RE: [DISCUSS] Incubating Project Policy

2007-02-05 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Ted Husted wrote: > Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > As noted by James Margaris, yourself, Bertrand, et al, this does not > > actually address the issue where someone is committing co-workers' > > work, rather than having the co-workers participating on-list. We > > are really looking to have those co-

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Project Policy

2007-02-05 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Noel J. Bergman wrote: > As noted by James Margaris, yourself, Bertrand, et al, this does > not actually address the issue where someone is committing co-workers' > work, rather than having the co-workers participating on-list. It does when the project pushes back; but I concur... > We are re

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Project Policy

2007-02-05 Thread Ted Husted
On 2/5/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As noted by James Margaris, yourself, Bertrand, et al, this does not actually address the issue where someone is committing co-workers' work, rather than having the co-workers participating on-list. We are really looking to have those co-w

[DISCUSS] Incubating Project Policy

2007-02-05 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Isn't it normal to have a discussion before calling for a vote? :-) A vote seems premature, given the current level of discussion. As you have later noted: > the thread's grown too long - it needs summarization. Early in the > week I'll start a wiki page to begin the clarifications (whys) and