Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Allura from the Incubator

2014-03-17 Thread Cory Johns
wrote: > On 17 March 2014 16:53, Cory Johns wrote: > > Alex, > > > > The project is Allura, which does power the developer tools at > SourceForge, > > and we're using an Allura instance on an Apache VM to "self-host" the > > project. Since Allura

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Allura from the Incubator

2014-03-17 Thread Cory Johns
ourceForge wouldn't want Apache to have SourceForge branding on Apache > infrastructure. > > Are folks sure this is ok? > > -Alex > > On 3/17/14 9:09 AM, "sebb" wrote: > > >On 17 March 2014 15:17, Cory Johns wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 6

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Allura from the Incubator

2014-03-17 Thread Cory Johns
The "Brought to you by" line has been hidden. On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > On Mar 17, 2014, at 11:17 AM, Cory Johns wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 6:58 AM, sebb wrote: > > > >> On 15 March 2014 01:23, Justin Mclean

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Allura from the Incubator

2014-03-17 Thread Cory Johns
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 6:58 AM, sebb wrote: > On 15 March 2014 01:23, Justin Mclean wrote: > > > > While it's clear in the text and from the domain that the project is an > ASF one, the subtitles "Forge software for hosting software projects" and > "Brought to you by: brondsem, masterbunnyfu, r

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Allura from the Incubator

2014-03-14 Thread Cory Johns
Ok, I think we've addressed all of the issues. Namely: * The status page (http://incubator.staging.apache.org/projects/allura.html) has been updated, and now the correct canonical project web page (namely https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/), as well as having an improved project descriptio

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release of Apache Allura (incubating) v1.0.1

2013-11-11 Thread Cory Johns
Hello, Thanks for your support! The 72 hours have passed and we have 10 positive votes, of which 3 are binding and 7 are non-binding. We now have the required number of positive binding votes and will therefore proceed with the release. Thanks, Cory Johns Binding votes (3): +1 Rich Bowen +1

[VOTE] Release of Apache Allura (incubating) v1.0.1

2013-11-04 Thread Cory Johns
Hello, This is a call for a vote on Apache Allura 1.0.1 incubating. This is our second attempt at an initial release, which specifically addresses the concerns raised in the previous, cancelled vote. A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 8 +1's, and 0 -1's or +0's (with one

Re: [DISCUSS] Release of Apache Allura (incubating) v1.0.0

2013-09-25 Thread Cory Johns
ue, Sep 17, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Cory Johns wrote: > > I had one question regarding the NOTICE and LICENSE files issue that you > > mentioned on the [VOTE] thread. We were considering, in the future, > > potentially releasing each of the Allura and Forge sub-packages > separately

[CANCEL] [VOTE] Release of Apache Allura (incubating) v1.0.0

2013-09-18 Thread Cory Johns
We are canceling the vote for this release to address the license and procedure issues raised. Thanks, Cory On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 6:43 PM, sebb wrote: > On 28 August 2013 23:04, Cory Johns wrote: > > Hello, > > > > This is a call for a vote on Apache Allura 1.0.0 in

Re: [DISCUSS] Release of Apache Allura (incubating) v1.0.0

2013-09-17 Thread Cory Johns
which is why were providing separate NOTICE and LICENSE files for each sub-package. Is the separate pypi release something that the ASF release is amenable to, and, if so, should we still stick to a single NOTICE or single NOTICE & LICENSE file? Thanks, Cory On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 6:35

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Allura (incubating) v1.0.0

2013-09-09 Thread Cory Johns
%40mail.gmail.com%3E Mea culpa. On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Rich Bowen wrote: > On 08/28/2013 06:04 PM, Cory Johns wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> This is a call for a vote on Apache Allura 1.0.0 incubating. This is our >> first release. >> >> A vote was held on d

Re: [DISCUSS] Release of Apache Allura (incubating) v1.0.0

2013-09-09 Thread Cory Johns
.mbox/%3CCAGN0FaRRkT-SUmBTFQh9D0NCUp_CNae5ne51oDn0g3i2hFHDdA%40mail.gmail.com%3E On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Cory Johns wrote: > > > A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 9 +1's, and > 0 > &g

[VOTE] Release of Apache Allura (incubating) v1.0.0

2013-08-28 Thread Cory Johns
ote will be open for at least 1 week (4/Sep/2013 12PM IST) to allow for it being our first release. [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Thanks & Regards Cory Johns

Re: Ode Resources

2006-02-17 Thread cory
Yep, that's the address I was trying before. It worked on my last try. Thanks, -cory On 2/17/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You have to send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > It has worked for me. > > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > > cory wrote: &g

Re: Ode Resources

2006-02-17 Thread cory
Hi Dims, I was able to subscribe to the commits list, but my subscribe email to the dev list keeps getting kicked back? -cory On 2/17/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alan, > I've set up the following. > > Mailing listdev [EMAIL PROTECTED] &g

Ode Apache licensed source(Sybae donation)

2006-02-17 Thread cory
know if we need to change anything else. -cory - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Ode Proposal

2006-02-14 Thread cory
The license is in the tarball. I've also put it at: ftp://ftp.sybase.com/pub/incoming/wcss/bpe/ -cory On 2/14/06, Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Bill Flood wrote: > > The source can be foun