(Note: I am not a comitter, but a user)
-1
Here is why:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg03376.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg03376.html
And I am with JBoss on this, you can't just fork the code.
(http://sourceforge.net/projects/elba )
No need for complexia
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Vic Cekvenich wrote:
> (Note: I am not a comitter, but a user)
> -1
> Here is why:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg03376.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg03376.html
Links to conversation between Andrew Oliver and Jon Stevens
is lik
(Note: I am not a comitter, but a user)
-1
Here is why:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg03376.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg03376.html
And I am with JBoss on this, you can't just fork the code.
(http://sourceforge.net/projects/elba )
No need for complexia
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Vic Cekvenich" writes:
>(Note: I am not a comitter, but a user)
>I think ASF endoring SUN's EJB, makes no sense now, to late.
>
>http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=SUNW&d=c&k=c2&a=v&p=e5,m20,m100,m200,e200&t=2y&l=
>off&z=l&q=l
>vs:
>http://viva.sourceforge.net/
>They are
Geir,
+1
If voting on this is required at all. The Board deems this strategic,
and thus I believe it is in already. A vertable who's who of J2EE
computing seems to be on the ticket, Geronimo!
- Paul Hammant
Incubator PMC
Proposal for an Apache J2EE server project
=
Simply put:
- Apache is not forking the code
- Apache will make any useful community-based project as long as there
are developers that want to do it, especially if server-side, and
it's difficult to argue that there is no use of J2EE products
- This is regular, as it has been discussed by Ap
Henri Yandell wrote:
Geronimo had nothing to do with elba.
Also, nothing wrong with elba forking the code. That's open source at
work. What would be wrong would be Geronimo using elba, as elba must be
GPL'd.
Geronimo is a different product to JBoss. JBoss is 'free-software' with
all the viral/GNU
J2EE != EJB. I suggest you read some FAQs rather than flaming.
On Thursday, August 7, 2003, at 02:51 pm, Vic Cekvenich wrote:
(Note: I am not a comitter, but a user)
-1
Here is why:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg03376.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg03376
Proposal for an Apache J2EE server project
==
05 Aug 2003 : Geir Magnusson Jr., James Strachan and Richard
Monson-Haefel
Section 0 : Rationale
-
The Java 2, Enterprise Edition (J2EE) platform is employed widely by
organizations implement
