Re: [VOTE] Accept Wicket into the Incubator

2006-09-02 Thread Timothy Bennett
On 8/24/06, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [ ] +1 Accept Wicket as an Incubator podling [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Reject this proposal for the following reason: +1 (non-binding) -- timothy

Re: [pre-proposal] AsyncWeb

2006-07-31 Thread Timothy Bennett
ved with AsyncWeb with Dave and Alex and Trustin over at Safehaus, and I'm highly interested in continuing to be part of the project's initial community at the ASF. Thanks Peter, for getting this ball rolling, and thanks to Jim and Paul for supporting us! -- timothy bennett

Re: [PROPOSAL] Incubate Wicket

2006-07-31 Thread Timothy Bennett
support of the 1.2 and 1.3 codebases while incubating. I'm sure an appropriate strategy that is in the best interest of Wicket's user/customer base and in the best interest of ASF practices and policies can be discerned. Welcome Eelco, Martijn, Igor, and the rest of the Wicket crew! -- timothy bennett

Re: [Wicket] As erspective podling candidate

2006-03-04 Thread Timothy Bennett
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: I've been tracking the progress of the Wicket community for a while now, as I've personally adopted Wicket as a web application development framework, both privately and professionally. What!?!?!?! Not Ruby On Rails Do your friends know? :) hehehe... rails..