+1 binding(ish)
On Mon, 8 Jan 2018, at 7:46 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> +1. (Binding)
>
> > On Jan 8, 2018, at 10:56 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > This is a call to vote for the retirement of the Wave podling.
> >
> > The podling has positively voted to retire [1]. I now call up
source code donation,
and it has accepted new committers.
I am starting to consider that this has to be sufficient activity to
justify graduation, although it is certainly on the lower limit.
Thoughts?
Upayavira
On Tue, 14 Feb 2017, at 03:16 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Upayavira,
>
> I'
I would appreciate assistance in deciding whether Wave needs more than
its current slow, but not stationary, development.
Upayavira
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, at 06:07 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Awesome news, thanks everyone.
>
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 12:17 PM Suneel Marthi
> wrote:
&g
John,
Can you update the proposal to include a definition of CDI for those of
us that don't know what it means?
Thanks!
Upayavira
On Fri, 16 Dec 2016, at 03:03 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for some additional mentors for a potential new podling -
> H
Apologies for my delay. With the following comment I sign off on Wave:
"Once more Wave is on the brink of retirement. However, this time, an
offer has been made of code from SwellRT, which is a fork of Wave
itself, and a concall has been scheduled for interested parties to
discuss whether it is a
Regarding Wave, I'm happy to sign off the report, just didn't get time
and got stuck regaining access to my wiki account given slow responses
from Moin. And yes, if Wave continues in the incubator, it really could
do with more mentors.
Upayavira
On Mon, 11 Apr 2016, at 11:56 AM, Joh
tly, it is RTC, but not seemingly in the sense you are objecting
to.
Upayavira
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 08:35 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> I think this is a distraction. You said it best the other day: RTC
> implies
> the need for "permission" before making a change to the codebase.
review, then another committer must commit it".
If we're gonna debate RTC, can we please describe which of these we are
talking about (or some other mechanism that I haven't described)?
Otherwise, we will end up endlessly debating over the top of each other.
Upayavira
On Wed, Nov
t you mean by CTR or RTC before diving into further
discussions about their relative merit. Otherwise we'll get locked into
yet another ongoing discussion that leads nowhere!
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: gen
Ian,
Please bear in mind that this release vote is to validate the legal
aspects of the release, not its technical merits. Technical merits can
be resolved in subsequent releases.
Upayavira
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015, at 02:51 PM, Ian Dunlop wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash:
n the low energy in Wave right now,
I'd suggest we roll the above fixes into the process of managing this
release.
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
gt; already supposed to get involved? How is this building community? I see
> the Sentry podling creating code... just not much evidence of a
> community outside what Sentry came in with.
I have no comment/perspective on the rest of this.
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
I think you mean "find". It could, otherwise, get expensive!!
Upayavira
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015, at 05:17 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> I see this as the Champions role. You could ask for volunteers, and it
> will get you folks but you really want people who are invested. As a
> cha
who you maybe know
to have an interest. Attempt to sell the project.
Whatever ways you can that will interest a potential mentor in signing
up.
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For addition
Done.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015, at 09:59 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> The userid is RalphGoers.
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Aug 4, 2015, at 5:41 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Ralph Goers
> >> wrote:
> >> For some reason I am not able to edit any pages on the incubator wik
Try now.
On Thu, May 21, 2015, at 11:15 AM, shibasis sengupta wrote:
> Thanks Upayavira for the suggestion.
>
> Dear Members, can anyone please grant me access to create a page? My user
> name is "shibasis sengupta".
> I am trying to submit a project for ASF incu
provide your username here and someone will grant you write access.
Upayavira
On Wed, May 20, 2015, at 02:29 PM, shibasis sengupta wrote:
> Dear Members,
>
> When I am trying to create a new page for my proposal I am getting the
> error -
> " You are not allowed to edit this
n a project that it needs in order to support
the work of the Foundation. If that happens to be contributing to an ASF
project, so be it. However, they are not gaining any special privilege,
they are as it were "paid by an external entity" just like all other
contributors to any other ASF p
Not that I’m aware of, but sending a pile of emails isn’t out of this
world complicated.
If you gave me a list of email addresses of people who had explicitly
said “subscribe me”, I could do that very easily.
Upayavira
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015, at 04:57 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Do we have
“do that” == “subscribe them"
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015, at 05:01 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> Not that I’m aware of, but sending a pile of emails isn’t out of this
> world complicated.
>
> If you gave me a list of email addresses of people who had explicitly
> said “subscribe me”,
F to do with it what it wants to do.
Only the owner of the code can “grant” additional privileges. As we’ve
noted, that’s an unclear thing. No-one has the right to speak on behalf
of the many contributors to the original codebase without asking their
permission first. Fortunately, we don’t need to
+1
Upayavira
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015, at 06:55 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Following the discussion earlier in the thread:
>http://s.apache.org/KWE
>
> I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Groovy
> as a new incubator project.
>
> The proposal is avai
the vote will run for.
Upayavira
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015, at 06:27 PM, Pascal Schumacher wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> when will the voting start? Or if it did start already when will there
> be decision?
>
> Thanks and kind
When Stephen Connolly says ”We @ Maven will have a full dump of the
Codehaus JIRA and we have a VM set
up to test migration…” isn’t he implying that the Groovy issues are
*included* in that? I.e. there’s not so much for you to worry about
here?
Upayavira
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015, at 12:13 AM, Jochen
; On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Ted Dunning
> > wrote:
> > > Upayavira,
> > >
> > > Mind if I add your comment to the wave report?
> >
> > The report for March has been filed already. I've initialized the wiki
> > template for our April repo
Although, I should also make this point directly on wave-dev. I have
long been quiet there, and it would be unfair for this to arise without
their prior warning.
Upayavira
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015, at 08:42 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> Please do.
>
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2015, at 06:54 PM, Ted Dunn
the project.
Reluctantly, I would be supportive of moving the project elsewhere.
Upayavira
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015, at 06:39 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hi Roman,
>
> you might have noticed, that one of the mentors (me) were actively
> asking for this report. I simply forgot to si
example, a normal TLP produce an incubated or provisional
product?
Upayavira
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015, at 03:00 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> On 3/4/15 1:41 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Doug Cutting > <mailto:cutt...@apache.org>> wrote:
>
sh a podling, that does a active job to replace a
> mentor.
The IPMC *cannot* replace a mentor. We have no power to make someone
take on that role. Alan, please add a section to your doc about the fact
that podlings retain responsibility for engaging with their mentors, and
for recruiting replacemen
'd much rather we be clear with projects right up front, saying
something like:
"To join the Incubator, you need one or more mentors. To get to
graduation, you will need the support of those mentors. If mentors
become unavailable, you will need to seek replacements. Unless you have
already learned the ways of the ASF and are ready to graduate, you will
need to keep engaged with your mentors. If possible, engage in the wider
ASF, and develop connections with others who might be in a position to
assist with mentorship should one or all of your current mentors become
unable to fulfill the role. "
This is, actually, what happens, and I'd much rather we just said it
like that :-)
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
cubator PMC has the ability to "assign"
people to a project, which is simply never going to happen.
The best we can do is provide as much guidance to projects about how to
engage their mentors, and how best to attract replacements when those
mentors go awol, or leave gracefully. That much t
lso - that knowledge and ability shouldn't be locked into the
incubator PMC.
That seems the one missing piece as yet undiscussed in the various
"disband the incubator" discussions.
Upayavira
On Thu, Jan 1, 2015, at 01:41 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Roman,
>
> Thank
that sort of situation.
Upayavira
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014, at 03:33 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Ted Dunning
> wrote:
> > ...Of course, it isn't politic to ask a high profile mentor to recuse
> > themselves for lack of helping
&
iance upon salaried developers" with "Please detail the
spread of volunteer vs paid contributor amongst the proposed
committers".
etc, etc.
Sure, people will work out what the "expected" answers are, but I always
felt that there was something definitely wrong with the topic hea
ought,
Upayavira
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014, at 10:33 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> On Sep 3, 2014, at 2:11 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Marvin Humphrey
> > wrote:
> >
> >> So how about creating the web form but having it generate
ty otherwise.
>
> That said, reminding people of the "release often and early" thing is
> good to do,
> but also have in mind that incubator releases are very difficult to
> make.
Unlike Christian (another Wave mentor :-) ), I am generally in support
of this proposal. If a
have
wanted to stay here, and mentors have considered this acceptable.
Upayavira
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014, at 12:33 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I would like to kindly request some assistance
> from the mentors of the following projects: devicemap,
> kalumet, s4, wave and np
FWIW as far as I am concerned, you can 'conditionally' sign off on a
report, that is, with comments, if there's things you need to say.
Upayavira
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014, at 12:17 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> The podling in question is Stratos.
>
> There was a lengthy disc
I would suggest doing the vote and the name discussion simultaneously.
Hopefully the name discussion can be resolved by the time infra is ready
to do its stuff. It really is a good idea to avoid extra infra work, and
multiple mailing list changes, if it can be helped.
Upayavira
On Tue, Apr 8
g the foundation's policies doesn't.
Upayavira
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013, at 05:51 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:50 AM, ant elder wrote:
>
> > And the Incubator _is_ different and does have different policy and
> > rules, hence on occasion podlings bei
started by the champion or proposed mentors of the project.
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
stay present with the podling.
Does anyone here disagree with that sentiment?
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Currently listed at 180+.
Upayavira
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013, at 10:17 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote:
> On 23/11/13 09:30, ant elder wrote:
> > (...) The Incubator PMC is so big and diverse now (...)
>
> Sorry, off-topic, but interesting for me to get a better understanding
> of the
Marvin, you have my wholehearted agreement.
Upayavira
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013, at 07:18 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> > 1) I think there is more to PPMC membership than just voting on releases.
>
> I'm sure that everyo
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013, at 03:41 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 11/17/13 3:17 AM, "Upayavira" wrote:
>
> >
> >With a two tier model - with PPMC membership granting voting rights on
> >podling releases, then a podling would start with just mentors on i
we're at it. Sure, it'll probably be alright, but best to offer
someone something at a point when they have some appreciation of what
they are joining, no?
Upayavira
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013, at 01:24 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Joining a PMC does not meaning being handed even one o
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013, at 04:59 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 11/16/13 8:47 AM, "Upayavira" wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> >Alex,
> >
> >I'm not sure I see the difference between a release auditor and an IPMC
> >member. If someon
k either, and
> solutions need to be found to somehow get those mentors to find the time
> to meet their obligations.
Alex,
I'm not sure I see the difference between a release auditor and an IPMC
member. If someone is sufficiently clued up to audit a release, then
they're surely ready to join the Incubator PMC. Am I missing something?
My interest is in a lesser level of involvement, where someone has shown
merit within their own PPMC and can get a binding vote there, but
no-where else. That feels to me like a very useful intermediate step to
have.
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
he size of the
merit granted fit the stage at which an individual is at.
I presume #4 is: Three +1 votes from PPMC members required.
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
can
> the count votes of those who assent.
Isn't lazy majority simply "at least 3 +1 votes"?
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Whoops. Wrong email. Oh well. Creating that video was fun anyway.
Upayavira
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013, at 10:42 AM, Upayavira wrote:
> Thanks for that!
>
> Here's another that someone posted:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7EfnGMEjgK4&feature=youtu.be
>
> Upayavira
>
PMC) that just doesn't quite fit,
rather than seeking a structure that will suit the both the incubator
and the foundation, allowing merit to be recognised in individuals at a
range of stages within a podlings lifecycle.
Upayavira
-
Thanks for that!
Here's another that someone posted:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7EfnGMEjgK4&feature=youtu.be
Upayavira
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013, at 06:49 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Martijn Dashorst
> wrote:
> > The short guide to graduation
need to inform the board of
the change of composition of 'sub-committees'?
My thought is that if we can clarify what is legally possible, we will
be better placed to find the appropriate model for the incubator that
fits within those legal/bylaw bounds.
Upayavira
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013, a
And Apache Wave too (which is what I first saw before I read the title
more carefully).
Upayavira
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013, at 09:12 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
> Hi,
> I am concerned about potential confusion with Apache Commons Weaver
> [1].
>
> Matt
>
> [1] https://comm
you willing to start a new thread expressing your issues
with that document?
Thanks, Upayavira
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013, at 08:22 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> I don't think I've seen the template before, or it was too long ago and I
> failed to notice at the time.
>
>
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013, at 01:52 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:18 AM, Upayavira wrote:
>
> > As in any such survey, author identity should be optional. Sometimes it
> > can be deduced, but not always, and if someone would rather not mention
> > th
as a PMC in training, their votes are considered important.
In Wave so far, all committers are also PPMC members, so Ali could have
just labelled folks 'PPMC' instead of 'committer' and Joe's concern
would have been addressed.
Upayavira
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013, at 01:14 AM
something you can be judged against is useful.
Upayavira
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013, at 10:37 PM, Rob Vesse wrote:
> I have written up the suggestions so far into a wiki page
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WhatToExpect
>
> The content is pretty much what has been included in this threa
on the incubator general list. If the optic is
too sensitive to discuss in public (eg a potential committer) you may
contact the incubator ombudsman at x...@apache.org.
Upayavira
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013, at 05:40 PM, Rob Vesse wrote:
> +1
>
> Having also come to Apache by joining a now
Anomnity of the individual not the project. I can say "my mentor was
crap" without stating my name - I could be any one of the PPMC.
Upayavira
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013, at 10:32 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:18:16AM +0100, Upayavira wrote:
> >
> >
t; attempt at anonymization will be dangerously futile.
As in any such survey, author identity should be optional. Sometimes it
can be deduced, but not always, and if someone would rather not mention
their name, we should give them that opportunity.
Upayavira
---
Alexei,
To answer your two points.
Firstly they may want to complain in private. Without that option they
may just suffer in silence.
As to your Eco-champion idea, can I suggest you add it to the wiki page
Bertrand created?
Upayavira
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013, at 06:50 AM, Alexei Fedotov wrote
proposal that was current at the time the vote was
initiated. As I understand it, if the change was Sanjiva saying he won't
claim the trademark, then that's great - he can say it here, or update
the proposal doc or whatever, to reassure people, but the relevant
document was essentially fix
Done.
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013, at 12:36 PM, Klevenz, Stephan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> May I have permission to add and edit OData proposal on the Incubator
> wiki? My username is StephanKlevenz.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Stephan
-
To unsubscri
annot recruit replacements? Can we make any promises at
that point?
Upayavira
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013, at 03:16 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Since I realize that most of you can't be
> bothered to look at the wiki page I created ;-),
> I'll go ahead and post the current content
> here
tification, which are important to community
building.
Upayavira
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013, at 11:58 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> Apologies if this horse has been beaten already, but... have we
> discussed the concept of splitting incubator operations into a handful
> of separate groups, based
Done.
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013, at 06:58 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> Hey all -
>
> Could I get write permission to the wiki, specifically for
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/June2013 and the like? Username is
> AndrewBayer.
>
> A.
--
that 'competitors' don't, such that potential
mentors will feel motivated to support the project.
Upayavira
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013, at 07:17 AM, Alexei Fedotov wrote:
> There is no requirement to be different to join, I just wonder
> 06.06.2013 9:36 пользователь
You need to let us know your wiki username, and we will grant you write
access.
Upayavira
On Wed, May 29, 2013, at 03:48 PM, Afkham Azeez wrote:
> Hi folks,
> Can somebody let me know what is the process of obtaining write access to
> the incubator wiki? I need to add an incubator
I think it was just a question of 'retiring' sounding too final. Using
the word 'dormant' was less threatening, and made it more feasible for
the podlings to go, well, dormant.
Upayavira
On Mon, May 27, 2013, at 05:39 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
> They kinda sound the same. W
that happens,
I'd say it would be a good thing for mentors/champions to take some of
that load off the incubator PMC. It need merely be a reply to a Marvin
'are you there' email.
Upayavira
On Tue, May 7, 2013, at 04:37 PM, Tim Williams wrote:
> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Benso
or a
mentor for that matter, and this proposal moves gently in that
direction.
If folks approve, we'll need to seek champions for all existing
podlings, and decide what to do about those for which we cannot identify
one.
Upayavira
On Mon, May 6, 2013, at 02:56 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
&
You could add an {acl} entry to the top of the page restricting write
access to AdminGroup - that'd achieve making it read-only.
Upayavira
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013, at 03:53 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Dave Fisher
> wrote:
>
> > Does ht
This is an interesting idea. It does, however, assume that the person
who starts a thread is able to be sufficiently neutral to represent the
whole story, rather than their own particular take on it. Such
summarisation is something of an art.
Upayavira
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013, at 02:15 PM, Alan
rogress, which is the
task that the board has delegated to the Incubator PMC already.
An amalgam of the various approaches already suggested.
As I said, just a thought.
Upayavira
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013, at 09:06 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Ross Gardler
> wrote:
articulate the
problems do you see the incubator as having, that need to be solved?
That is, without (yet) suggesting how it should be fixed?
I'd be very curious to hear how you see it.
Upayavira
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013, at 02:00 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> Hi Niall,
>
> First o
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013, at 07:12 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Upayavira wrote:
> > We need one set who are 'incubator people' and another who are 'mentors'.
>
> Disenfranchising mentors and hoarding power within a small c
s we can get, and a smaller group of
people who are delegated responsibility for the incubator. The board
wants a group of folks to take responsibility for overseeing the early
life of communities at the ASF. These are, to my mind, the criteria that
we should be using to evaluate any suggestions as to how the incubator
should be structured. If it doesn't meet these, it won't float.
Judging the success of any new structure will be easy: does it create
peace and quiet (and more effective working) like the breakup of the PRC
did??
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
rding is a new thing, loosely based upon an approach that the
board has used for some time. I'm sure it is largely undocumented. I
suspect that generally speaking it is incubator PMC members that do
shepherding, but if someone reads reports and
much bigger
> pool of potential mentors, and IPMC'ers would get much more visibility
> of people as they work here which should make the PMC voting easier.
The structural problem here is that at the ASF, it is only PMC members
whose votes are bindi
entored project X", and I see myself listed with
karma on projects I mentored, which gives me kudos in the outside world.
I'd personally rather not loose that kudos, it is kinda cool. Yet, do we
want to 'give that' in return for zero activity? Did they really mentor
project X?
I really appreciate.
So sure, let's not force out people who are having a bad month or
something, but surely we should only be listing as mentors those that
are actually paying some attention to the podling?
Upayavira
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013, at 11:59 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> I'd sugge
Done
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013, at 08:49 PM, Devaraj Das wrote:
> Could I please get write access on the wiki content under
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/. My username is DevarajDas.
>
> Thanks
> Devaraj
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
s I
understand it, be sufficient.
That is my understanding of the discussion that happened around the time
when the JIRA tick-box was removed: it isn't needed.
Upayavira
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013, at 12:13 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Matthieu Mor
into its own. The process of
creating a new community and integrating one into another are completely
different tasks that require differing approaches.
Have I got it right?
Upayavira
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013, at 05:52 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On 2/27/13 9:44 AM
tors also makes sense, as these are people they
are going to be working with.
Just some reflections.
Upayavira
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013, at 12:27 AM, Josh Wills wrote:
> I thought that the need for diversity referred to the community, not to
> the
> mentors.
>
> I strongly advocate
they want, which could well be just the feeling that they have
contributed something of value to the world.
Upayavira
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013, at 12:13 PM, Gary Martin wrote:
> On 24 January 2013 18:52, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
> > If you model the IPMC as a group of volunteers
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012, at 11:39 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 5:21 AM, Upayavira wrote:
> > Personally, I'm not against nagging. Actually, when I'm on the receiving
> > end, I usually appreciate it, as timeliness is not a quality I am widely
>
We encourage (more earlier in the process of
incubation, less later) and if after a few nags they don't do it, then
DNR is just fine.
Upayavira
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012, at 09:04 AM, David Crossley wrote:
> Tim Williams wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Benson Margulies
>
I hereby note my sign off of the wave report, and ask for a volunteer to
update the wiki page on my behalf. My currently available technology is
simply not up to the task.
Thx, Upayavira
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012, at 04:03 PM, Yegor Kozlov wrote:
> I signed off the report for Openmeetings.
>
&
Yes, true, but any invitation to communicate such difficulties is
welcome IMO.
Upayavira
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012, at 02:37 AM, Tim Williams wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
> > First of several reminders:
> >
> > For podlings reporting in
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012, at 07:49 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Upayavira wrote on Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 06:48:28 +:
> > Having said that, I personally would like to see some kind of separation
> > between mentors and the incubator PMC. I think th PMC should be a
> > smaller,
hough.
Upayavira
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012, at 03:20 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
> > I want to thank all of you for the vote(s) of confidence in recommending me
> > as the IPMC chair. While it's always possible that th
might help with. It is not uncommon for
mentors to feel stretched, and thus might appreciate some help with
their mentoring duties.
Upayavira
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012, at 06:19 AM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > ever
good question, and probably one for legal-discuss.
It seems that most of the time deleting from svn is enough, although
that's not a definitive statement!
Upayavira
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012, at 11:16 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> We have a situation with CloudStack where we have some jars th
This is something I recall from clarifications by Roy some while back -
made a lot of sense to me. I'm not aware of it being documented
anywhere, nor am I aware of it having been collectively agreed. If we
can work out where, I'd be happy to write it up.
Upayavira
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012
patibility issues that exist before
code is checked in.
Upayavira
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012, at 01:14 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Podling frequently check in dubious IP as part of initial imports, and
> then clean up HEAD later. I've never seen any evidence of a more
&
up to the copyright holder (assuming they knew it was there at all).
Upayavira
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012, at 11:14 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> If you've not released it and you've deleted it from HEAD of all
> branches, I think you're fine.
>
> Noah Slater wrote on Sun
technically valid or
useful release. That said, a release that is full of holes might
actually have the counter-intuitive effect of drawing in fresh
developers who want to fix those holes.
Upayavira
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012, at 02:01 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
> Is there anything that could
1 - 100 of 342 matches
Mail list logo
