On 2/25/2011 4:25 AM, Troy Howard wrote:
> My point was:
>
> Bill made a statement, which though rather neutral and ambiguous,
> seemed to indicate that he (or perhaps a silent mass of others) did
> not think the proposal was such a good idea, due to the risks
> associated with a significant amoun
I think the concern is in a sense valid, but this particular proposal
doesn't seem to stand out for me in that regard.
On one level, Apache is about individual contributions. Having said
that, I wonder what would become of Apache if all corporate support of
committers' activities were banned.
Per
My point was:
Bill made a statement, which though rather neutral and ambiguous,
seemed to indicate that he (or perhaps a silent mass of others) did
not think the proposal was such a good idea, due to the risks
associated with a significant amount of corporate support and
involvement. At least, tha
Troy, I am not really sure what your point is. So you believe that:
> I think the 'Known Risks' section in the proposal enumerates that
> pretty clearly, so I won't repeat it.
... yet you raise an objection for somebody else who might think otherwise?
Is that because you anticipate an objection an
I think the 'Known Risks' section in the proposal enumerates that
pretty clearly, so I won't repeat it.
I don't know why anyone would take exception to it be included in the
Incubator. It seems like a good fit, as long as the stated known risks
are addressed during incubation. My statements were m
On 24/02/2011 23:11, Troy Howard wrote:
In my opinion, a reasonable compromise would be to set it as a project
goal to reduce corporate dependency on the committers list.
I'm really confused where this is coming from. The goal of incubation is
to generate sufficient diversity in contributions
In my opinion, a reasonable compromise would be to set it as a project
goal to reduce corporate dependency on the committers list.
I would take that so far as to treat it as a bug, place an issue in
JIRA to that effect, and schedule a date/version for the issue to be
resolved. This will remind eve
I'm looking forward to a vote on this proposal.
I've read the thread and I think it's good to know **up front** that
there are going to be corporate contributions, not just from one
corporation.
Craig
On Feb 21, 2011, at 3:18 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
I would like to propose the Apache Rave p
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
> On 24/02/11 09:49, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 8:49 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2/21/2011 5:18 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
The Apache Rave project proposal is a joined effort of Hippo, the MITRE
On 24/02/11 09:49, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 8:49 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
On 2/21/2011 5:18 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
The Apache Rave project proposal is a joined effort of Hippo, the MITRE
Corporation, the
Open Gateway Computing Environments project (OGCE), the S
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 8:49 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> On 2/21/2011 5:18 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
>>
>> The Apache Rave project proposal is a joined effort of Hippo, the MITRE
>> Corporation, the
>> Open Gateway Computing Environments project (OGCE), the SURFnet SURFConext
>> Portal project,
Whilst I agree it has been discussed and understood I'm still trying to
understand what the issue being raised is. A bunch of the initial committees
are already ASF Members, the proposal does not talk of the initial backers
other than in tue ways required by the proposal process and we make it c
That was discussed a few times in the past month while we were working on the
proposal.
I believe that's fairly clear to everybody. The project starts with code grants
from the organizations mentioned.
Hadrian
On Feb 23, 2011, at 2:49 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 2/21/2011 5:18 PM, Ate
On 23/02/2011 19:49, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 2/21/2011 5:18 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
The Apache Rave project proposal is a joined effort of Hippo, the MITRE
Corporation, the
Open Gateway Computing Environments project (OGCE), the SURFnet SURFConext
Portal project,
OSS Watch, and several oth
On 2/21/2011 5:18 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
>
> The Apache Rave project proposal is a joined effort of Hippo, the MITRE
> Corporation, the
> Open Gateway Computing Environments project (OGCE), the SURFnet SURFConext
> Portal project,
> OSS Watch, and several other individuals.
Keep in mind that only
The silence could mean that everyone hates the idea of this project, but
I'm gonna take it to mean that there is simply nothing to complain
about, and that everyone is giving their silent consent, and we should
soon proceed to a vote :-)
Upayavira
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 00:18 +0100, "Ate Douma" wro
I would like to propose the Apache Rave project to the Incubator PMC.
Our draft proposal is appended to the end of this email and is available at:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/RaveProposal
The Apache Rave project proposal is a joined effort of Hippo, the MITRE
Corporation, the Open Gatewa
17 matches
Mail list logo
