+1 (Binding, iPMC)
Superb!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 7:14 AM, Henning Schmiedehausen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This vote will run until Monday, July 21st, 2008.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Click for incubation
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason:
--
So, where do we stand on the vote? Is the vote still open, or are we
going to resolve XAP-579 (source and binary builds) and try again with
a 0.5.1 ?
I've been reviewing the 0.5.0 build. I'm not sure all of the samples
work, because I'm not sure what all of them are suppose to do :), but
I would l
Here's my binding +1 on the Thrift proposal.
On Jan 23, 2008 9:07 PM, Mark Slee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We've just posted the Apache Incubator proposal for Thrift onto the
> Wiki:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ThriftProposal
--
On that note, since there has been so discussion on this thread, I
think it might be time to open another thread and formally decide
whether to accept the Thrift proposal, which I will go do now.
-Ted.
On Feb 7, 2008 9:14 AM, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 to Ted's message. I am
Yes, there is a subtle disjoint or two. :)
Excluding patches that simply modify an existing artifact, we do need
licensing agreements from all individual contributors, regardless of
whether they become ASF committers or members of the podling PMC.
Otherwise, the ASF does not have clear title to th
+1
On Jan 5, 2008 2:27 PM, Bill Stoddard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks to everyone who made contributions to this proposal and special
> thanks to Niclas and Aaron for stepping up as mentors. The project is
> documented here:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BlueSky
>
> Please vote on ac
If you decide to move forward on this Mark, I would be glad to help.
-Ted.
http://husted.com/blog/
On Nov 28, 2007 5:12 PM, Mark Slee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just a quick note to announce Thrift's official intention to join the
> Apache Incubator and introduce ourselves to the A
+1 for the overall proposal (binding)
On 8/29/07, Janne Jalkanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> I am Janne Jalkanen, the lead developer of the open source wiki
> engine called JSPWiki, and I have a proposal for your enjoyment.
> This proposal is available in the web at http://www.jspw
IMHO, unless there are trademark or licensing issues involved, there
should be no "Apache rules" about Java package naming schemes. Package
names are an arbitrary implementation detail, and the one and only
concern should be what makes the most sense to the individual
community. When it comes to i
On 6/4/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
none of the guides are policy - just stuff that people think might be helpful
I'd suggest that Community Building Guide is not only helpful to
podlings, but to any of our Projects at any stage of life. Perhaps, we
should frame this as
On 5/22/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At one point, we had people becoming members of the Incubator PMC by
> virtue of being a Mentor or by virtue of a vote of the Incubator PMC.
> Did that change? This language implies that the Mentors must be
> pre-existing members of the Inc
At one point, we had people becoming members of the Incubator PMC by
virtue of being a Mentor or by virtue of a vote of the Incubator PMC.
Did that change? This language implies that the Mentors must be
pre-existing members of the Incubator PMC.
Is there a reason why we are saying "chosen by the
+1 (binding)
On 4/18/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Incubator PMC,
The Trinidad community believes that Trinidad is ready for graduation, as
evidenced by this vote (see [1]).
We would like to initiate a vote to graduate to be a subproject of the
Apache MyFaces project. Ther
+1 (binding)
I'll bring this up on the iBATIS.NET list and Spring.NET lists, which
we also use.
-Ted.
On 4/17/07, George Aroush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Folks,
Please help us to get our first official Lucene.Net release out the door.
I'm still waiting on one more +1 vote. The review has
On 4/12/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> but
> it presumes the Mentor == ASF Member (and all members may join the iPMC
> with a ping-ack). Veto to that interpretation - you were right... needs
> to be updated.
this is a new and radically different interpretation. changing
On 4/12/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* when necessary *
given some of the problems that have been percolating all the way to
general@, there are some problems in mentorships. The hammer is only
applicable to things that are not acceptable ever - backroom (offlist)
decisi
On 4/11/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Cast a binding vote in the project? Yes, of course. Mentorship is a heavier
hammer than that, when necessary.
As a three-time Mentor, I would venture that anyone who mentors with a
hammer doesn't understand the role :)
-Ted.
--
On 4/10/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bottom line, what is the *motivation* to have non-ASF-member Mentorships?
I've already stated mine. To me, it's self-evident that if a person is
qualified to serve on the Incubator PMC, then that individual is
qualified to serve as a p
On 4/9/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd agree with you if I perceived Mentorship as a privilege. I don't,
I view it entirely as a responsibility to convey "What is Apache" to
an aspiring podling. I don't disagree that any of our iPMC members
(members of any PMC at the fou
On 4/9/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you can give me some counter examples of why non ASF member mentorship
is a positive thing, I'd certainly consider those.
It seems inconsistent to me that we would say to someone, yes, you
have earned sufficient merit to serve on the
As I understand it, once the proposal is accepted, the Mentors listed
on the proposal become IPMC members. Once the proposal is accepted,
and the group becomes a podling, then, yes, all Mentors and IPMC
Members.
But, in order to be listed on a proposal, AFAIK, a Mentor does not
need to be a pre-e
On 4/5/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i've always assumed that every mentor needed to be a member but IMHO
we should really consider what the rule should be and then vote to
amend the policy appropriately.
At one time, there was only one mentor, and now there are three, an
+1 (binding)
I'm impressed by both the quantity and quality of volunteers named in
this proposal, and I expect that a robust, vibrant community will be
the end result.
-Ted.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For addit
On 3/28/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why not making it a *rule* to change the subject of podling release
votes, where things come up, that needs to be fixed.
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#notes-revote
-T.
--
On 3/15/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Two parts to the vote:
ONE: Should Incubator tarballs go in the normal place (and thus mirrors).
[x] +1
[ ] -1
TWO: Should there be an Incubator maven repository.
[ ] +1
[x] -1
So long as Incubator releases are distributed as artifacts of
On 3/15/07, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If these are indeed going to be official releases, we should totally
dispense with the requirements for "-incubating" in artifact filenames
and version numbers, let them announce the releases on announcements@
mailing lists, and all the othe
On 2/5/07, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sunday 04 February 2007 22:42, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> * donations (whether covered by a CLA, JIRA opt in or a software grant)
Shouldn't we avoid the word "donation"?? Code is not donated to ASF, it is
licensed. "Time" is perhaps don
On 2/5/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As noted by James Margaris, yourself, Bertrand, et al, this does not actually
address the
issue where someone is committing co-workers' work, rather than having the
co-workers
participating on-list. We are really looking to have those
co-w
On 2/2/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If they aren't a committer yet, they post a patch (jira or list) just like
every other wannabe future committer. When the volume and quality are
reasonable, they are offered commit access. But the suggested policy is to
state "no backch
On 2/1/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No third-party code (beyond bugzilla and mailing list submissions) may be
directly committed without first posing the submission to the mailing list.
This goes for submissions by associates who are unaffiliated with the
project, p
If it's helpful, the notes we are using for the Struts 2 release under
Maven are here:
* http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/creating-and-signing-a-distribution.html
They are very specific, mainly because I'm getting on in years, and if
we don't have specific notes, I forget how to do things :)
-
On 11/14/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
People should be helping make SubWiki the best thing since
sliced breads instead of routinely having this discussion...
You mean this SubWiki?
* http://www.webdav.org/wiki/projects/SubWiki
* http://subwiki.tigris.org/
Though, if I wanted to
- doing with Trac what we orignally wanted to do with Subversion.
+ doing with Trac what we orignally wanted to do with SubWiki.
On 11/14/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's under the Apache License now and integrates with Subversion. A
reasonable idea would be look at
On 11/13/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What triggered me to write a response earlier in the first place
however, was the negative vibe that pulsated from the message. Does
Apache have grave problems finding enough volunteers? Is it felt too
many projects incubated without trying
On 11/10/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes. But a project hosted at say Sourceforge can share those values
equally (or sometimes even better imo, as they don't have to cope with
politics).
Exactly!
It's important that we *discourage* dilettante applicants who decide
to join th
On 11/10/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And yet it seems very attractive. Visibility makes it a lot easier for
communities to grow. Maybe not for a SourceForge success story, but
definitely for smaller projects. Brand recognition the same.
We have our share of projects with small
On the incubator site, we mention the How, Who, and When of
incubation. I thought we might also want to discuss the "Why".
Toward that end, here's my own short list of reason why projects
should, or should not, apply for incubation.
Top three reasons why a project should join the ASF
1. A deve
On 11/9/06, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When infrastructure votes to maintain it for as long as the
projects wish to use it, then it is infrastructure. Right now,
Confluence is just an experiment and we made that abundantly clear.
The first two people who promised to maintain it d
On 11/6/06, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We're working on setting up the UIMA project, and I'd be interested in
hearing opinions from the community about the pros/cons of the different
approaches (perhaps there even are others in use at Apache?).
Thanks for the post Marshall. I've
By contributing the documentation, you are assigning an non-exclusive,
non-revocable copywrite to that version of the material. If you are
also using the same material elsewhere, and also grant that entity a
copyright, that's OK, because the copyright to ASF is non-exclusive.
An essential questio
On 5/2/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The various threads related to community proposals, the Apache Way, trolls,
etc. :-)
The individual behind these threads has created similar churn on other
ASF lists, such as Velocity. The individual works on a product that is
an alternativ
+1 (binding)
On 3/5/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> Tobago would like to sign-off from the incubator.
>
> This is the link to the project-status page:
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/tobago.html
>
> My (non-binding) +1.
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
---
On 3/2/06, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This (and what Jim said a few minutes ago) is consistent with my
> understanding of the current situation. I just made changes to the
> proposal on Wiki to reflect that DB PMC is a sponsor. See this link
> with highlighted changes:
>
> http://
Has the DB project voted to accept the sponsorship?
If DB is going to be the sponsor, then another vote by the Incubator
PMC is unnecessary.
-Ted.
On 3/2/06, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sorry, this is confusion on my end. I will change the Sponsor to DB,
> but is this consiste
+1
-Ted.
On 3/2/06, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to call a vote on our incubator proposal. There hasn't been
> any negative feedback so far, we found mentors, and we are eager to
> move ahead with the process.
>
> See the latest proposal text below.
>
> Andrus
--
If we are moving from the general case to the specific, then, yes, it
may be that the MyFaces PMC will decide the existing community cannot
work with the code on their own.
The MyFaces PMC might then choose to bring a proposal to the Incubator
PMC to create a podling, and see if the Incubator PMC
On 12/28/05, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Although that might be technically true, we do things collectively in the
> ASF. Mind you, we've not had a process for voting on IP Clearance type
> submissions, so that's been a potential loophole.
I'm not sure what a vote would accomplis
On 12/28/05, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there community, or just code? If a community comes with it, too, I
> would certainly expect incubation,
+1
I would say that the line is whether the existing community is ready,
willing, and able to work with the code without adding un
On 12/23/05, Martin Sebor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I spotted the same "discrepancy" myself a while back (I only found
> one podling with a STATUS file -- Beehive). Eventually it turned out
> that what was meant by the STATUS file was the podling's status Web
> page.
>
>
> > I think that was jus
On 12/21/05, Ted Leung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd love to have a good AJAX project here at Apache, but I'm not at
> all convinced that this is the best way to get it. I also talked to
> Alex Russell at Dojo about coming to the ASF (at this year's OSCON),
> and the overhead thing was already
Has anyone found a free link on nameprotect.com?
Any insight on how incubating projects are suppose to clear trademarks now?
Do we need to get an actual account or something?
-Ted.
On 11/27/05, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there there still a free search page at namepr
Is there there still a free search page at nameprotect.com ?
There used to be a "Search Now" link at
* http://www.nameprotect.com/html/services/tm/tm_research.html
but I don't see it.
The old
* http://www.nameprotect.com/cgi-bin/FREESearch/search.cgi
redirects me to the account login page.
On 9/6/05, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I didn't argument against using the incubator infrastructure.
>
> Nobody seemed too interested here, though (in contradiction to the
> MyFaces community, who was very interested), that's why Ted probably
> thought about going through
On 8/31/05, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> However, as the rules stand right now, if you have a PMC that has voted
> to accept the project then you don't even need a vote here; you're
> simply good to go.
>
> Yeah, I was surprised too but that's the rules as they are now.
>
Since a software grant is involved, we do need to incubate the code. So, we
are at the step where
"The Incubator PMC MAY immediately accept the Candidate, or may (at the
discretion of the Incubator PMC) require a successful VOTE by the Incubator
PMC."
If no one responds negatively to the VOTE
I would like to call for a vote of the Incubator PMC on the MyFaces proposal
to incubate the Tobago codebase, and if successful, to create a Tobago
subproject within the MyFaces project.
The proposal was first circulated to general@ in message #5937, and is
currently represented on the Incubat
The next step is for the incubator PMC to vote on the proposal. Once the
proposal passes, we can start filing the CLAs and asking root to create the
accounts.
-Ted.
On 8/31/05, Arvid Hülsebus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Ted,
>
> thanks for adding the proposal to the wiki and for the
I added the proposal to the wiki, and then updated it to reflect that I
could serve as Mentor, and then made some stylistic changes.
* http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TobagoProposal
-Ted.
On 7/7/05, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And by documenting the existing practices, I "catalyzed" this discussion,
> which may result in further change. Roy seems to be proposing a compromise
> of sorts, where the discussion and vote are on the private list, but the
> announcement o
On 7/7/05, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't believe we should have PMC
> lists (only dev and private), which is why your scenario doesn't
> apply in my model of how a project works.
Could someone clarify on the difference between "private" and "pmc".
Is it just nomenclature
On 7/2/05, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 03 July 2005 04:44, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> > This last bit troubles me a bit. I can't say I've seen this 're-emergence'
> > but that's probably my shortcoming in not tracking discussions.
>
> I second that having "shadow pl
Once upon a time in Jakarta, all the votes were held on the various
public dev lists, including votes for new Committers.
I've seen rererences on communty@ and members@ that other projects
prefer to have the Committer votes on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've also seen references to some projects "informal
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 22:41:18 -0500, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ted,
>
> It seems appropriate to graduate, but should iBATIS be a TLP, or go under
> db.apache.org, along with Derby and related Jakarta Commons code that has
> been moving, in your opinion?
>
> --- Noel
We di
The iBATIS team has worked through the incubation checklist in a open and
collaborative fashion. The community remains strong, and we feel ready to apply
for graduation.
With the Incubator PMC's approval, we would apply to the board for acceptance
as a top-level project.
Project checklist: htt
There being three +1s and no negative comments, I've filed an Account Request
with Infrastructure.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-217
-Ted.
On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 08:59:13 -0500, Ted Husted wrote:
> A vote was held among the iBATIS Podling PMC members regarding
> adding R
> [x] Graduate the Directory Project
> [ ] Abstain
> [ ] Keep incubating the Directory Project
+1
-Ted.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Agreed. Unfortunately, I was entirely off-line at the same time, and your
message was stuck in the moderation queue. My intent was to explain to the team
why there was a lag.
It would be my strong suggestion that we try to funnel all infrastructure
tasks, especially those for the incubator, thr
Sorry, Clinton. I've been out of town this week and couldn't get to my email.
Noel sent a message to the dev@ list, but it was stuck in the moderation queue.
Noel was asking about the list of committers. I had posted the list on the
original JIRA ticket, and thought everything was handled, but t
The blue hat should have been a give-away :)
On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 19:30:56 -0700, Clinton Begin wrote:
> Ummmyou mean my *SON* Cameron. :-)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAI
The short-story is that the iBATIS committers have been "too busy driving to
get gas". ;)
The project was very active when it entered incubation and has stayed active
throughout. It was hard to get the committers to stop committing long enough to
move the repository. I think the only way the re
respectfully ask the Incubator PMC to
ratify the PPMC vote, so that Roberto Rabe can appointed a iBATIS Committer and
iBATIS PPMC member.
Roberto has already filed a CLA, acknowledged by the ASF Secretary on 26 Jan
2005.
-Ted.
--- Original Message ---
From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL P
If someone could help us out and import that SVN dump referred to by
* http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-186
it would really make today a "Super Sunday" for the iBATIS team.
Because of one SNAFU or the other (mea culpa), the repository has been frozen
for two weeks.
:) It's a very act
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 17:01:02 -0500, Ted Husted wrote:
> www.apache.org/~husted/ibatisnet1.tar.gz
Man, I just can't get this one right :(
The location is www.apache.org/~husted/ibatisnet1.gz
No .tar. this time.
-T.
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 15:24:12 -0500, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Ted,
>
>>> iBATIS is an incubator project with an external Subversion
>>> repository that is now ready for import.
>>>
>>> The SVN dumpfile is available at
>>> www.apache.org/~husted/ibatisnet1.tar.gz
>>>
> I went to load it into the te
I'll get a dump from WUSH.NET, Noel. Thanks for following up.
While we've been committing to an offsite repository, all the actual work has
been done within the ASF infrastructure. Development decisions are made on the
ASF dev list, users are supported on the ASF user lists, issues are resolved
Doing this on the heels of Jakarta Commons migration is not the best timing
:), but if someone had a chance to help out with this SVN import, our podling
would be able to apply for graduation.
-Ted.
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 08:03:13 -0500, Ted Husted wrote:
> This is the final step the iBATIS t
This is the final step the iBATIS team needs to take before applying for
graduation.
I'm posting the ticket here, in case someone were able to help us resolve it.
-Ted.
--- Original Message ---
From: "Ted Husted (JIRA)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc
The MyFaces PPMC recently created a distribution dubbed 1.0.8 and held a vote
as to whether the distribution is of at least "beta" quality.
The result of that vote is 5 +1s by PPMC members, one +1 from a developer, and
no negative votes or comments.
In the meantime, the Incubator PMC has voted
Ditto for the wiki frontpage.
http://wiki.apache.org/nutch
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 17:39:06 -0800, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> You now have karma, mailing lists, and a subversion repository.
> Please go ahead and commit the project status to incubator site-
> author.
>
> Roy
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:
To date, we've had binding +1s from
* Ted Husted
* Noel Bergman
* Jim Jagielski
* James Holmes
* Carig McClanahan
along with a non-binding +1 from
* Dion Gillard
and no -1s.
In accordance with the vote, the MyFaces PPMC will proceed to draft a
resolution for the Board's review an
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 21:13:39 -0500, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> I seem to recall that Mr. Struts, and several other Strutters, were
> watching MyFaces. Would you ping Craig for his response?
>
> Other than inattention (which is my guess), can you conceive of any
> reason for people to not support MyF
2
Mine and yours :)
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 14:39:51 -0500, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Ted,
>
> It has been almost a week, albeit with a long weekend in the
> middle. Would you please review the archives and post a body count
> for this thread?
>
> I deliberately try not to cast the first vote on thes
:) Submit a status report to Noel telling the board that the podling has been
accepted :)
And +1 from me too.
(0) Make sure that any non-ASF Committers have filed a CLA. If not, they
absolutely must do so as soon as possible. Otherwise, they cannot get karma to
a ASF repository. The clas.txt l
ibatis
The iBATIS team has worked through the incubation checklist in a
open and collaborative fashion. The remaining step is to transfer
the source code repositories to svn.apache.org. The offsite repositories
are being frozen on Sunday 16 January 2005, in order to
complete the transfer. Once the
The MyFaces team has worked through the incubation checklist in a open and
collaborative fashion. The community remains strong, and the team has prepared
a new release. We feel ready to apply for graduation.
With the Incubator PMC's approval, we would apply to the board for acceptance
as a top-
> Make sure that the requested project name does not already exist and check
> www.nameprotect.com to be sure that the name is not already trademarked for
> an existing software product.
Do we have an account with NameProtect?
A prior post mentioned using the free internet search, but I don't s
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 09:27:52 +0100, Manfred Geiler wrote:
> Hi Ted, hi James,
>
> We would like to release the first Apache MyFaces version as soon
> as possible.
> Can you please tell us the preconditions and something about the
> infrastructure? How and where the archives should be uploaded, etc.
Jaaron,
Either place is fine with me. Though, now that you mention it, the wiki might be a
more collaborative place to start.
Here's another old link with some material we could incorporate:
* http://jakarta.apache.org/site/guides.html
Though it now overlaps with material available elsewhere.
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:26:22 -0400 (EDT), J Aaron Farr wrote:
> How big were you thinking of making this? Your outline suggests
> several pages at least. Or were you thinking of just one page?
It should be as short as we make make it, but no shorter :)
> I had been thinking of putting together
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 19:28:56 -0400, J Aaron Farr wrote:
> Where are you working on this? I'd love to help.
>
> jaaron
We should probably work on it in the Incubator repository. Perhaps as a standalone
whiteboard document first, and then as the Projects page, when it's ready for prime
time.
If
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 17:01:17 -0700, Robin Antony wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have been following this thread with quite some interest. IMO
> there should be a set of rules to let the novice commiters know
> when a ASF veteran who is guiding the team is really crossing the
> line. There should be a do and
STATUS: iBATIS
All needed CLAs are on file. Code grants are in transit. Accounts for the committers
are created. Mailing lists are created. Committers are subscribing. The Jira setup for
the project is being finalized. The project incubator page is created. Committers are
preparing the SourceFo
STATUS: MyFaces
All needed CLAs are on file. A code grant is in transit. Accounts for the committers
have been created. Mailing lists are created. Committers are subscribed. The Jira
setup for the project is being finalized. The project incubator page is created.
Committers are preparing the So
+1
As someone who is sheparding podlings, it seems like busy work to move ongoing
discussions from one list to another. There is already enough to do without adding the
additional confusion of "which list do we use now".
-Ted.
On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 10:08:04 +0200, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
> N
, 11 Sep 2004 13:43:52 -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Martin Marinschek wrote:
>> I wonder if we should start to worry now - should we try to
>> resend the stuff?
>>
>
>> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>>> Ted Husted wrote:
>>>> Ted Husted wrote:
>>>
t; + MyFaces +
> MyFaces is a framework for building Java Server
> application GUIs based on JavaServer Faces (JSR-127); this
> implementation is not yet certified. + Incubator
> PMC + Ted Husted + 2004-07-
> 16 + +
OK, now I'm starting to worry :)
The CLAs that Manfred sent by surface mail should have arrived a week ago. Might they
still be pending, or should we try again?
-Ted.
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 16:18:19 -0400, Ted Husted wrote:
> Oh, and Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> collected t
I couldn't get Forrest to compile a clean checkout of the site either. My documents
validated, so I crossed my fingers, and checked them in :)
-Ted.
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 09:02:58 -0400, Ted Husted wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:39:24 -0700, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>
>> Could som
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:39:24 -0700, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> Could someone aware of its status please add MyFaces to the
> incubator projects section, like the other incubating podlings:
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/howtoparticipate.html#Updati
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
