On 2015-11-06 09:22, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
I checked over the resolution and it looks good except for one thing
I'm not certain about -- the two scope statements don't agree
precisely. One speaks of "a software framework" and the other, "ease
of development":
Excellent find. We'll harmonize t
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
> Heh; yes, you're right. As one of REEF's mentors, I'll add some of my
> observations of its community and development.
>
> The REEF project has built an open, welcoming, and diverse community.
> From my sampling of the dev@ list over the last
Heh; yes, you're right. As one of REEF's mentors, I'll add some of my
observations of its community and development.
The REEF project has built an open, welcoming, and diverse community.
>From my sampling of the dev@ list over the last year or so, all design
discussions (including infrastructure,
Hi,
thanks for the vote! Does that mean we should move straight to the IPMC
vote? I understood the incubation guide to first have a [DISCUSS], then
[VOTE] thread.
Markus
On 2015-11-02 13:56, Chris Douglas wrote:
> +1 (binding) -C
>
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Markus Weimer wrote:
>> Hi,
+1 (binding) -C
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Markus Weimer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the Apache REEF podling has discussed[0] and voted upon[1] graduation as
> a TLP. Following the incubation guide[3], we now ask for a feedback on
> our graduation.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Markus
>
> [0]: http://s.apache.org/re
Hi,
the Apache REEF podling has discussed[0] and voted upon[1] graduation as
a TLP. Following the incubation guide[3], we now ask for a feedback on
our graduation.
Thanks,
Markus
[0]: http://s.apache.org/reefgraduationdiscussion
[1]: http://s.apache.org/reefgraduationppmsvoteresult
[3]: http://
