+1 non-binding
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 4:25 AM Justin Mclean wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>
;
> > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache ServiceComb" be
> > > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the
> > > direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache
> > > ServiceComb Project, and to have primary re
ubator-airflow/commit/e9a09c271dd8e1dc4fbe176761a1ce338f711d55
> >
>
> > On 19 Jul 2018, at 10:22, Yang Bo wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Bruin
> >
> > If we are only release the source package then it's OK.
> >
> > The files do exist in the source package
he binary package is probably a good
> idea so we will do so next release. Tests are not included in the binary
> release for obvious reasons.
>
> Can you please make sure you are reviewing the right artefact?
>
> Cheers
> Bolke
>
>
> > On 19 Jul 2018, at 08:35, Y
u are
> referring to are not part of the source tar.gz as far as I can see. I
> downloaded the tar.gz, unpacked it and checked for the files you mentioned.
>
> Cheers
> Bolke
>
> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
>
> > Op 19 jul. 2018 om 03:56 heeft Yang Bo het volgende
There are also some binary files (*.pyc) in the airflow/config_templates.
Those should be removed.
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 9:51 AM Yang Bo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found several minor issues regarding the LICENSE in the source release.
> 1. The LICENSE states that there are correspondin
Hi,
I found several minor issues regarding the LICENSE in the source release.
1. The LICENSE states that there are corresponding
licenses/LICENSE-[project] file for third parties but they do not exist.
2. There are some libraries that are not bundled in the source release but
are listed in the LIC
f
> with zero-copy access. Based on an earlier discussion, the resolution was
> to have both headers as well as a comment that says:
>
> /**
> * This file is derived from Google ProcolBuffer CodedInputStream class
> */
>
> Matteo
>
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 7:22 PM
Hi,
I checked the source release and found a minor issue:
pulsar-common/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/common/util/protobuf/ByteBufCoded{Input,Output}Stream.java
Those files are from google thus should not have ASF header in the source
file.
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 9:51 AM, Sijie Guo wrote:
>