+1
On 2020/10/19 17:29:23, Tianqi Chen wrote:
> Dear Incubator:
>
> A month ago we brought up the discussion about graduating TVM as TLP. After
> great discussions in the apache way [2],
> we get good support from the incubator and also get helpful feedback about
> producing another release.
>
+1
Best,
Sebastian (one of the TVM mentors)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 (binding)
On 16.03.19 06:52, Sheng Wu wrote:
+1 binding
--
Sheng Wu
Apache SkyWalking, ShardingSphere, Zipkin
Twitter, wusheng1108
-- Original --
From: "Paul King";
Date: Sat, Mar 16, 2019 06:47 PM
To: "general";
Subject: R
+1 (binding)
On 27.02.19 23:44, Markus Weimer wrote:
Hi everyone,
we've discussed the proposal for the TVM project in [1]. The proposal itself can
be found on the wiki [2].
According to the Incubator rules[3] I'd like to call a vote to accept the new
TVM project as a podling in the Apache Incu
I have also volunteered as a potential mentor for the TVM project and I
am very excited about it :)
Best,
Sebastian
On 17.02.19 09:02, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
+1 binding with a caveat:
You need mentors and champions from Apache who are available and ideally
active in the incubator. Markus
, Sebastian wrote:
So to rephrase this question, if the project finds a way to archive the
discussions to ASF-controlled infra (e.g., to a dedicated mailinglist),
than they could keep using the board?
That's my understanding. It applied to the ASF Slack, for example, or
IRC, or other communic
Thank you!
On 14.01.19 11:19, Matt Sicker wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 at 07:15, Sebastian wrote:
So to rephrase this question, if the project finds a way to archive the
discussions to ASF-controlled infra (e.g., to a dedicated mailinglist),
than they could keep using the board?
That'
So to rephrase this question, if the project finds a way to archive the
discussions to ASF-controlled infra (e.g., to a dedicated mailinglist),
than they could keep using the board?
Best,
Sebastian
On 14.01.19 01:14, Dave Fisher wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 13, 2019, at 10:09 PM
whether
they could keep it. Do we have an official stance on that?
Best,
Sebastian
PS: As a side note, I'd like to mention that the project will have a
dev@ and private@ mailinglist as usual, this question is only about the
interactions with
+1 (binding)
tested checksums and building from source on Ubuntu 16.
-s
On 10.09.2018 07:41, Sergio Fernández wrote:
+1 (binding)
So far I've checked:
* signatures and digests (md5 checksums can be removed)
* source releases file layouts
* matched git tags and commit ids
* incubator suffix an
Hi,
The page http://incubator.apache.org/projects/mxnet.html is outdated,
and we would like to update it, can anybody point me to how that works?
Would it be ok to have a committer take care of that page or should we
mentors do it?
Best,
Sebastian
+1 (binding)
verified signatures and checksum, could successfully build from source
on ubuntu 16
-s
On 13.07.2018 05:17, Anirudh Subramanian wrote:
Hi all,
This is a call for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.1, release
candidate RC1.
Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and
+1 (binding)
Tested checksum, signature and compilation on ubuntu 16.04.
-sebastian
On 22.06.2018 21:15, Anirudh wrote:
Hi all,
This is a call for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.1, release
candidate RC0.
Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release.
Vote
+1
- checked signatures
- checked building from source under ubuntu 16
On 19.05.2018 19:25, Hen wrote:
I am only reviewing the "diff -r" between RC2 and RC3.
Confirmed that the DevGuide.md is removed.
There is a fix ( https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/10837 )
to Dockerfiles,
,
Sebastian
On 19.05.2018 00:14, Sergio Fernández wrote:
+1 (binding)
So far I've checked:
* signatures and digests
* source releases file layouts
* matched git tags and commit ids
* incubator suffix and disclaimer
* LICENSE & NOTICE files look good despite the many third-party code (CC-BY
files
+1 (binding)
verified build from source on ubuntu 16.04
Best,
Sebastian
On 08.05.2018 19:36, Anirudh wrote:
Hi all,
This is a call for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.0, release
candidate RC2.
Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release.
Vote thread
+1 (binding)
On 01.12.2017 04:30, Chris Olivier wrote:
+1
Additional note:
This MXNet v1.0 release is planned to be announced at the NIPS conference
starting Monday, 04-Dec and hence would request your support in meeting
this timeline. We will continue to address any non-critical issues after
+1 binding
On 11.11.2017 07:44, Suneel Marthi wrote:
+1 binding
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 4:07 AM, Meghna Baijal
wrote:
Hello All,
This is a call for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.12.1, release
candidate 0.
Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release.
*Vote thread:*
+1 (binding)
Successfully built and validated the RC from source.
Best,
Sebastian
On 25.10.2017 03:38, Meghna Baijal wrote:
Hello All,
This is a call for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.12.0, release
candidate 0.
Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release.
*Vote thread
+1
On 07.09.2017 10:32, Ted Dunning wrote:
+1
On Sep 7, 2017 10:11, "Jacques Le Roux"
wrote:
+1 (not binding, not part of IPMC)
Jacques
Le 07/09/2017 à 10:07, Bertrand Delacretaz a écrit :
Hi Incubator PMC.
We recently received a software grant pointing to an archive file for
the code
+1 (binding)
On 30.08.2017 07:37, Henri Yandell wrote:
+1 (binding) to the release.
Minor items (fix next release):
* R-package/ directory is empty (needs removing as confusing, or a README
could be added explaining the code is not present and can be found outside
of Apache).
* Agreed with Jus
on how to setup such an
integration? Do we know of another project, which successfully managed such
a transition/integration?
Best,
Sebastian
+1 (binding)
On 17.01.2017 07:18, Henry Saputra wrote:
+1 (binding)
Good luck!
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 8:20 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
Hi Incubator folk,
I would like to call a vote for accepting "MXNet" for incubation in the
Apache Incubator.
The full proposal is available at this wiki
Great to see you join our efforts!
On 06.01.2017 18:20, Markus Weimer wrote:
On 2017-01-05 9:12 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
I'd like to propose a new incubator Apache MXNet podling.
Awesome! If you still need a mentor, feel free to sign me up!
Markus
---
;> and combination of batch and streaming data processing;
>>>>> and be it further
>>>>>
>>>>> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Flink" be
>>>>> and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
>>>>>
+1
On 10/22/2014 06:21 AM, Tomer Shiran wrote:
Hi Everyone,
We wrapped up the vote on the Apache Drill dev list in which the community
expressed its desire to graduate to a top-level project. That vote passed
with 23 +1s (http://bit.ly/1tcrHVS) and 0 -1s (including the project's
mentors, PMC me
Awesome!
On 04/14/2014 08:23 PM, Alan Gates wrote:
The votes passes with:
8 binding +1, Sebastian Schelter, Henry Saputra, Suresh Srinivas, Till
Westmann, Andrew Purtell, Owen O’Malley, Roman Shaposhnik, Jakob Homan
1 non-binding +1, Hitesh Shah
no +/-0 or -1s.
Congratulations to the new
AFAIR any ASF member should be able to join the Incubator PMC without
any problems. Maybe you could send a mail to the chair of the incubator
(don't know out of my head who that is at the moment).
Best,
Sebastian
On 04/10/2014 08:06 PM, Sean Owen wrote:
Hello all, just pinging this re
===
Sebastian Schelter is a committer and PMC member of Apache Mahout and Apache
Giraph, member of the Apache Software Foundation, member of the Incubator PMC
and project mentor for Apache Drill. Sebastian, along with our mentors, will
guide the rest of the committers that have experience with
Hi Alan,
I already took the freedom to add Henry to the proposal.
Btw, As I've learned that it is possible to be committer and mentor in one
person, I'd also volunteer as a mentor.
Best,
Sebastian
Am 07.04.2014 18:15 schrieb "Alan Gates" :
> Henry, definitely gl
I added you to the mentors list in the proposal.
On 04/07/2014 03:47 PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
Thanks Sebastian, always love to see project from academic setting to be
materialized as an Apache project
On Monday, April 7, 2014, Sebastian Schelter wrote:
You're very welcome to join
re is currently a long-term commitment to fund salaried
developers for Stratosphere by public and private organizations in Europe.
=== Inexperience with Open Source ===
Sebastian Schelter is a committer and PMC member of Apache Mahout and Apache
Giraph, member of the Apache Software Foundation, member o
d
support different execution engines underneath. Stratosphere would be a
prime candidate for such an effort.
--sebastian
On 03/30/2014 09:14 AM, Alan Gates wrote:
I would like to propose Stratosphere as an Apache Incubator project. I have
posted the proposal to https://wiki.apache.org
Hi Nick,
the username is SebastianSchelter.
Thanks,
Sebastian
On 03/11/2014 06:20 PM, Nick Burch wrote:
On Tue, 11 Mar 2014, Ted Dunning wrote:
Sebastian Schelter is a new mentor for Drill and needs wiki write
permissions to sign off on monthly reports.
Can somebody help by giving him
+1 (binding)
Fully agree with Ted's view on the Spark community.
On 02/07/2014 06:32 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
+1 (binding)
These wrinkles are not as big as they appear. For instance, the issue with
some committers not noticing that their accounts were live is actually due to a
better submissi
Mridul Muralidharan
Nick Pentreath
Andrew Xia
Haoyuan Li
Sandy Ryza
Sebastian Schelter *
Kostas Sakellis
Christopher Nguyen
Aaron Davidson
Shivaram Venkataraman
Kay Ousterhout
Evan Sparks
Xuefeng Wu
Konstantin Boudnik
Rahul Chugh
Prashant Sharma
Stephen Haberman
Prabeesh K.
Saisai Shao
Junfeng Feng
Jason
improvements, among few new features. The full
changelog is available at:
http://s.apache.org/marmotta-3.1.0-changelog
We invite you to join the development community. Further details at:
http://marmotta.incubator.apache.org/development.html
Sebastian,
on behalf of the Marmotta development
next release
(MARMOTTA-327).
Greetings,
Sebastian
2013/10/2 Olivier Lamy
> +1 sources build fine.
>
> --
> Olivier
> On Sep 30, 2013 8:17 PM, "Sebastian Schaffert"
> wrote:
>
> > Dear all,
> >
> > After several months of work since the last i
Hi sebb,
the GIT hash of the release candidate is
c66a4eb5743820c89fcf0446efab60a50965c6de . I will change the build process
so it includes this hash in the vote e-mail.
Greetings,
Sebastian
2013/10/1 sebb
> On 30 September 2013 11:17, Sebastian Schaffert
> wrote:
> &
neral incubator to check our release
candidate. The release notes are available at the Jira Issue Tracker [4].
The vote form is included at the bottom of this mail.
Greetings,
Sebastian
[1] http://apache.markmail.org/message/5tieelmeevi2j6xb
[2] http://apache.markmail.org/message/lk3hc3jutoaxp6
nding votes with +1 (mentors and ant elder)
- 7 non-binding votes with +1
- 1 binding vote with "not -1" from Marvin, so I count it as 0 ;-)
Since the votes are all positive, we will now proceed with releasing RC8 as
3.0.0-incubating ;-)
Greetings,
Sebastian
want any users with legal problems
... ;-)
Greetings,
Sebastian
2013/4/17 sebb
> On 15 April 2013 14:40, Sebastian Schaffert wrote:
>
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Apache Marmotta is an implementation of the Linked Data Platform and
> > accompanying services. In the la
entences like "NOTICE is reserved for a certain subset of legally
required notifications". :-P
Thanks for checking, BTW. From your point of view, is the NOTICE and
LICENSE we have for Marmotta too extensive? Where and how could it be
improved?
Greetings,
Sebastian
want any users with legal problems
... ;-)
Greetings,
Sebastian
2013/4/17 sebb
> On 15 April 2013 14:40, Sebastian Schaffert wrote:
>
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Apache Marmotta is an implementation of the Linked Data Platform and
> > accompanying services. In the la
a%2Edev
[2]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314321&version=12323952
Please find attached below the concrete details on the release and on the
vote.
Greetings,
Sebastian
===
A candidate for the Marmotta 3.
Hi,
This proposal looks very interesting to me. What exactly is the scope of
Tez? Does it aim to be a general data flow system such as
Stratosphere[1] or Hyracks[2]? Or will it still be executing Map and
Reduce tasks, that are composable in a more flexible manner?
Best,
Sebastian
[1] http
lo
>
>>
>> --benson
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
>
> -
ld see this out
of the scope of the project, and there are others doing this already, e.g.
D3RQ, Pubby, etc.
Linked Data needs not necessarily also be Open Data, the same technology can
also be used inside enterprises for information integration. In enterprises,
the platform will have to ful
sitive association (cute) and would also provide easy
branding with images and logos.
What do you think?
Greetings,
Sebastian
Am 19.11.2012 um 09:01 schrieb Sebastian Schaffert:
> Hi Ted,
>
> I read all your mail ( :-) ) and I am sorry that this evolved into such a
> discussion. F
thanks again for rising the legal issue - something we will take into the
discussion.
Greetings,
Sebastian
Am 18.11.2012 um 21:55 schrieb Ted Dunning:
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 1:45 AM, Paolo Castagna
> wrote:
>
>>
>
> On 17/11/12 22:49, Ted Dunning wrote:
>>
>
ncern serious (especially the legal issue) and will
discuss the issue on Monday. I am also grateful for the proposals that have
already been done on the list.
Greetings,
Sebastian
Am 17.11.2012 um 23:49 schrieb Ted Dunning:
> Frankly, the phrase "linked data" is also so generic a
dology for parallel execution. A more artificial
name would probably have a harder time establishing a brand (but of course the
project is good enough to manage ;-) ).
In case the Incubator PMC still recommends to rename the project, I agree we
should do it BEFORE starting up the project. We
Linked Data scenarios, providing facilities to deal with different data sources
and requirements (small data/big data, open access/restricted access, etc).
We are looking forward to your feedback and suggestions on how to improve the
proposal and idea!
Sergio, Thomas, Jakob and Sebastian
We are happy to announce Version 2.0 of Apache OpenMeetings Incubating!
Apache OpenMeetings provides video conferencing, instant messaging, white
board, collaborative document editing and other groupware tools using API
functions of the Red5 Streaming Server for Remoting and Streaming.
This is ou
.
thanks,
sebastian
2009/11/19 Donald Woods
> Jay points out an important design feature, in that if you write to the JPA
> 1.0 or 2.0 spec API and don't use any provider specific extensions or
> behaviors, then you can easily allow your users to choose a different
> provider (bas
uses
many of Apache Technologies like Tomcat, Mina, Velocity, Commons, ...
You may find all existing documents and further material on the GoogleCode
pages: http://code.google.com/p/openmeetings/
We appreciate any feedback and comments on the proposal.
--
Sebastian Wagner
http://www.webbase
general Issue? For running the application we also use
hibernate.
Spring, Apache Batik and Apache Mina are also used, but these are all
already Apache Licenses projects. Hibernate is LGPL. Is this a conflict?
sebastian
2009/10/28 Leif Hedstrom
> On 10/28/2009 08:19 AM, Alexei Fedotov wr
ed5 itself. But anyway, we use Red5 just
like a Library, we don't modify Red5-Code. We use the API that it provides
to connect to the clients and the other way round.
sebastian
2009/10/28 Niclas Hedhman
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Ian Boston wrote:
>
> > Also, are ther
already uses
many of Apache Technologies like Tomcat, Mina, Velocity, Commons, ...
You may find all existing documents and further material on the GoogleCode
pages: http://code.google.com/p/openmeetings/
We appreciate any feedback and comments on the proposal.
sebastian wagner
--
Sebastian
59 matches
Mail list logo
