Henning Schmiedehausen schrieb:
> Huh, am I late?
Me too ;-)
I thought this was just the disussion and the vote would start afterwards.
Anyway, as a long time JSPWiki user
+1
--
Christian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTE
Huh, am I late?
+1 (mentoring JSPWiki... ;-) )
Best regards
Henning
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 22:41 -0400, Dave wrote:
> The proposal was posted Aug. 29, we're up to 4 or 5 binding +1 votes
> now and no -1 vote have been cast.
>
> Binding:
> +1 Craig Russell
> +1 Noel Berg
I'd count "Snoop" Dave Johnson as a binding vote, being Incubator PMC.
Time's up. Go for't.
Craig
On Sep 11, 2007, at 7:41 PM, Dave wrote:
The proposal was posted Aug. 29, we're up to 4 or 5 binding +1 votes
now and no -1 vote have been cast.
Binding:
+1 Craig Russell
+1 Noel Bergman
+1 Nico
The proposal was posted Aug. 29, we're up to 4 or 5 binding +1 votes
now and no -1 vote have been cast.
Binding:
+1 Craig Russell
+1 Noel Bergman
+1 Nicolas Hedman
+1 Ted Husted
Other:
+1 Dave Johnson (retroactively binding?)
+1 Alexey Petrenko
+1 Martijn Dashorst
Are we ready to incubate?
- Da
+1 for incubation.
It's clear to me from the discussion here that the prospective
project is aware of most of the IP, licensing, and third party issues
that we deal with at Apache, and I welcome the opportunity to have
them continue work in Apache.
I'll even volunteer to help mentor if th
+1 for the overall proposal (binding)
On 8/29/07, Janne Jalkanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> I am Janne Jalkanen, the lead developer of the open source wiki
> engine called JSPWiki, and I have a proposal for your enjoyment.
> This proposal is available in the web at http://www.jspw
On 9/8/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave Johnson wrote:
>
> > Yes! I'd like to sign up for the Incubator project and Infra to help out.
>
> OK, I want to be clear, and then I'll get the process done. You are asking
> to join the Incubator PMC, and volunteering as a Mentor for J
Dave Johnson wrote:
> Yes! I'd like to sign up for the Incubator project and Infra to help out.
OK, I want to be clear, and then I'll get the process done. You are asking
to join the Incubator PMC, and volunteering as a Mentor for JSPWiki?
The infrastructure side of your offer is best addressed
> We have all but one tracked down and all have already agreed.
> The question is whether they need to sign CLAs or whether it
> is just enough that they verbally in an email agree to the
> license change.
If they want to continue development, they must sign a CLA. If they just
want to grant lice
In general, if there are any questions about IP and/or licensing, you can
check with the PMC, and we can go to the Legal Committee.
> Also, things like JavaMail libraries are highly useful for our user
> experience (e.g. sending email in case the user forgets his
> password). If there is an Apach
Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
> these concerns are very valid and good and Janne has demonstrated that
> he is aware of this.
> However, most of the vetting required is actually *part* of the
> incubation process and happens after acceptance into the incubator.
> So can we just postpone that disc
t; ApacheJSPWikiProposal, should you wish to help us to make it better.
>
> /Janne
>
> -
>
> Abstract
>
> Apache JSPWiki will be a modular and user-extensible wiki-engine,
> based on the open source JSPWiki software.
>
> Proposal
>
> JSPWiki is a wiki engin
On 9/8/07, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1. The fact that Janne pointed to a web page listing all the potential
> hazards, is a VERY GOOD sign that he has at least as good grip of the
> situation as the average Java project at Apache. And definitely good enough
> for me to start incu
On Saturday 08 September 2007 17:41, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
> these concerns are very valid and good and Janne has demonstrated that
> he is aware of this.
>
> However, most of the vetting required is actually *part* of the
> incubation process and happens after acceptance into the incubator
eb at http://www.jspwiki.org/wiki/
> > ApacheJSPWikiProposal, should you wish to help us to make it better.
> >
> > /Janne
> >
> > -
> >
> > Abstract
> >
> > Apache JSPWiki will be a modular and user-extensible wiki-engine,
> > based on the ope
Hi,
On 9/6/07, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As a concrete example, look at Axis. At some point in its lifetime, WSDL4J
> was added to the distribution, and that's licensed under the CPL. Someone
> coming in and looking at Axis might reasonably assume that it's licensed
> under the Ap
On Thursday, September 6, 2007, 6:18:42 PM, Janne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6 Sep 2007, at 17:20, Gwyn Evans wrote:
>> While agreeing that it's something that needs looking at closely, I'm
>> not I'm not sure it's downbeat as I think you're suggesting. The
>> 3rd-party licencing policy at h
On 9/6/07, Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 9/6/07, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 9/6/07, Gwyn Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > While agreeing that it's something that needs looking at closely, I'm
> > > not I'm not sure it's downbeat as I think you're
Is there a roadmap for when JSPWiki will have all of the features and
functionality of both Confluence and MoinMoin, including the
Confluence
macros we use, and the migration tools so that we can move all the
existing
data from these existing wikis to JSPWiki? Without that, I don't
see us
re
On 6 Sep 2007, at 17:20, Gwyn Evans wrote:
While agreeing that it's something that needs looking at closely, I'm
not I'm not sure it's downbeat as I think you're suggesting. The
3rd-party licencing policy at http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
redirects to the draft at http://people.apache.
> > >>
> > >> I am Janne Jalkanen, the lead developer of the open source wiki
> > >> engine called JSPWiki, and I have a proposal for your enjoyment.
> > >> This proposal is available in the web at http://www.jspwiki.org/wiki/
> > >> ApacheJSPW
On 9/6/07, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/6/07, Gwyn Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > While agreeing that it's something that needs looking at closely, I'm
> > not I'm not sure it's downbeat as I think you're suggesting. The
> > 3rd-party licencing policy at http://www.apac
nne Jalkanen, the lead developer of the open source wiki
> >> engine called JSPWiki, and I have a proposal for your enjoyment.
> >> This proposal is available in the web at http://www.jspwiki.org/wiki/
> >> ApacheJSPWikiProposal, should you wish to help us to make it better.
> >&
Well, let me put it this way: it would be kinda dumb to run our
public wiki site on another wiki engine. ;-)
Dumb? So we must already be dumb, then, to be running other things
like JVMs
that don't come from the ASF, rather than our own.
Nonono, what I meant was that it would be odd to have
>> This proposal is available in the web at http://www.jspwiki.org/wiki/
>> ApacheJSPWikiProposal, should you wish to help us to make it better.
>>
>> /Janne
>>
>> -
>>
>> Abstract
>>
>> Apache JSPWiki will be a modular and user-e
joyment.
> This proposal is available in the web at http://www.jspwiki.org/wiki/
> ApacheJSPWikiProposal, should you wish to help us to make it better.
>
> /Janne
>
> -
>
> Abstract
>
> Apache JSPWiki will be a modular and user-extensible wiki-engine,
> based on the op
On 9/6/07, Janne Jalkanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > What do you mean? Apache does not have needed lower level projects to
> > run JSPWiki?
> > How about Tomcat+Harmony?
>
> Well, let me put it this way: it would be kinda dumb to run our
> public wiki site on another wiki engine. ;-)
Dumb?
On Thursday 06 September 2007 17:56, Janne Jalkanen wrote:
> We are tracking the progress here:
>
> http://www.jspwiki.org/wiki/ApacheRelicensing
I think this is excellent and shows that you are on top of things.
+1 to bring JSPWiki to incubation at ASF.
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Deve
On Sep 6, 2007, at 11:52 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On 9/6/07, Janne Jalkanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...So, any advice on this matter?...
In my (totally non-lawyer) opinion, the cleanest way to change the
JSPWiki code to the Apache License might be for the project to release
an Apac
Yep, I got your point.
I've personally thought about possibility for users to run JSPWiki on
full Apache stack.
This could be nice out-of-the-box bundle: JSPWiki+Tomcat+Harmony
SY, Alexey
2007/9/6, Janne Jalkanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > What do you mean? Apache does not have needed lower level
In my (totally non-lawyer) opinion, the cleanest way to change the
JSPWiki code to the Apache License might be for the project to release
an Apache License version of their code, before coming to the
Incubator, using their existing release channels.
This would mean that the existing community has
What do you mean? Apache does not have needed lower level projects to
run JSPWiki?
How about Tomcat+Harmony?
Well, let me put it this way: it would be kinda dumb to run our
public wiki site on another wiki engine. ;-)
We also have separate documentation and sandbox wikis.
http://www.jspwiki
2007/9/4, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Big +1 on JSPWiki. I've been a fan for years of the software and the
> community that drives it forward. There may be some issues with
> getting the JSPWiki web application up and running on Apache
> infrastructure, which will be necessary for this effort
What
On 9/6/07, Janne Jalkanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...So, any advice on this matter?...
In my (totally non-lawyer) opinion, the cleanest way to change the
JSPWiki code to the Apache License might be for the project to release
an Apache License version of their code, before coming to the
Incub
IANAL, but I am pretty sure you are right. However, I think there
is an issue
on "how simple is simple?". It seems common to talk about 10 lines
of code
are not infringements, but then noone give any hint of an upper
limit. I
think it would be good if it could be documented somehow, to get a
On Thursday 06 September 2007 00:45, Janne Jalkanen wrote:
> simple patches do not cross the
> boundary of an original work, and therefore cannot be claimed to be
> copyrighted.
IANAL, but I am pretty sure you are right. However, I think there is an issue
on "how simple is simple?". It seems
I believe Janne has already looked into this and has a good list of
all former contributors. Janne, can you comment on the difficulty of
this challenge?
Already ahead of you. We have all but one tracked down and all have
already agreed. The question is whether they need to sign CLAs or
whe
On 9/5/07, Bill Stoddard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > JSPWiki is a wiki engine available under the Lesser General Public
> > License.
>
> > The initial goals of the project is to release JSPWiki 2.8 under the
> > Apache license:
> Successfully executing the license change could prove to be a
JSPWiki is a wiki engine available under the Lesser General Public
License.
The initial goals of the project is to release JSPWiki 2.8 under the
Apache license:
Successfully executing the license change could prove to be a
challenge. All past contributors to the project will need to agree t
On 9/5/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave Johnson wrote:
>
> > Big +1 on JSPWiki.
>
> > There may be some issues with getting [JSPWiki] up and running on Apache
> > infrastructure, which will be necessary for this effort, but I think
> > we can overcome those.
>
> Volunteering?
Dave Johnson wrote:
> Big +1 on JSPWiki.
> There may be some issues with getting [JSPWiki] up and running on Apache
> infrastructure, which will be necessary for this effort, but I think
> we can overcome those.
Volunteering? ;-)
--- Noel
-
Big +1 on JSPWiki. I've been a fan for years of the software and the
community that drives it forward. There may be some issues with
getting the JSPWiki web application up and running on Apache
infrastructure, which will be necessary for this effort, but I think
we can overcome those.
- Dave
On
This is interesting. Have you seen, that we are currently voting on
the
Jackrabbit list to enter Sling into the incubator. You may find more
information at [1].
Yes, actually I did. I think it is something we can consider
later. JSPWiki needs to do quite a lot of things internally than
Hi,
On 8/30/07, Janne Jalkanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am Janne Jalkanen, the lead developer of the open source wiki
> engine called JSPWiki, and I have a proposal for your enjoyment.
Nice!
> In the future, we expect to integrate somewhat with Jackrabbit.
Having worked on wiki stuff befo
Hi Janne,
Am Donnerstag, den 30.08.2007, 00:02 +0300 schrieb Janne Jalkanen:
> Abstract
>
> Apache JSPWiki will be a modular and user-extensible wiki-engine,
> based on the open source JSPWiki software.
> ...
> * Clean up our metadata and backend support by adding JSR-170
> repository s
-
Abstract
Apache JSPWiki will be a modular and user-extensible wiki-engine,
based on the open source JSPWiki software.
Proposal
JSPWiki is a wiki engine available under the Lesser General Public
License. It has a very modular construction, and integrates
relatively nicely with a
46 matches
Mail list logo
