good to me.
I'm not into Hadoop, but sounds like it's useful.
The code seems to be ALv2 since quite some time thus I don't see much legal
issues in this respect.
LieGrue,
strub
On Tuesday, 13 May 2014, 6:09, Chris Aniszczyk wrote:
We would like to propose Parquet as an Apache Incubato
We would like to propose Parquet as an Apache Incubator project.
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ParquetProposal
Feel free to comment, we'll go for a vote in a week or two or whenever
consensus has been reached on the proposal.
I've posted posted the text of the proposal below:
== Abstract ==
12 matches
Mail list logo
