ilt against Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1
(1.0.5000.0). I don't think this is clearly documented. Is there any
reason why you have chosen to build against 1.1 rather than 1.0?
That's all that I can think of.
Cheers,
Nicko
Nicko Cadell
log4net development
http://logging.apache
s vote.
Thanks to all those who voted.
Cheers,
Nicko
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Yoav Shapira
> Sent: 18 April 2006 15:23
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve 1.2.10rc2
&g
It has been an interesting and informative experience.
Thanks for all your efforts.
Nicko
> -Original Message-
> From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 16 March 2005 10:14
> To: general@logging.apache.org
> Cc: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject:
nternational.org/publications/standards/Ecma-335.htm
[1]
http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-334.htm
Nicko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
be solely
ASF copyrighted and licensed.
Nicko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Mar 7, 2005, at 8:05 AM, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
> > Is there any opposition or reservations in relation to the log4net
> > snapshot release mentioned by Nicko and myself a few days ago?
> >
> > If not could we allow log4net to move forward?
>
> If the sub
> You expect someone to RTFM? ;-) Yes, there should be a
> README or similar notice file in both the directory and the package.
I have added a readme with the incubation disclaimer and updated the
test package.
Nicko
--
eing release?
Many thanks,
Nicko
> -Original Message-
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 08 March 2005 16:07
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: log4net 1.2.9 beta release
>
> Nicko,
>
> The package must include, as must the
Dear Incubator,
I have created a test package which can be downloaded from here:
http://www.apache.org/~nicko/log4net/
If this is not the correct place to publish a preview please let me know.
As I understand it, once the release is approved, it should be published at:
/www/cvs.apache.org/dist
