On 2/19/2016 4:25 PM, Bhupesh Chawda wrote:
Thanks for all the replies.
This definitely looks interesting, particularly how a Quarks application is
modeled as a streaming topology.
I would also like to be part of this project and contribute to it.
Thank you Bhupesh and welcome!
--
On 2/19/2016 3:49 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
You add add me if you want, I’ve a little busy right now so may no be
so active initially.
Thank you Justin for volunteering. It will be great to have a mentor
with your experience on the project.
Best
Kathey
--
Thanks for all the replies.
This definitely looks interesting, particularly how a Quarks application is
modeled as a streaming topology.
I would also like to be part of this project and contribute to it.
Thanks.
-Bhupesh
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 12:31 AM, Katherine Marsden
wrote:
> On 2/18/2016
On 2/19/2016 3:36 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
Just FYI, we don't need to wait for you and Dan to be officially part of
IPMC, vote can be started sooner (we had similar issue with couple mentors
on SystemML)
Thank you Luciano. That's good news! I will call the vote Wednesday
then, unless somethin
Hi,
>> Is anyone else willing to be a mentor? We have three volunteers, but
>> would appreciate more.
You add add me if you want, I’ve a little busy right now so may no be so active
initially.
I’m one f the mentors on several other incubating projects (including IoT
projects) and a couple of
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Katherine Marsden
wrote:
> I really appreciate the input so far on this proposal. I was wondering...
>
> Is anyone else willing to be a mentor? We have three volunteers, but
> would appreciate more.
> Does anyone have any concerns that they have not expressed?
I really appreciate the input so far on this proposal. I was wondering...
Is anyone else willing to be a mentor? We have three volunteers, but
would appreciate more.
Does anyone have any concerns that they have not expressed? If not, I
would like to call a vote Wednesday, February 24 or as s
On Thursday, February 18, 2016 10:19 PM, Bhupesh Chawda
wrote:
I am just trying to understand the need for streaming analytics engine at
the edge devices. An example use case justifying the need for such systems
would definitely help.
There are at least a couple of drivers:
1) Intelligently red
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Katherine Marsden
wrote:
> On 2/18/2016 10:19 PM, Bhupesh Chawda wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Seems to be a nice idea for offloading processing from the centralized
>> systems.
>> I am just trying to understand the need for streaming analytics engine at
>> the edge
On 2/18/2016 10:19 PM, Bhupesh Chawda wrote:
Hi All,
Seems to be a nice idea for offloading processing from the centralized
systems.
I am just trying to understand the need for streaming analytics engine at
the edge devices. An example use case justifying the need for such systems
would definite
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Henry Saputra
wrote:
> Officially it means nothing =P
>
>
Exactly, this is what worried my a little bit.
> But it is nice way to express interest and support to the proposal.
>
>
Agree, so it's ok to leave there, as long as we understand is just a way to
expres
Officially it means nothing =P
But it is nice way to express interest and support to the proposal.
- Henry
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Seetharam Venkatesh <
venkat...@innerzeal.com> wrote:
> Apache Beam (incubating) did just this and there were a lot of 'em who
> signed up as interested co
Apache Beam (incubating) did just this and there were a lot of 'em who
signed up as interested contributors. Its not clear as to what it means
though.
Thanks!
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 9:09 AM Katherine Marsden
wrote:
> On 2/18/2016 8:57 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> > On Thursday, February 18, 20
On 2/18/2016 8:57 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
On Thursday, February 18, 2016, Katherine Marsden
wrote:
I created an Additional Interested Contributors section
What is the intent of the new section ? I would say, either add possible
contributors as initial committers or don't add at all as it
Hi All,
Seems to be a nice idea for offloading processing from the centralized
systems.
I am just trying to understand the need for streaming analytics engine at
the edge devices. An example use case justifying the need for such systems
would definitely help.
Thanks.
-Bhupesh
On Fri, Feb 19, 201
On Thursday, February 18, 2016, Katherine Marsden
wrote:
> On 2/17/2016 9:52 PM, Sandeep Deshmukh wrote:
>
>> I would be happy to be part of this interesting project.
>>
> Wonderful! Welcome and thank you for reviewing the proposal!
> I created an Additional Interested Contributors section and ad
On 2/17/2016 9:52 PM, Sandeep Deshmukh wrote:
I would be happy to be part of this interesting project.
Wonderful! Welcome and thank you for reviewing the proposal!
I created an Additional Interested Contributors section and added you
and May Wone who expressed interest in contributing as well.
Hi All,
I would be happy to be part of this interesting project. Processing at the
edge nodes is going to help a lot in analyzing @ scaling in IoT space.
While going through the proposal, I noticed following:
1. Email id of Daniel Debrunner is djd at *apache* dot *com*. Should
that be dot
On 2/15/2016 4:59 PM, Katherine Marsden wrote:
Find below a draft proposal for a new incubator project, Quarks for
discussion. Quarks is seeking experienced mentors as well as
contributors to the project. Please discuss and provide feedback. The
proposal is also available on the Wiki at
htt
Find below a draft proposal for a new incubator project, Quarks for
discussion. Quarks is seeking experienced mentors as well as
contributors to the project. Please discuss and provide feedback. The
proposal is also available on the Wiki at
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/QuarksProposal
<
20 matches
Mail list logo
