Re: [DISCUSS] Amendment to podling retirement document

2013-01-06 Thread Benson Margulies
+1 here. On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > Should we declare lazy consensus? > > > Regards, > Alan > > On Dec 29, 2012, at 10:32 AM, Alan Cabrera wrote: > > > > > On Dec 22, 2012, at 9:09 PM, David Crossley wrote: > > > >> Alan Cabrera wrote: > >>> For your comments > >>

Re: [DISCUSS] Amendment to podling retirement document

2013-01-06 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
Should we declare lazy consensus? Regards, Alan On Dec 29, 2012, at 10:32 AM, Alan Cabrera wrote: > > On Dec 22, 2012, at 9:09 PM, David Crossley wrote: > >> Alan Cabrera wrote: >>> For your comments >>> >>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/RetiringPodlingsProposed >>> >>> I basically stol

Re: [DISCUSS] Amendment to podling retirement document

2012-12-29 Thread Alan Cabrera
On Dec 22, 2012, at 9:09 PM, David Crossley wrote: > Alan Cabrera wrote: >> For your comments >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/RetiringPodlingsProposed >> >> I basically stole Ross' comments and injected them into the top of the >> original document. > > That original wiki page was very

Re: [DISCUSS] Amendment to podling retirement document

2012-12-22 Thread David Crossley
Alan Cabrera wrote: > For your comments > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/RetiringPodlingsProposed > > I basically stole Ross' comments and injected them into the top of the > original document. That original wiki page was very out-of-date. See http://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.h

[DISCUSS] Amendment to podling retirement document

2012-12-22 Thread Alan Cabrera
For your comments http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/RetiringPodlingsProposed I basically stole Ross' comments and injected them into the top of the original document. I have a few questions. Do we leave it vague as to the number of mentors needed? Do we state that you cannot be a mentor if yo