Re: [Vote] call a vote for IoTDB incubation proposal

2018-11-08 Thread Yang Bo
+1 non-binding On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 4:25 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > +1 (binding) > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >

Re: RE: [VOTE] Graduate Apache ServiceComb (incubating)

2018-09-27 Thread Yang Bo
; > > > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache ServiceComb" be > > > and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the > > > direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache > > > ServiceComb Project, and to have primary re

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 1.10.0

2018-07-19 Thread Yang Bo
ubator-airflow/commit/e9a09c271dd8e1dc4fbe176761a1ce338f711d55 > > > > > On 19 Jul 2018, at 10:22, Yang Bo wrote: > > > > Hi, Bruin > > > > If we are only release the source package then it's OK. > > > > The files do exist in the source package

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 1.10.0

2018-07-19 Thread Yang Bo
he binary package is probably a good > idea so we will do so next release. Tests are not included in the binary > release for obvious reasons. > > Can you please make sure you are reviewing the right artefact? > > Cheers > Bolke > > > > On 19 Jul 2018, at 08:35, Y

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 1.10.0

2018-07-18 Thread Yang Bo
u are > referring to are not part of the source tar.gz as far as I can see. I > downloaded the tar.gz, unpacked it and checked for the files you mentioned. > > Cheers > Bolke > > Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad > > > Op 19 jul. 2018 om 03:56 heeft Yang Bo het volgende

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 1.10.0

2018-07-18 Thread Yang Bo
There are also some binary files (*.pyc) in the airflow/config_templates. Those should be removed. On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 9:51 AM Yang Bo wrote: > Hi, > > I found several minor issues regarding the LICENSE in the source release. > 1. The LICENSE states that there are correspondin

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 1.10.0

2018-07-18 Thread Yang Bo
Hi, I found several minor issues regarding the LICENSE in the source release. 1. The LICENSE states that there are corresponding licenses/LICENSE-[project] file for third parties but they do not exist. 2. There are some libraries that are not bundled in the source release but are listed in the LIC

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 1.22.1-incubating Candidate 2

2018-06-07 Thread Yang Bo
f > with zero-copy access. Based on an earlier discussion, the resolution was > to have both headers as well as a comment that says: > > /** > * This file is derived from Google ProcolBuffer CodedInputStream class > */ > > Matteo > > On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 7:22 PM

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 1.22.1-incubating Candidate 2

2018-06-07 Thread Yang Bo
Hi, I checked the source release and found a minor issue: pulsar-common/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/common/util/protobuf/ByteBufCoded{Input,Output}Stream.java Those files are from google thus should not have ASF header in the source file. On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 9:51 AM, Sijie Guo wrote: >