+1 from me also!
Mikhail Fursov gmail.com> writes:
>
> Used OpenMeetings yesterday for our local video web conference with 3
> sites online . It worked flawlessly.
>
> +1 from me!
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-un
+1 from me. I signed up as a mentor and added my name in the proposal.
There is a potential synergy with Apache POI and ODFToolkit projects.
Openmeetings has a functionality to import office documents and
display the thumbnails. Currently it is implemented via a chained
transformation first into
+1 from me!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
I've been in touch with Sebastian and Alexei and I am willing to champion the
proposal. Just added myself to the corresponding section on the Wiki. I think
we may still need to refine / update the proposal a bit before we can start the
vote. But IMO we are very close to this point. The technolog
Thanks for the input Ross,
well I am confident we will find some Champion when some of the Apache
Members have some more time. Seems like there is a lot of traffic at the
moment with the ODF incubation.
Meanwhile we of course welcome any comments how we can apply already our
processes aligned wit
2011/8/11 seba.wag...@gmail.com :
> Great,
>
> I have updated the Proposal to be more clear on the external dependencies
> and possibilities to move away from them:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenmeetingsProposal#External_Dependencies
Thanks for addressing these concerns and signposting po
okay,
well those specs from the 08.11.2011 :) Really cutting edge information:
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/webrtc.html
However there is hardly any information about some really (and already
industry standard features):
- Echo Cancellation
- Buffering and behaviour in low ban
On 12 Aug 2011, at 08:22, seba.wag...@gmail.com wrote:
> Yes,
>
> the Java Servlet Spec 3.0 also contains methods for push mechanisms. We
> could already use similar technologies for pushing data packets around.
>
> However there is zero support for *real* streaming in the JavaScript world.
> R
Yes,
the Java Servlet Spec 3.0 also contains methods for push mechanisms. We
could already use similar technologies for pushing data packets around.
However there is zero support for *real* streaming in the JavaScript world.
RTMP is not just about pushing some messages around, it is about streami
2011/8/11 seba.wag...@gmail.com :
> I have updated the Proposal to be more clear on the external dependencies
> and possibilities to move away from them:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenmeetingsProposal#External_Dependencies
>From the sidelines, WebSockets would seem like a strong contender
Great,
I have updated the Proposal to be more clear on the external dependencies
and possibilities to move away from them:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenmeetingsProposal#External_Dependencies
Sebastian
2011/8/11 Jim Jagielski
> I've signed up for Mentor, in case we go ahead...
> On Jul
I've signed up for Mentor, in case we go ahead...
On Jul 29, 2011, at 5:46 AM, dsh wrote:
> Sebastian and Alexei,
>
> your are welcome! Btw, here is my +1
>
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Alexei Fedotov
> wrote:
>> Daniel,
>> Thank you for an excellent report!
>>
>> --
>> With best regards
On 1 August 2011 11:18, seba.wag...@gmail.com wrote:
> the Serlvet Container is Red5 (which is a modified Tomcat Servlet
> Container), you cannot run OpenMeetings without it.
>
> For building the software, OpenMeetings implements some of the API
> Interfaces of the Red5-Server. So you need at leas
Hi Ross,
the Serlvet Container is Red5 (which is a modified Tomcat Servlet
Container), you cannot run OpenMeetings without it.
For building the software, OpenMeetings implements some of the API
Interfaces of the Red5-Server. So you need at least the red5.jar available
at build time in order to pr
Great to see this proposal coming back again. If I remember correctly
there was some concern about whether the application could reasonably
expect to be made to tun without (L)GPL dependencies.
It's clear that you've already done a fair amount of work to remove
these dependencies, but the main sti
+1 from me too
Mikhail Fursov gmail.com> writes:
>
> Used OpenMeetings yesterday for our local video web conference with 3
> sites online . It worked flawlessly.
>
> +1 from me!
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsub
Sebastian and Alexei,
your are welcome! Btw, here is my +1
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Alexei Fedotov
wrote:
> Daniel,
> Thank you for an excellent report!
>
> --
> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
> http://dataved.ru/
> +7 916 562 8095
>
>
>
Sebastian,
btw, I noticed that the JNLP app remains open after you closed the
browser. That's probably because the main browser app and the JNLP app
are not tightly coupled if it comes to even notivication such as a
browser close even (it's been a will since I did Java webstart apps
the last time
Daniel,
Thank you for an excellent report!
--
With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
http://dataved.ru/
+7 916 562 8095
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:20 PM, dsh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please find my feedback below:
>
> OS X Lion:
>
> * tested with:
> ** Firefox
+1 from me
Mikhail Fursov gmail.com> writes:
>
> Used OpenMeetings yesterday for our local video web conference with 3
> sites online . It worked flawlessly.
>
> +1 from me!
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr..
@Daniel
thanks for the excellent & extended testing on your host environments. That
the screensharing does not close on the clients after the publisher hit the
*stop* is definitly a bug that we did already fix in previous versions.
The check to do not start the ScreenSharing Application several t
+1 from me too!
Mikhail Fursov gmail.com> writes:
>
> Used OpenMeetings yesterday for our local video web conference with 3
> sites online . It worked flawlessly.
>
> +1 from me!
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsub
Amendment: If using the FreeBSD Linuxulator together with the Adobe
Flash Player 11b1 and OpenJDK 6, Openmeetings works on PCBSD :)
PS: Observation on Win XP SP3 with Symantec Client Firewall - The
signup/connect attempt has been catched by the firewall software.
Cheers
Daniel
On Thu, Jul 28, 20
Hi,
please find my feedback below:
OS X Lion:
* tested with:
** Firefox 5.0.1 and Adobe Flash Player 10.3
** Safari 5.1 and Adobe Flash Player 10.3
* Observations:
** Openmeetings did not work with Firefox/Safari if using a webcam/mic
cause on the adobe flash player settings dialog it was not po
Hi! I used it for 90 participants. +1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Used OpenMeetings yesterday for our local video web conference with 3
sites online . It worked flawlessly.
+1 from me!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h.
Hi Mohammed,
thanks for your feedback. About your requests:
1. You can create your own room 3 ways at the moment:
You have the personal rooms on the dashboard,
you can create events using the calendar (every event has a conference room
assigned)
or you can send private messages to otherusers and
Hi...
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Alexei Fedotov
wrote:
> Mohammad,
>
> Any impressions to share? Have you occasionally faced any bugs?
1- I didn't find a way to create my own rooms ? Maybe I missed it
some where, but I didn't find it :).
2- When I tried it with a colleague of mine and
Mohammad,
Any impressions to share? Have you occasionally faced any bugs?
--
With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
http://dataved.ru/
+7 916 562 8095
2011/7/25 Mohammad Nour El-Din :
> +1 for the proposal
>
> I tried it out. It looks very promising :)
+1
Jim, folks,
as for help, we are looking for Apache member who may become a project champion.
--
With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
http://dataved.ru/
+7 916 562 8095
2011/7/23 Jim Jagielski :
> V. cool. Big +1
>
> Let me know how I can help.
>
>
*And a special video channel where we can see the faces
of those that have to get up in the middle of the night to join the
meeting.* => :D Should be no problem if you run the restricted
roomtype. Or you record and replay it later on.
Sebastian
2011/7/25 Jeremias Maerki :
> On 21.07.2011 15:40:45
On 21.07.2011 15:40:45 seba.wag...@gmail.com wrote:
> We would like to propose Openmeetings project to join the incubator.
>
> Full Proposal:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenmeetingsProposal
>
> Quick summary:
> OpenMeetings is Web Conferencing application that fits into
> educational or b
+1 for the proposal
I tried it out. It looks very promising :).
2011/7/25 seba.wag...@gmail.com :
> Hi,
>
> thanks for your feedback!
> @Scott: I think so too. Synchrious communication could become an
> standard feature of Social Networking Platforms. Lets see if there is
> an API in Rave for int
Hi,
thanks for your feedback!
@Scott: I think so too. Synchrious communication could become an
standard feature of Social Networking Platforms. Lets see if there is
an API in Rave for integration.
Sebastian
2011/7/23 Maurizio Cucchiara :
> Good idea!!! I had the opportunity to try OM, nice tool!
Good idea!!! I had the opportunity to try OM, nice tool!
Maurizio Cucchiara
Il giorno 23/lug/2011 17.57, "Scott Wilson"
ha scritto:
> Fantastic proposal. It would be even more fantastic to link it up with
Rave and Wookie!
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> S
>
> On 23 Jul 2011, at 16:25, Jim Jagielski wro
Fantastic proposal. It would be even more fantastic to link it up with Rave and
Wookie!
+1 (non-binding)
S
On 23 Jul 2011, at 16:25, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> V. cool. Big +1
>
> Let me know how I can help.
>
> On Jul 21, 2011, at 9:40 AM, seba.wag...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> We would like to pro
V. cool. Big +1
Let me know how I can help.
On Jul 21, 2011, at 9:40 AM, seba.wag...@gmail.com wrote:
> We would like to propose Openmeetings project to join the incubator.
>
> Full Proposal:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenmeetingsProposal
>
> Quick summary:
> OpenMeetings is Web Confe
We would like to propose Openmeetings project to join the incubator.
Full Proposal:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenmeetingsProposal
Quick summary:
OpenMeetings is Web Conferencing application that fits into
educational or business sector. You can make conference sessions in
different room-t
Just as a point of interest, I just completed a test meeting using
OpenMeetings across three sites using the demo server.
I was suitably impressed by the project. It has a few annoying
limitations, but as an online meeting tool it is very good. to the
extent that I will almost certainly be install
Noel,
Regarding Theora codec, I have checked the page [1]. Currently, there
are no products which successfully use the codec for video
communication. Video-phone encodes and decodes the stream in
real-time, adopts the quality with regard to network conditions (e.g.
lost packet rate) and tries to mi
Alexei Fedotov wrote:
> I see two long-term possibilities for synergy.
> 1. BlueSky can integrate browser pannel in their client to handle a
> whiteboard. In this case the code for whiteboard can be re-used in
> both projects.
> 2. They promise to get rid from mplayer and ffmpeg dependencies. If
Niclas, thanks for an answer about LGPL!
Noel,
Thanks for a link to BlueSky! Openmeetings is used into Moodle and
Dokeos e-learning systems - communication always helps education. The
main difference with BlueSky is that BlueSky has a standalone client,
and not the browser-based one.
I see two lo
Sounds very interesting. In addition to the existing question related to
licening, can you also comment on the problem domain overlap with BlueSky?
It seems to me that there might be good synergies.
--- Noel
-
To unsub
2009/10/29 Alexei Fedotov :
> 1. Anyone can distribute GPL-licensed binary, or LGPL-licensed
> library. The virus problems begin when you try to modify the source of
> the product. This always requires proper attributions in COPYRIGHT
> file, but anyway.
Correct (to a point), see separate mail.
2009/10/29 Alexei Fedotov :
> How does LGPL place restrictions on larger works?
The main issue is section 6 in LGPL, namely we would have to ensure
that downstream users are allowed to reverse engineer the "derived
works". So what does that really mean?
LGPL defines linking to it with dynamic la
Hello Niclas,
Thanks for a link [1]! It reads:
> The LGPL is ineligible primarily due to the restrictions it places on larger
> works
Well, I believe if lawyers said that, they have enough attribution.
Though I always thought that LGPL is GPL limited to the library scope.
How does LGPL place rest
Hello Martin,
I may fail to understand Paul's question, indeed. Let me give my best
try to answer to your questions.
> Is it not true that OpenMeetings requires Red5 in order to function
properly?
True.
The Openmeetings requires Red5 to function properly.
> So that, if we cannot distribute Red5 a
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Sebastian Wagner wrote:
> For running the application we also use
> hibernate.
For Hibernate, try to convert the application to use the JPA API
instead, then you can ship with OpenJPA from Apache and allow users to
use Hibernate instead if they want.
Cheers
--
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Sebastian Wagner wrote:
> Is a LGPL Library a general Issue? For running the application we also use
> hibernate.
> Spring, Apache Batik and Apache Mina are also used, but these are all
> already Apache Licenses projects. Hibernate is LGPL. Is this a conflict?
Fo
hi,
openmeetings _can_ be distributed without red5. Red5 acts like Tomcat
(actually it is a modified Tomcat). And openmeetings is a webapp inside this
container. For easy usage and installation we distribute it as one package,
but its still clear the its red5 + openmeetings.
Is a LGPL Library a g
On 10/28/2009 08:19 AM, Alexei Fedotov wrote:
The better thing is that Adobe finally opened RTMP specification [1].
The specification license prohibits unintended use of rtmp for for
violating digital protection (this somehow relates to new GPL v.3
features) and intercepting video, othewise it is
2009/10/28 Alexei Fedotov :
> Hello Paul,
> Thanks for a good question!
>
> Openmeetings is red5 application which is very close to ordinary web
> application. AFAIU, the last change by Sebastian makes them even
> closer by implementing ".war" deployment. The code of the projects
> does not overlap
On 28 Oct 2009, at 14:18, Sebastian Wagner wrote:
hi,
OpenLaszlo is used for compiling the Client. You don't need it to
run the
Application. So it is not needed to re-destribute OpenLaszlo.
It is linked into the Application as Library, when you have compiled
the
code you can remove OpenL
Hello Ian,
Thanks for raising questions. As for OpenLaszlo, I cannot say much.
Some Apache projects use Microsoft compiler, that's legal. I believe
it is quite doable to build OpenLaszlo completely on Apache stack, but
that project has their own authors.
As for Red5, the situation is good and bec
hi,
OpenLaszlo is used for compiling the Client. You don't need it to run the
Application. So it is not needed to re-destribute OpenLaszlo.
It is linked into the Application as Library, when you have compiled the
code you can remove OpenLaszlo's Framework.
Red5 does no transcoding. That is why it
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Ian Boston wrote:
> Also, are there any problems between Red5 and Adobe in terms of patents on
> the Flash Media Server protocols. IIRC Adobe have some patents in this area
> but I have no idea if they are relevant and enforceable or would want to
> enforce them a
Openmeetings looks very interesting. I notice Red5, and see Paul
Querna asked a question. I have 2 questions for my own education more
than anything,
What's the status of OpenLazlo wrt Apache Projects? I see it has a
long list of dependencies with all sorts of licenses [1] but have no
ide
Hello Nick,
There is a "Not a member" button [1] on the first page to get a free
account. If you doesn't mind Russian field names during registration
you can try [2] as a localization example.
[1] http://www.openmeetings.de/
[2] http://www.telebridge.ru/
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 1:38 AM, Nick Kew
Hello Paul,
Thanks for a good question!
Openmeetings is red5 application which is very close to ordinary web
application. AFAIU, the last change by Sebastian makes them even
closer by implementing ".war" deployment. The code of the projects
does not overlap in any way, and projects are connected v
On 27 Oct 2009, at 11:22, Sebastian Wagner wrote:
hi,
we would like to propose Openmeetings project to join the incubator.
Full Proposal:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenmeetingsProposal
Wow, two new proposals in a day!
Would be good to get a feeling for what this is. Is www.openmeet
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 4:22 AM, Sebastian Wagner wrote:
> hi,
>
> we would like to propose Openmeetings project to join the incubator.
>
> Full Proposal:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenmeetingsProposal
>
> Quick summary:
> OpenMeetings is Web Conferencing application that fits into educat
hi,
we would like to propose Openmeetings project to join the incubator.
Full Proposal:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenmeetingsProposal
Quick summary:
OpenMeetings is Web Conferencing application that fits into educational or
business sector. You can make conference sessions in different r
62 matches
Mail list logo
