On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:28:15AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
>> The Brooklyn project [1] community is interested in moving to the ASF. They
>> have worked within their community to create a proposal [2] for the
>> Incubator, and have manag
Good to see Brooklyn here. Look forward to seeing the project progress!
El 25/04/2014 08:39, "Duncan Johnston Watt" <
duncan.johnstonw...@cloudsoftcorp.com> escribió:
> Joe
>
> Thanks. Much appreciated.
>
> Please can you add yourself to the wiki proposal before Chip closes this
> thread and moves
Related-Topic: If an additional Mentor would be beneficial,
I volunteer.
On Apr 25, 2014, at 7:05 AM, Duncan Johnston Watt
wrote:
> +1 to deprecating brooklyn-users and focusing on -dev list.
>
>
> On 25 April 2014 11:03, Alex Heneveld wrote:
>
>>
>> Henry,
>>
>> Gotcha. So with that in m
+1 to deprecating brooklyn-users and focusing on -dev list.
On 25 April 2014 11:03, Alex Heneveld wrote:
>
> Henry,
>
> Gotcha. So with that in mind, our users list is not so active that it
> couldn't be merged with the dev list. And we'd like to get existing users
> more deeply involved!
>
>
Henry,
Gotcha. So with that in mind, our users list is not so active that it
couldn't be merged with the dev list. And we'd like to get existing
users more deeply involved!
So +1 to Henry's suggestion to have a dev@ list but *not* a users@ list
initially as we seek to enter the Apache inc
Joe
Thanks. Much appreciated.
Please can you add yourself to the wiki proposal before Chip closes this
thread and moves forward with formal VOTE on our behalf.
Best
Duncan
On 25 April 2014 05:27, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 04/23/2014 09:28
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/23/2014 09:28 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> We would also like to solicit contributions from additional IPMC
> members willing to mentor the potential podling. Anyone
> interested?
I'd be interested in signing on as a mentor.
Best,
jzb
- --
Joe
Hi Alex,
Looking forward for Brooklyn as part of ASF incubator, awesome project.
Most existing projects that come to Apache incubator already had user
and dev lists, but most of the times the IPMCs encourage to have
initially dev@ list to focus on integration with ASF and also to
centralized disc
Hi Henry,
Thanks for the feedback. We currently have both a dev and a user list,
as Chip notes, and they are used by different people. That's why we
thought we should move both across to apache as part of this proposal.
Does that make sense in this situation?
Best
Alex
On 24/04/2014 22:0
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 12:59:15PM -0700, Henry Saputra wrote:
> Hi Chip,
>
> Like most initial incubator projects, I think you just need dev and
> private lists for start and maybe add user list later?
>
> - Henry
I'll let the Brooklyn community speak up on that topic, since it's their
project.
t ==
>
> Brooklyn is a framework for modeling, monitoring, and managing
> applications through autonomic blueprints.
>
> == Proposal ==
>
> Brooklyn is about deploying and managing applications: composing a full
> stack for an application; deploying to cloud and non-
Great! And Chip yes please, add yourself as a mentor.
Best
Alex
On 24 Apr 2014 19:15, "Chip Childers" wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:28:15AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
> > The Brooklyn project [1] community is interested in moving to the ASF.
> They
> > have worked within their community
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:28:15AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
> The Brooklyn project [1] community is interested in moving to the ASF. They
> have worked within their community to create a proposal [2] for the
> Incubator, and have managed to get agreement from 2 IPMC members to
> mentor them if
://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BrooklynProposal
Proposal follows:
= Apache Brooklyn =
== Abstract ==
Brooklyn is a framework for modeling, monitoring, and managing
applications through autonomic blueprints.
== Proposal ==
Brooklyn is about deploying and managing applications: composing a full
stack
Andrei
This is much appreciated. I had an action to ping you as I saw you were
active on the list supporting Twill amongst other things. I'm glad you've
beaten me to it.
Please add yourself.
Best
Duncan
On 24 April 2014 01:10, Andrei Savu wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Chip Chi
oring, and managing
applications through autonomic blueprints.
== Proposal ==
Brooklyn is about deploying and managing applications: composing a full
stack for an application; deploying to cloud and non-cloud targets;
using monitoring tools to collect key health/performance metrics;
responding to
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> This is the discussion thread for this proposal. We would also like to
> solicit contributions from additional IPMC members willing to mentor the
> potential podling. Anyone interested?
>
It's great to see Brooklyn joining the Apache Incub
ne interested?
>
> -chip
>
> [1] http://brooklyncentral.github.io/
> [2] https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BrooklynProposal
>
> Proposal follows:
>
> = Apache Brooklyn =
>
> == Abstract ==
>
> Brooklyn is a framework for modeling, monitoring, and managi
g. Anyone interested?
-chip
[1] http://brooklyncentral.github.io/
[2] https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BrooklynProposal
Proposal follows:
= Apache Brooklyn =
== Abstract ==
Brooklyn is a framework for modeling, monitoring, and managing
applications through autonomic blueprints.
== Proposal ==
, and managing
applications through autonomic blueprints.
== Proposal ==
Brooklyn is about deploying and managing applications: composing a full
stack for an application; deploying to cloud and non-cloud targets;
using monitoring tools to collect key health/performance metrics;
responding to situa
Marcel / David,
Please add yourselves to the mentor list on the proposal wiki page!
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Duncan Johnston Watt
wrote:
> David
>
> Thanks. As with Marcel that is much appreciated.
>
> Best
>
> Duncan
>
>
> On 23 April 2014 16:57, David Nalley wrote:
>
>> >
>> > We app
David
Thanks. As with Marcel that is much appreciated.
Best
Duncan
On 23 April 2014 16:57, David Nalley wrote:
> >
> > We appreciate that 3-5 Mentors greatly assists the incubation process,
> > so welcome more Mentors.
> >
>
> Having watched Brooklyn from afar for a while now, I am thrilled
>
> We appreciate that 3-5 Mentors greatly assists the incubation process,
> so welcome more Mentors.
>
Having watched Brooklyn from afar for a while now, I am thrilled to
see it propose for the incubator. I'd be happy to serve as a mentor if
needed.
--David
-
Marcel
Hi. That would be brilliant.
Best
Duncan
On 23 April 2014 15:57, Marcel Offermans wrote:
> Hello Chip,
>
> On 23 Apr 2014, at 16:28 , Chip Childers wrote:
>
> > This is the discussion thread for this proposal. We would also like to
> > solicit contributions from additional IPMC membe
Hello Chip,
On 23 Apr 2014, at 16:28 , Chip Childers wrote:
> This is the discussion thread for this proposal. We would also like to
> solicit contributions from additional IPMC members willing to mentor the
> potential podling. Anyone interested?
Yes, I am interested in signing up as a mento
=
== Abstract ==
Brooklyn is a framework for modeling, monitoring, and managing
applications through autonomic blueprints.
== Proposal ==
Brooklyn is about deploying and managing applications: composing a full
stack for an application; deploying to cloud and non-cloud targets;
using monitoring
26 matches
Mail list logo
