maven-wrapper.html
On 7-2-2020 20:06:19, Robert Scholte wrote:
After sharing the information with the Maven PMC, we want to do the following:
- accept Maven wrapper.
- don't wait for Walmart to hand over a SGA for the wrapper-plugin. Instead we
will start to write our own maven-wrapper-pl
e a lot of effort to get it running.
thanks,
Robert
On 4-2-2020 19:28:03, Robert Scholte wrote:
Thanks John, I'll share this with the PMC and we'll let you now what we'll
decide.
Robert
On 4-2-2020 17:07:31, John D. Ament wrote:
To be very explicit here:
- The code for the ma
Thanks John, I'll share this with the PMC and we'll let you now what we'll
decide.
Robert
On 4-2-2020 17:07:31, John D. Ament wrote:
To be very explicit here:
- The code for the maven wrapper is fine, it's already apache licensed and
has no NOTICE file declared with it, so would be perfectly fi
Hi Justin,
No, we've got agreements from all significant contributors and I assumed it was
clear that this was all we needed. "The takari CLA only grants Takari and hence
also Walmart equal access to the code. As such the contributors all own
copyright to the code and can assign to Apache."
Ev
Vote succeeded by lazy consensus.
I will continue the process.
thanks,
Robert
On 24-1-2020 11:05:15, Robert Scholte wrote:
Although there wasn't an explicit -1, I noticed some concerns.
I would like to complete the process properly so would like to see from John
and Justin if we can con
Although there wasn't an explicit -1, I noticed some concerns.
I would like to complete the process properly so would like to see from John
and Justin if we can continue?
If not, what do you expect before finishing this process?
regards,
Robert
On 10-1-2020 16:03:16, Robert Scholte wro
or the wrapper and one for the plugin. They should have different
> needs.
>
> John
>
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 4:30 PM Robert Scholte wrote:
>
> >
> > On 6-1-2020 22:24:09, Justin Mclean wrote:
> > HI,
> >
> > Confirmed IP Clearance from all active
contributors for [2] without an SGA
I think you would require ICLAs from all significant contributors, not just
current ones.
Robert Scholte:
I did an analysis of all the commits. The 5 mentioned are the only significant
contributors.
Attached (if accepted) an excel sheet with all the details
://github.com/takari/takari-maven-plugin/blob/master/LICENSE.txt
[https://github.com/takari/takari-maven-plugin/blob/master/LICENSE.txt]
While the ASF license allows this, we generally want explicit permission from
the owners.
Robert Scholte:
Who are the owners here? We have explicit clearance
And vote of acceptance
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/97054be79cede23c792c1db91f0fd73129ce969fea26bd12a1bf38f5%40%3Cprivate.maven.apache.org%3E
On 6-1-2020 22:06:52, Robert Scholte wrote:
Distribution rights:
https://github.com/takari/maven-wrapper/blob/master/LICENSE.txt
https
Distribution rights:
https://github.com/takari/maven-wrapper/blob/master/LICENSE.txt
https://github.com/takari/takari-maven-plugin/blob/master/LICENSE.txt
Confirmed IP Clearance from all active committers:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7c8fc7fa0fc677c24504d948d7d71e6cdebdb952c9ca0a2183460
Apache Maven received a code donation for the Maven Wrapper
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/maven-wrapper.html
All sources are under Apache License 2.
Most likely most of the maven-wrapper code and some parts of the
takari-maven-plugin will end up in Maven (core), so there will
no ne
12 matches
Mail list logo
