On 8/14/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> Public IRC, free for anyone to join, at a channel that is 'officially'
> published/ promoted however, does.
No it doesn't.It's exclusionary in that email allows timezone
independent participation, and IMO,
I am +1 on the name.
On 8/10/06, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Aug 10, 2006, at 11:49 AM, Archit Shah wrote:
+1 for Qpid or QPid or QPID.
+1 I'd prefer if the acronym expansion is left unspecified as well.
Craig
>
> --
+1
On 7/31/06, Martin Sebor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it intended that either of the two mentions (specifically just
the URL) satisfy this requirement? I.e., that something like this
be sufficient on a third party web page that discusses the project:
http://incubator.apache.org/podling-n
Yes, any project that is part of the Incubator needs to refer to the Apache
Incubator in the first mention of the project in a contiguous body of work.
(e.g. one document, one web page, one article). Hopefully, our newly
devised policies and procedures will make this clearer to all
contributors/I
While I don't necessarily disagree with this guideline it doesn't
seem that it belongs here. Until a project is accepted no formal
relationship between the proposer and the ASF exists (right?), so
this guideline cannot be enforced or even expected to be known to
the proposing party. (It only seems
I would also propose:
The PRC is willing to issue formal press releases for all podlings who
successfully graduate from the Incubator and are interested in issuing a
press release. See below...
5. Until the Incubator PMC approves a podling proposal *and* the
podling initial drop code is in ou
+1
On 5/18/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1.
XML + Ajax isn't something I have an urge to leap into developing
with, but I don't see any reason why the project can't go ahead. My
understanding is that the initial committer list is largely from the
contributing company, so this i
Eww. We don't do "marketing". People like that we don't do that. ;-)
We prefer the euphemisms "community building" "community awareness" and
"community education" ;-)
Susan
