I am also agree with suggestions of Ted and Tommas.
Since Meerkat will be developed on top of Hama, it can be managed under
Hama project like hama-graph. In addition, developing Meerkat will not make
Hama changed largely (even not at all), because Hama is generic BSP
framework.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2
2014-04-28 10:45 GMT+02:00 Ted Dunning :
> Edward,
>
> Sub-projects are generally frowned on. Incubator projects can graduate
> eventually to a top-level project, but starting a project as a sub is not
> so good. The incubator docs on this are pretty good reading.
>
> But if the committer commun
Thanks Ted. I generally agree with your suggestion.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> Edward,
>
> Sub-projects are generally frowned on. Incubator projects can graduate
> eventually to a top-level project, but starting a project as a sub is not
> so good. The incubator docs
Edward,
Sub-projects are generally frowned on. Incubator projects can graduate
eventually to a top-level project, but starting a project as a sub is not
so good. The incubator docs on this are pretty good reading.
But if the committer community for your real-time BSP is (or can be) the
same as
Hi guys,
As some people already might know, I'm recently working on real-time
data processing project on top of Hama BSP model, called Meerkat[1]
(currently only few developers (from two organizations, Kakaotalk and
DataSayer) are involved in this project).
According to our internal study, Storm-