On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> My comment was more about this:
>
> "This seems like an excellent opportunity for people who are less
> experienced or perhaps not members of the IPMC yet to try their hand at
> mentoring."
I should have used another word: "... try their han
Hi,
My comment was more about this:
"This seems like an excellent opportunity for people who are less
experienced or perhaps not members of the IPMC yet to try their hand at
mentoring."
that you putting your self forward, but thanks for clearing it up.
Thanks,
Justin
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 8:
Hi Justin,
both - Scott and me - are ASF members and IPMC members.
The policy has not changed.
Cheers,
Christian
On 4 Dec 2013, at 22:10, Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
I thought you needed to be a IPMC member in order to be a mentor. [1]
states that "Mentors MUST be on the IPMC." If you're an AS
Hi,
I thought you needed to be a IPMC member in order to be a mentor. [1]
states that "Mentors MUST be on the IPMC." If you're an ASF member you can
ask to be on the IPMC [2]. So by "people" above I assume you mean ASF/IPMC
members or has this changed?
Thanks,
Justin
1.http://incubator.apache.or
Thanks a lot for your comments Marvin. They were very encouraging.
Scott Deboy just pinged me that he joins the ranks of log4cxx mentors.
He is also is involved in Apache Logging.
I am going to call a vote!
On 4 Dec 2013, at 20:12, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 12:30 AM, Chri
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 12:30 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> Since there are no other interested mentors: would you folks object if we
> start anyway?
Sounds like a throwback to the early days of the Incubator when I hear there
was only one Mentor per podling. :) +1, go ahead!
The podling will
Hi,
I would appreciate comments if you believe my proceeding is OK.
Since there are no other interested mentors: would you folks object if
we start anyway?
I feel a bit alone with my proposal. Given the size of the IPMC thats a
bit sad.
Thanks,
Christian
On 28 Nov 2013, at 10:50, Christia
These are all people who are not known to Logging. And so far I don't
see if anybody else at Logging has the time or knowledge to oversee
incoming patches. I would like to treat it as a new incubation: new
people, new community, new things to learn. I would like to give them
write access direct
I'm not sure why the Incubator needs to be involved at all here.
On 30 November 2013 19:30, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> zero feedback? :-)
>
>
> On 28 Nov 2013, at 10:50, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>
>> Dear Incubator people,
>>
>> I just added a new proposal for the incubation of log4cxx:
>> ht
zero feedback? :-)
On 28 Nov 2013, at 10:50, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Dear Incubator people,
I just added a new proposal for the incubation of log4cxx:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Log4cxxProposal
This project was inactive for a good while at logging.apache.org. When
we discussed the
Dear Incubator people,
I just added a new proposal for the incubation of log4cxx:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Log4cxxProposal
This project was inactive for a good while at logging.apache.org. When
we discussed the attic,
a lot of people showed their interest and willingness to work on it
11 matches
Mail list logo
