clearance passes by lazy consensus if no -1 votes are cast within
the next 72 hours.
Thanks,
Simon Willnauer
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3305
[2]https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/site-author/ip-clearance/lucene-kuromoji.xml
[3]
hhttp://mail
hey folks,
the apache lucene project currently works on a code donation for
Kuromoji Japanese Analyzer [1]. ICLA, CLA and code grant have been
received and as far as I know we now need to submit the
ip-clearance.xml file to the incubator website. I am wondering how I
submit this or who is going to
+1 (not binding)
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:47 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> On 01/26/2011 11:05 PM, Troy Howard wrote:
>>
>> All,
>>
>> Since posting the Lucene.Net Incubator proposal announcement on Jan
>> 12th, we now have three mentors signed up and would like to call a
>> vote to accept Lucene.
+1 to this proposal - I am happy to see that this worked out and
Lucene.Net moves forward!
simon
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Troy Howard wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> Please review our proposal for moving the Lucene.Net project back to
>>
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Pid wrote:
> On 24/08/2010 22:55, Upayavira wrote:
>
>> But people aren't going to be thinking about governing TLPs when making
>> assumptions about a name.
>>
>> Does this project actually relate to Lucene or not? Apache Connectors
>> Framework tells me it is eit
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
> On Aug 21, 2010, at 6:30 AM, Pid * wrote:
>
>> Isn't there a risk of causing confusion with the Apache HTTPD mod_jk /
>> Tomcat Connector?
>
> Looks pretty distinct to me.
I agree, the risk that people confuse those two seems very low.
E
