On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 5:52 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> John D. Ament wrote on 1/24/17 8:15 PM:
>> 2. Add a "Podling Maturity Assessment" to the individual podling reports.
>> This would give a clear opportunity for each podling to describe how they
>> are doing, perhaps compared to the maturity m
John D. Ament wrote on 1/24/17 8:15 PM:
> All,
>
> The Incubator PMC has received feedback from the board that changes may
> need to be made to the structure of our report. Specifically, there is
> confusion from the board members over how podlings get classified. There
> is also a request to in
I think we're all squared away on this. I'll commit the changes in the
next day or so, and we'll see what it looks like in March.
John
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 2:52 PM John D. Ament wrote:
> Jim,
>
> No, its all good and I appreciate your time on this. The APMM has been a
> source of confusion
Jim,
No, its all good and I appreciate your time on this. The APMM has been a
source of confusion repeatedly. If nothing else, this email reminded me I
need to shake that tree out a bit.
John
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:03 AM Jim Apple wrote:
> Ah, sorry for the paragraphs, then.
>
> On Tue,
+1
-Taylor
> On Jan 25, 2017, at 10:43 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> Just to provide, here's the proposed patch I have for the website
>
> Index: content/guides/ppmc.xml
> ===
> --- content/guides/ppmc.xml (revision 1780221)
> +++
(so sorry, I think my fingers got a little antsy and sent a blank reply)
+1 on #1
+1 on #2 given the clarification later in the thread.
+1 on #3. I don't view it as a burden to leave a comment. Most of the
time, I can just parrot events I was involved with, or a slightly more
detailed version o
Just to provide, here's the proposed patch I have for the website
Index: content/guides/ppmc.xml
===
--- content/guides/ppmc.xml (revision 1780221)
+++ content/guides/ppmc.xml (working copy)
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
Private Mail
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:40 AM P. Taylor Goetz wrote:
> I'm fine with 1 and 3, but 2 gives me pause. I like the idea of the
> maturity model, but is it yet another burden on mentors?
>
>
I would hope not. How often are mentors writing the reports for podlings,
vs pushing that the podlings writ
I'm fine with 1 and 3, but 2 gives me pause. I like the idea of the maturity
model, but is it yet another burden on mentors?
If we are trying to increase mentor engagement, we probably don't want to set
too high a bar.
-Taylor
> On Jan 24, 2017, at 8:15 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> All,
>
Ah, sorry for the paragraphs, then.
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 5:52 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Jim,
>
> Don't read too deeply into my use of "Podling Maturity Assessment." The
> sections of the current summary are simply "Ready to Graduate", "Some
> Community Growth", "No Release" and "Still Gettin
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 8:54 PM Julian Hyde wrote:
> John,
>
> What did you have in mind for “podling maturity assessment”? If it is
> simply one of the existing phases - “still getting started”, “no release”,
> “community growth”, “ready to graduate” - I can’t see that being
> contentious.
>
> J
John,
What did you have in mind for “podling maturity assessment”? If it is simply
one of the existing phases - “still getting started”, “no release”, “community
growth”, “ready to graduate” - I can’t see that being contentious.
Julian
> On Jan 24, 2017, at 5:39 PM, Jim Apple wrote:
>
> Th
Jim,
Don't read too deeply into my use of "Podling Maturity Assessment." The
sections of the current summary are simply "Ready to Graduate", "Some
Community Growth", "No Release" and "Still Getting Started." I'm simply
asking the podling to decide which of those 4 best describe themselves.
John
There were a number of people who opposed the use of the maturity
model on this list in 2016. For instance, Greg Stein said: "There has
been past controversy on including that as a graduation step. I'm not
clear that was a proper addition." and "The Board has never required
the IPMC to use the APMM
All,
The Incubator PMC has received feedback from the board that changes may
need to be made to the structure of our report. Specifically, there is
confusion from the board members over how podlings get classified. There
is also a request to increase and improve mentor feedback on podling
report
15 matches
Mail list logo
